Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Axiomatic: Constituting ‘transexuality’ and trans sexualities in medicine
View through CrossRef
This article argues that medicine misunderstands the necessarily complex ways trans people experience sexuality. Despite revisions to treatment guidelines and diagnostic descriptions, transgender medicine continues to be based on a paradigmatic narrative of ‘being born in the wrong body’. This narrative performatively reproduces sex, gender and ‘gender dysphoria’ as static, predetermined and independent of medical encounters. It also constructs trans sexualities as limited by and dependent on gender/genital ‘alignment’, which necessarily neglects many trans people’s sexual lives. By mobilising critiques of singularity from science and technology studies (STS), which emphasise how discourses and practices produce both what is knowable and materially possible, this article explores how medicine understands and constitutes ‘transexuality’ as a singular phenomenon that limits trans sexualities. By analysing contemporary medical guidebooks alongside the foundational text of trans medical treatment – Harry Benjamin’s (1999 [1966]) The Transsexual Phenomenon – I argue that medicine constitutes transexuality and understands trans sexualities via four axioms: 1) Transexuality is a disjuncture between mind and body; 2) Transexuality is hating having the wrong genitals; 3) Transexuality is painful and debilitating; and 4) Transexuality is resolvable with hormonal and surgical body modifications. In so doing, medicine flattens out the complexities of trans people’s experiences of gender and sexuality, and simultaneously disavows many trans people’s sexual lives.
Title: Axiomatic: Constituting ‘transexuality’ and trans sexualities in medicine
Description:
This article argues that medicine misunderstands the necessarily complex ways trans people experience sexuality.
Despite revisions to treatment guidelines and diagnostic descriptions, transgender medicine continues to be based on a paradigmatic narrative of ‘being born in the wrong body’.
This narrative performatively reproduces sex, gender and ‘gender dysphoria’ as static, predetermined and independent of medical encounters.
It also constructs trans sexualities as limited by and dependent on gender/genital ‘alignment’, which necessarily neglects many trans people’s sexual lives.
By mobilising critiques of singularity from science and technology studies (STS), which emphasise how discourses and practices produce both what is knowable and materially possible, this article explores how medicine understands and constitutes ‘transexuality’ as a singular phenomenon that limits trans sexualities.
By analysing contemporary medical guidebooks alongside the foundational text of trans medical treatment – Harry Benjamin’s (1999 [1966]) The Transsexual Phenomenon – I argue that medicine constitutes transexuality and understands trans sexualities via four axioms: 1) Transexuality is a disjuncture between mind and body; 2) Transexuality is hating having the wrong genitals; 3) Transexuality is painful and debilitating; and 4) Transexuality is resolvable with hormonal and surgical body modifications.
In so doing, medicine flattens out the complexities of trans people’s experiences of gender and sexuality, and simultaneously disavows many trans people’s sexual lives.
Related Results
A study of the clearness rate of fetal Sylvian fissure shown on different sections by prenatal ultrasound
A study of the clearness rate of fetal Sylvian fissure shown on different sections by prenatal ultrasound
AbstractObjectiveTo compare the clearness rate of fetal Sylvian fissure revealed by prenatal ultrasonography on trans-cerebellar section and trans-thalamic section, and to provide ...
Derby drag: Parodying sexualities in the sport of roller derby
Derby drag: Parodying sexualities in the sport of roller derby
The roller derby revival has created a unique stage and community for women athletes. Using Helen Lenskyj's foundational work to frame the institutional oppressions on women in spo...
Islam, Gender, and Sexualities
Islam, Gender, and Sexualities
Mapping a discussion on gender and sexualities in Islam needs to move beyond an understanding of Islamic law (shariah) and its interpretations that has traditionally been made by m...
Decolonizing Indigenous Sexualities
Decolonizing Indigenous Sexualities
Abstract
Indigenous societies were never straight. Hundreds of languages across the Americas had words referring to same-sex practices and non-binary, fluid understa...
Uncertain Sexualities and the Unusual Woman: Depictions of Jane Addams and Emily Dickinson
Uncertain Sexualities and the Unusual Woman: Depictions of Jane Addams and Emily Dickinson
AbstractHow does contemporary society deal with uncertainty about sexualities in the past? We investigate how two museums manage uncertainty about the sexual histories of two femal...
Program Trans TV dalam Mempertahankan Eksistensinya di Era Digital.
Program Trans TV dalam Mempertahankan Eksistensinya di Era Digital.
Abstract. The decline in television viewership in the digital media era presents a major challenge for the media industry, including Trans TV. This study aims to explore Trans TV’s...
Temporal Flesh, Material Becomings
Temporal Flesh, Material Becomings
Drawing on contemporary trans* scholarship, I highlight an incorporeal, affective dimension of trans* embodiment, which I argue operates nonlinearly, enmeshing a past-present-futur...

