Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

806. MINIMALLY INVASIVE REVISION FUNDOPLICATION, IS IT SAFE AND FEASIBLE? SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Laparoscopic fundoplication has become standard of care for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, large and symptomatic hiatal hernia. Failure rate for laparoscopic fundoplication was between 2 to 17%. Doing Revisional Antireflux surgery is technically difficult. Our aim is to analyse symptomatic improvement post surgery, safety and durability of procedure in patients who underwent revision fundoplication at our centre Patients and Methods 22 patients underwent Minimally invasive revision fundoplication between January 2019 to January 2022 were taken into study, of them 12 gentlemen and 10 women were noted. Modified DeMeester score was calculated in all patients preoperatively and on 6 months follow up. Results All patients underwent primary surgery laparoscopically. 14 patients (63.6%)had recurrent reflux symptoms and 8 patients (36.3%) had severe dysphagia. Revision fundoplication was done laparoscopically in 20 patients and 2 patients Robotic surgery was done. Intraoperatively 11 patients had wrap migration, 8 patients had tight wrap, 3 patients had twist of wrap. In the re-do anti-reflux surgery (ARS) procedure, floppy Nissen fundoplication was performed in 86.4% of the patients, which amounts to 19 patients., and 3 patient underwent a 270-degree Toupet fundoplication. In 2 patients, additional composite mesh reinforcement was employed. 13.6 % of patients had intraoperative complications, 9.09 % of patients had pleural injury, 4.7 % had intraoperative bleeding, 9.09% of patients had gallstone disease, for which cholecystectomy was done. All patients anterior and posterior vagus identified and preserved. On follow up 80% of patients had resolution of symptoms, 18% needed intermittent PPI. At a median follow up of 18 months, no surgical failure was noted in endoscopy. Conclusion Laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure when operated in a high volume centre by an expert surgeon.
Title: 806. MINIMALLY INVASIVE REVISION FUNDOPLICATION, IS IT SAFE AND FEASIBLE? SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
Description:
Abstract Introduction Laparoscopic fundoplication has become standard of care for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, large and symptomatic hiatal hernia.
Failure rate for laparoscopic fundoplication was between 2 to 17%.
Doing Revisional Antireflux surgery is technically difficult.
Our aim is to analyse symptomatic improvement post surgery, safety and durability of procedure in patients who underwent revision fundoplication at our centre Patients and Methods 22 patients underwent Minimally invasive revision fundoplication between January 2019 to January 2022 were taken into study, of them 12 gentlemen and 10 women were noted.
Modified DeMeester score was calculated in all patients preoperatively and on 6 months follow up.
Results All patients underwent primary surgery laparoscopically.
14 patients (63.
6%)had recurrent reflux symptoms and 8 patients (36.
3%) had severe dysphagia.
Revision fundoplication was done laparoscopically in 20 patients and 2 patients Robotic surgery was done.
Intraoperatively 11 patients had wrap migration, 8 patients had tight wrap, 3 patients had twist of wrap.
In the re-do anti-reflux surgery (ARS) procedure, floppy Nissen fundoplication was performed in 86.
4% of the patients, which amounts to 19 patients.
, and 3 patient underwent a 270-degree Toupet fundoplication.
In 2 patients, additional composite mesh reinforcement was employed.
13.
6 % of patients had intraoperative complications, 9.
09 % of patients had pleural injury, 4.
7 % had intraoperative bleeding, 9.
09% of patients had gallstone disease, for which cholecystectomy was done.
All patients anterior and posterior vagus identified and preserved.
On follow up 80% of patients had resolution of symptoms, 18% needed intermittent PPI.
At a median follow up of 18 months, no surgical failure was noted in endoscopy.
Conclusion Laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure when operated in a high volume centre by an expert surgeon.

Related Results

Is It Safe to Combine a Fundoplication to Sleeve Gastrectomy? Review of Literature
Is It Safe to Combine a Fundoplication to Sleeve Gastrectomy? Review of Literature
Background and Objectives: The rising numbers of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) procedures now being performed worldwide will likely be followed by an increasing number of p...
Tailored Antireflux Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Effectiveness and Risk of Postoperative Dysphagia
Tailored Antireflux Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Effectiveness and Risk of Postoperative Dysphagia
AbstractThe Nissen fundoplication is not the proper antireflux procedure for patients with poor esophageal peristalsis as it does not strengthen impaired esophageal peristalsis. Th...
ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF HERNIAS
ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF HERNIAS
Minimally invasive surgery has revolutionized the treatment of various medical conditions, offering significant benefits in terms of recovery and fewer complications. In the field ...
Lap. Nissen Fundoplication leads to better respiratory Symptom Control than Toupet in the long-term of 20 years
Lap. Nissen Fundoplication leads to better respiratory Symptom Control than Toupet in the long-term of 20 years
Abstract Introduction: Since we are performing anti-reflux surgery for thirty years, it was worth re-examining our patients on the long-term to enlarge the body of evidence...
614. LAPAROSCOPIC RE DO FUNDOPLICATION
614. LAPAROSCOPIC RE DO FUNDOPLICATION
Abstract Background Laparoscopic fundoplication though an effective form of therapy for patients with refractory gastroesophagea...

Back to Top