Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Juvenal and the Reign of Trajan
View through CrossRef
The literary evidence for the Trajanic period presents a remarkably difficult problem; for though a fair number of writers whose work is extant today lived and sometimes wrote during the period, they provide information which is disproportionately and disappointingly little in quantity, and in the main highly tendentious. We also lack a biography of Trajan, since Suetonius ended his series not so much at a round dozen as at the end of a dynasty, while the egregious compiler of the Augustan History elected to begin with Hadrian. The reason in the former case is clear and compelling; whatever the motive in the latter, the value of what we have missed as a result is to say the least dubious. Frontinus has no observations on matters outside the scope of his technical discourses; Pliny’s letters, the most extensive of the Latin prose sources, throw valuable light on certain aspects of imperial administration, and offer a rather gingerbread portrait of his own circle of career civil servants and literary dilettanti. In Greek literature, Plutarch is almost devoid of contemporary references, while the orations of Dio Chrysostom have been milked dry, without providing us with any real factual material.
Title: Juvenal and the Reign of Trajan
Description:
The literary evidence for the Trajanic period presents a remarkably difficult problem; for though a fair number of writers whose work is extant today lived and sometimes wrote during the period, they provide information which is disproportionately and disappointingly little in quantity, and in the main highly tendentious.
We also lack a biography of Trajan, since Suetonius ended his series not so much at a round dozen as at the end of a dynasty, while the egregious compiler of the Augustan History elected to begin with Hadrian.
The reason in the former case is clear and compelling; whatever the motive in the latter, the value of what we have missed as a result is to say the least dubious.
Frontinus has no observations on matters outside the scope of his technical discourses; Pliny’s letters, the most extensive of the Latin prose sources, throw valuable light on certain aspects of imperial administration, and offer a rather gingerbread portrait of his own circle of career civil servants and literary dilettanti.
In Greek literature, Plutarch is almost devoid of contemporary references, while the orations of Dio Chrysostom have been milked dry, without providing us with any real factual material.
Related Results
Greek Doctor and Roman Patient
Greek Doctor and Roman Patient
When Juvenal's friend Umbricius is enumerating the manifold occupations which will furnish a livelihood for a starving Greek, he places the practice of medicine between the skill o...
Juvenal Satires
Juvenal Satires
Juvenal's fourth book of Satires consists of three poems which are all concerned with contentment in various forms. The poems use humour and wit to puncture the pretensions of the ...
Juvenal Satires Book III
Juvenal Satires Book III
Juvenal is the last and in many ways the greatest of the four major Roman verse satirists, and this book aims to offer more evidence of Juvenal’s status as one of the finest satiri...
The Reign of Trajan Decius
The Reign of Trajan Decius
The general chronology of the reign of Decius has been described by Arthur Stein in a recent paper, based principally on the evidence of papyri, inscriptions and coins.Grenfell and...
Construire la mémoire : portraits de Trajan, de son vivant et après sa mort
Construire la mémoire : portraits de Trajan, de son vivant et après sa mort
Les portraits avaient, à Rome, la fonction de préserver de l’oubli ceux qui en bénéficiaient, et Trajan a été considéré, de son vivant et longtemps après sa mort, comme le Meilleur...
明武宗親征應州史事考──兼論《明武宗實錄》的書寫特徵
明武宗親征應州史事考──兼論《明武宗實錄》的書寫特徵
<p>正德十二年,明武宗親征應州,逼退蒙軍。《明武宗實錄》的修纂者認為此戰所費不償、戰功甚少且「乘輿幾陷」。但綜合《實錄》的自相矛盾及各方材料所記,可知「乘輿幾陷」並非事實,其傷亡情況亦有諸多疑點。由於武宗等人要為正德朝的「失德」負責,且應州封功確有冒濫,加上京城曾有皇帝被俘的訛言,於是文官們順此思路,淡化了前者的功績。而世宗為塑造新政及其父子的...
Juvenal VI. 1–20, and Some Ancient Attitudes to the Golden Age
Juvenal VI. 1–20, and Some Ancient Attitudes to the Golden Age
Juvenal's sixth Satire begins with a prologue describing the Golden Age which, for the light it sheds both on ancient attitudes to the Saturnian myth and on the Juvenalian concept ...

