Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An introduction to György Márkus’s aesthetics: Transformation from praxis aesthetics to theory of aesthetic modernity

View through CrossRef
György Márkus, as a leading member of the Budapest School led by György Lukács in Hungary, is closely concerned with aesthetics. His final unfinished writings in political exile in Sydney were focused on the question of modern cultural autonomy. From the 1960s to the new century, from Budapest to Sydney in Australia, he established a new form of Neo-Marxist aesthetics on the basis of critical theory drawn from Lukács to the Frankfurt School. His aesthetics includes three dimensions: an aesthetics of praxis, a reconstruction of Lukács’s aesthetics and a theory of aesthetic modernity. His aesthetics is characteristic of analytic philosophy, especially ‘categorical analysis’. It shifts from philosophical aesthetics in the Hungarian period, which is based on an ontological foundation, that is, materialist phenomenology, to social or sociological aesthetics in the Australian period concerning social modernity, institution, constitution, culture, and so on. This is a turn from a philosophical paradigm to a structural one as regards aesthetics, which indicates a break with Lukács’s late return in the early 1960s to Hegelian inspired Ontology of Social Being. Márkus is strictly and essentially an essayist in fragments, who distinguishes himself from the other members of the Budapest School in this way. Ironically, this genre is once again influenced by the young Lukács’s aesthetics.
SAGE Publications
Title: An introduction to György Márkus’s aesthetics: Transformation from praxis aesthetics to theory of aesthetic modernity
Description:
György Márkus, as a leading member of the Budapest School led by György Lukács in Hungary, is closely concerned with aesthetics.
His final unfinished writings in political exile in Sydney were focused on the question of modern cultural autonomy.
From the 1960s to the new century, from Budapest to Sydney in Australia, he established a new form of Neo-Marxist aesthetics on the basis of critical theory drawn from Lukács to the Frankfurt School.
His aesthetics includes three dimensions: an aesthetics of praxis, a reconstruction of Lukács’s aesthetics and a theory of aesthetic modernity.
His aesthetics is characteristic of analytic philosophy, especially ‘categorical analysis’.
It shifts from philosophical aesthetics in the Hungarian period, which is based on an ontological foundation, that is, materialist phenomenology, to social or sociological aesthetics in the Australian period concerning social modernity, institution, constitution, culture, and so on.
This is a turn from a philosophical paradigm to a structural one as regards aesthetics, which indicates a break with Lukács’s late return in the early 1960s to Hegelian inspired Ontology of Social Being.
Márkus is strictly and essentially an essayist in fragments, who distinguishes himself from the other members of the Budapest School in this way.
Ironically, this genre is once again influenced by the young Lukács’s aesthetics.

Related Results

Extending Post-Interpretive Criticism: Additional Diagnostic Indices for Enhanced Phenomenological Fidelity in Art Criticism
Extending Post-Interpretive Criticism: Additional Diagnostic Indices for Enhanced Phenomenological Fidelity in Art Criticism
This paper extends Post-Interpretive Criticism (PIC) by introducing a second layer of diagnostic indices designed to evaluate the phenomenological fidelity of art criticism. While ...
Grammer of Grief
Grammer of Grief
This essay investigates the relationship between mourning and linguistic structure, proposing that grief produces not merely emotional disruption but a reconfiguration of grammar i...
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Contemporary art criticism often advances by way of interpretive extraction. Works are translated into meanings, themes, intentions, and arguments, which then circulate with remark...
Art as Truth: A Treatise
Art as Truth: A Treatise
Art as Truth: A Treatise By Dorian Vale — A Foundational Text of the Post-Interpretive Movement Art as Truth is the culminating philosophical treatise of the Post-Interpretive Mo...
Theory of Misplacement
Theory of Misplacement
Theory of Misplacement By Dorian Vale — A Treatise in the Post-Interpretive Movement Theory of Misplacement is a foundational treatise in the Post-Interpretive canon developed by...
Devotion Without Doctrine
Devotion Without Doctrine
Devotion Without Doctrine advances a secular philosophy of artistic fidelity in which devotion is redefined not as belief in transcendence, but as sustained attention, repetition, ...
A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism
A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism
A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism By Dorian Vale — A Treatise in the Post-Interpretive Movement A Philosophical Departure from Post-Criticism is a pivotal treatise th...
Formal Defence of Post-Interpretive Criticism
Formal Defence of Post-Interpretive Criticism
Formal Defence of Post-Interpretive Criticism By Dorian Vale Philosopher of Aesthetics & Founder of the Post-Interpretive Movement This treatise offers the first formal philo...

Back to Top