Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Meno

View through CrossRef
This chapter examines various aspects of two central themes of the Meno, how knowledge (epistēmē) is related to true belief, and how it is acquired. This chapter argues that the Meno’s definition of knowledge as true belief ‘tied down with a reasoning out of the cause’, is best understood as a characterisation of a form of knowledge constituted by understanding, rather than by justified true belief. It argues that the best way to construe Meno’s paradox as a serious threat to the possibility of acquiring knowledge is to take it to be concerned with inquiry as the search for understanding something for oneself. The chapter advances a new version of the unjustly neglected interpretation of Plato’s response as principally cast in terms of recollection and recognition, as against the dominant interpretation, which sees it as principally cast in terms of the use of true beliefs as the way to knowledge. In the last section the chapter considers knowledge and true belief in the final part of the Meno, arguing that what Socrates says about their relationship here cannot be reconciled with his earlier account: this confirms the view that the arguments of the final section are not intended to be taken at face value.
Title: The Meno
Description:
This chapter examines various aspects of two central themes of the Meno, how knowledge (epistēmē) is related to true belief, and how it is acquired.
This chapter argues that the Meno’s definition of knowledge as true belief ‘tied down with a reasoning out of the cause’, is best understood as a characterisation of a form of knowledge constituted by understanding, rather than by justified true belief.
It argues that the best way to construe Meno’s paradox as a serious threat to the possibility of acquiring knowledge is to take it to be concerned with inquiry as the search for understanding something for oneself.
The chapter advances a new version of the unjustly neglected interpretation of Plato’s response as principally cast in terms of recollection and recognition, as against the dominant interpretation, which sees it as principally cast in terms of the use of true beliefs as the way to knowledge.
In the last section the chapter considers knowledge and true belief in the final part of the Meno, arguing that what Socrates says about their relationship here cannot be reconciled with his earlier account: this confirms the view that the arguments of the final section are not intended to be taken at face value.

Related Results

Meno mirties motyvas Th. Adorno antinomiškos meno kūrinių prigimties teorijoje
Meno mirties motyvas Th. Adorno antinomiškos meno kūrinių prigimties teorijoje
Straipsnyje analizuojama meno mirties samprata T. Adorno estetikos teorijoje. Meno kūrinio neigimo santykių samprata laikoma T. Adorno bandymu aprašyti vieną iš būdų, kuriais konkr...
Virtue in the Cave
Virtue in the Cave
Abstract Offers an interpretation of Plato's Meno that seeks to illuminate the particularly “therapeutic” philosophy that Socrates practices. It argues that the Meno...
Modernizmas: meno dehumanizacija?
Modernizmas: meno dehumanizacija?
Straipsnyje aptariama meno dehumanizacijos problema ispanų filosofo O. y Gasseto darbuose. XIX a. pabaigoje prasidėjusi meno metamorfozė sunkiai tilpo į ankstesnės meno raidos rėmu...
Apie meno kūrybos tipą
Apie meno kūrybos tipą
Straipsnyje siekiama atsakyti į klausimą, kas vienija individualius meno kūrinius. Mėginimas susieti pagrindinius meno tipus su vidine meno kūrinio sandara, turiniu ir jo pasireišk...
Idealistinės meno filosofijos įtaka ekspresionizmo estetikai ir meno praktikai
Idealistinės meno filosofijos įtaka ekspresionizmo estetikai ir meno praktikai
Straipsnyje siekiama atskleisti ekspresionizmo meninės praktikos ryšius su iracionalistine ir formalistine meno filosofija. Didžiausias dėmesys skiriamas formalistiniam ekspresioni...
In the Phaedo, Socrates pulls away from and repudiates recollection as it is portrayed in the Meno. In the Phaedo, it is Cebes who champions the Meno's form of recollection; Socrat...
Vytauto Kavolio vaizduojamojo meno sociologija
Vytauto Kavolio vaizduojamojo meno sociologija
Straipsnyje aptariamas Amerikos lietuvių sociologo Vytauto Kavolio vaizduojamojo meno sociologijos ir amerikiečių sociologo Talcotto Parsonso struktūrinio funkcionalizmo santykis. ...
Examining the nature of epistemic value
Examining the nature of epistemic value
"In Plato's Meno, the titular character asks "why knowledge is prized far more highly than right opinion" and wants Socrates to explain why they are different. In another of Plato'...

Back to Top