Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of hemodynamic and analgesic effects of interscalene block with bupivacaine versus bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine combination for shoulder arthroscopy under general anesthesia
View through CrossRef
Background: The interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopy is a well-established procedure. Many drugs have been used as adjuvants to local anesthetics to increase the quality of block in regional anesthesia, with variable results.
Aims and Objectives: The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during interscalene block in terms of intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative analgesia.
Materials and Methods: Thirty patients, aged 20–55 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, scheduled for shoulder arthroscopic surgery for <2 h, were allocated into two equal groups to receive inj. bupivacaine (0.25%) with inj. dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (Group BD, n=15) or inj. bupivacaine (0.25%) with 1 mL normal saline (Group BS, n=15), total volume 20 mL in each case. After settlement of the interscalene block, both groups received general anesthesia as per standard protocol. Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate [HR] and systolic blood pressure [SBP]) were assessed in the intraoperative period, and postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale score in the postoperative period at stipulated time points.
Results: The mean values of HR and SBP were considerably low at all observed time points in the intraoperative period (i.e., at 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, and120 min), in comparison with the saline group (P<0.0001). VAS scores between the two groups were considerably lower only at 8, 12, and 18 h in patients receiving dexmedetomidine (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant with bupivacaine can achieve a better hemodynamic profile (lower HR and SBP) in the intraoperative period. Also, the use of dexmedetomidine provides better postoperative analgesia profiles in the later part of the postoperative period (8–18 h), and the effect usually wanes by 24 h.
Pharmamedix India Publication Pvt Ltd
Title: Comparison of hemodynamic and analgesic effects of interscalene block with bupivacaine versus bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine combination for shoulder arthroscopy under general anesthesia
Description:
Background: The interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopy is a well-established procedure.
Many drugs have been used as adjuvants to local anesthetics to increase the quality of block in regional anesthesia, with variable results.
Aims and Objectives: The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during interscalene block in terms of intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative analgesia.
Materials and Methods: Thirty patients, aged 20–55 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, scheduled for shoulder arthroscopic surgery for <2 h, were allocated into two equal groups to receive inj.
bupivacaine (0.
25%) with inj.
dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (Group BD, n=15) or inj.
bupivacaine (0.
25%) with 1 mL normal saline (Group BS, n=15), total volume 20 mL in each case.
After settlement of the interscalene block, both groups received general anesthesia as per standard protocol.
Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate [HR] and systolic blood pressure [SBP]) were assessed in the intraoperative period, and postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale score in the postoperative period at stipulated time points.
Results: The mean values of HR and SBP were considerably low at all observed time points in the intraoperative period (i.
e.
, at 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, and120 min), in comparison with the saline group (P<0.
0001).
VAS scores between the two groups were considerably lower only at 8, 12, and 18 h in patients receiving dexmedetomidine (P<0.
001).
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant with bupivacaine can achieve a better hemodynamic profile (lower HR and SBP) in the intraoperative period.
Also, the use of dexmedetomidine provides better postoperative analgesia profiles in the later part of the postoperative period (8–18 h), and the effect usually wanes by 24 h.
Related Results
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives
Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
Comparison of Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone in PENG Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Hip Surgeries
Comparison of Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone in PENG Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Hip Surgeries
Background: Pain management strategies such as systemic medications, local infiltration, neuraxial anesthesia, and peripheral nerve blocks have been widely studied, but each approa...
Dexmedetomidine as an additive to local anesthetics compared with intravenous dexmedetomidine in peribulbar block for cataract surgery
Dexmedetomidine as an additive to local anesthetics compared with intravenous dexmedetomidine in peribulbar block for cataract surgery
Background:
No studies compared parenteral dexmedetomidine with its use as an adjuvant to ophthalmic block. We compared between adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in...
Effectiveness of Supraclavicular vs. Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block on Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain Scores
Effectiveness of Supraclavicular vs. Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block on Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain Scores
Background: Regional anesthesia is pivotal in upper limb surgeries; supraclavicular and interscalene brachial plexus blocks remain critical in optimizing postoperative analgesia, p...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
Background: Various intrathecal additives are added to local anesthetics to increase the speed of onset, improve the quality, and prolong the
inuence of spinal anesthesia. Midazol...
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Reduction of Emergency Delirium in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Reduction of Emergency Delirium in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
Background: Emergency delirium (ED) is a common and distressing complication in children recovering from anesthesia, particularly after tonsillectomy. Dexmedetomidine, a selective ...
Nursing Methods and Experience of Local Anesthesia Patients under Arthroscope
Nursing Methods and Experience of Local Anesthesia Patients under Arthroscope
In order to solve the nursing problems of local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy, a nursing method and experience based on local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy was prop...

