Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Utopia or dystopia: On Eastern European Marxist insights into science and technology in aesthetics
View through CrossRef
This paper discusses Eastern European Marxists’ consideration of science and technology concerning aesthetic dimensions. Different from most of Western Marxists who take negative or dystopian attitudes towards modern science and technology from the aesthetic utopian perspective, those Marxists who come from countries such as Hungary, Yugoslav, Poland, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Bulgaria or Romania, which once belonged to the socialist camp, under the influence of Soviet and Western culture, pay attention to the complicated tension between science-technology and aesthetics. In this paper, I probe into these notions by reading György Lukács, Budapest School, Romanian theorists and the Yugoslav Praxis Group, which are divided into four key points: basic nature of science in contrast with arts; modern tension of culture between science and arts; the possibility of scientific aesthetics; and development of arts in the world of technology. There is a dialectical understanding of science and technology here which contributes to contemporary recognition of science and technology from the point of view of neo-humanism, not only in aesthetics but also human existence. This is relevant to theoretical reflection on the present and future Chinese socialist aesthetics.
Title: Utopia or dystopia: On Eastern European Marxist insights into science and technology in aesthetics
Description:
This paper discusses Eastern European Marxists’ consideration of science and technology concerning aesthetic dimensions.
Different from most of Western Marxists who take negative or dystopian attitudes towards modern science and technology from the aesthetic utopian perspective, those Marxists who come from countries such as Hungary, Yugoslav, Poland, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Bulgaria or Romania, which once belonged to the socialist camp, under the influence of Soviet and Western culture, pay attention to the complicated tension between science-technology and aesthetics.
In this paper, I probe into these notions by reading György Lukács, Budapest School, Romanian theorists and the Yugoslav Praxis Group, which are divided into four key points: basic nature of science in contrast with arts; modern tension of culture between science and arts; the possibility of scientific aesthetics; and development of arts in the world of technology.
There is a dialectical understanding of science and technology here which contributes to contemporary recognition of science and technology from the point of view of neo-humanism, not only in aesthetics but also human existence.
This is relevant to theoretical reflection on the present and future Chinese socialist aesthetics.
Related Results
Six theoretical paradigms of Eastern European Marxist aesthetics
Six theoretical paradigms of Eastern European Marxist aesthetics
The conceptual and methodological contributions of Marxist aesthetics from Eastern European countries like Hungary, Yugoslavia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, and East ...
Recreating Prometheus
Recreating Prometheus
Prometheus, chained to a rock, having his liver pecked out by a great bird only for the organ to grow back again each night so that the torture may be repeated afresh the next day ...
Autonomy of art and the limits of aesthetics: Sreten Petrović’s contribution to Marxist aesthetics
Autonomy of art and the limits of aesthetics: Sreten Petrović’s contribution to Marxist aesthetics
The paper explores Sreten Petrović’s contribution to Marxist aesthetics. Petrović developed his theory within the framework of the Yugoslav Praxis School, although he was not a mem...
The Contemporary Dystopian Reality of Slavery and Modern Capitalism in Octavia Butler’s Parable Novels
The Contemporary Dystopian Reality of Slavery and Modern Capitalism in Octavia Butler’s Parable Novels
Critical dystopia as an analytic category for historical enquiry explores contemporary reality and its specificities in time and space. It functions as anagnorisis or recognition o...
An introduction to György Márkus’s aesthetics: Transformation from praxis aesthetics to theory of aesthetic modernity
An introduction to György Márkus’s aesthetics: Transformation from praxis aesthetics to theory of aesthetic modernity
György Márkus, as a leading member of the Budapest School led by György Lukács in Hungary, is closely concerned with aesthetics. His final unfinished writings in political exile in...
In Defense of Utopia
In Defense of Utopia
Even though utopias are potentially dangerous, we nonetheless need utopian visions. Loss of hope and utopia means loss of humanity. But how can we stop utopia turning into dystopia...
The aesthetics of Utopia
The aesthetics of Utopia
This article combines critical, visual and aesthetic theory to argue that the very act of design is a Utopian process. Crucially, the Utopian dimension is not simply a matter of su...
Utopian Prospect of Henri Lefebvre
Utopian Prospect of Henri Lefebvre
Utopia is the lynchpin of Lefebvre’s enterprise. Attempting to understand architecture and the city with Lefebvre but without Utopia impoverishes his theoretical construct. His eth...