Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy 

View through CrossRef
Background Intrathecal neostigmine injection produces analgesia in volunteers and reduces hypotension from intrathecal bupivacaine in animals. Initial clinical trials with neostigmine studied doses of more than 100 microg, but animal studies suggest that smaller doses may be effective. In addition, all controlled clinical trials of neostigmine have come from one Brazilian university. This multicenter, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effects of 25-75 microg intrathecal neostigmine on analgesia and blood pressure in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Methods After institutional review board approval was obtained at the three university centers, and after patients gave informed consent, 92 women scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of 2 ml bupivacaine, 0.75%, in dextrose plus either 1 ml saline or 25, 50, or 75 microg neostigmine. Blood pressure, heart rate, pain and nausea (both assessed by visual analog scale), and intravenous morphine use were recorded during surgery and at specified intervals afterward. Results Morphine use was reduced similarly by all doses of neostigmine. Only the 75-microg dose of neostigmine increased the nausea score in the recovery room. The incidence of treatment for nausea was greater in patients receiving neostigmine (61%) than in those receiving saline placebo (29%) and was unaffected by neostigmine dose. Neostigmine did not reduce the incidence of hypotension from bupivacaine. Conclusion These data in patients after vaginal hysterectomy suggest that analgesia from intrathecal neostigmine may occur at doses less than 50 microg. In these doses, neostigmine does not reduce spinal bupivacaine-induced hypotension but may increase the need for treatment of nausea.
Title: A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy 
Description:
Background Intrathecal neostigmine injection produces analgesia in volunteers and reduces hypotension from intrathecal bupivacaine in animals.
Initial clinical trials with neostigmine studied doses of more than 100 microg, but animal studies suggest that smaller doses may be effective.
In addition, all controlled clinical trials of neostigmine have come from one Brazilian university.
This multicenter, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effects of 25-75 microg intrathecal neostigmine on analgesia and blood pressure in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.
Methods After institutional review board approval was obtained at the three university centers, and after patients gave informed consent, 92 women scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of 2 ml bupivacaine, 0.
75%, in dextrose plus either 1 ml saline or 25, 50, or 75 microg neostigmine.
Blood pressure, heart rate, pain and nausea (both assessed by visual analog scale), and intravenous morphine use were recorded during surgery and at specified intervals afterward.
Results Morphine use was reduced similarly by all doses of neostigmine.
Only the 75-microg dose of neostigmine increased the nausea score in the recovery room.
The incidence of treatment for nausea was greater in patients receiving neostigmine (61%) than in those receiving saline placebo (29%) and was unaffected by neostigmine dose.
Neostigmine did not reduce the incidence of hypotension from bupivacaine.
Conclusion These data in patients after vaginal hysterectomy suggest that analgesia from intrathecal neostigmine may occur at doses less than 50 microg.
In these doses, neostigmine does not reduce spinal bupivacaine-induced hypotension but may increase the need for treatment of nausea.

Related Results

Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
ABDOMINAL VERSUS VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
ABDOMINAL VERSUS VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
Objective: To evaluate abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy in relation to operative and post operative complications.Design: Single centre cross sectional study. Place and durati...
Radical Hysterectomy Versus Simple Hysterectomy and Brachytherapy for Patients with Stage II Endometrial Cancer
Radical Hysterectomy Versus Simple Hysterectomy and Brachytherapy for Patients with Stage II Endometrial Cancer
Abstract BACKGROUND: To compare the survival outcome between radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy with implants radiation in patients with stage II endometrial canc...
Epidural Neostigmine Combined with Sufentanil Provides Balanced and Selective Analgesia in Early Labor
Epidural Neostigmine Combined with Sufentanil Provides Balanced and Selective Analgesia in Early Labor
Background This study evaluated the efficacy of an epidural single dose of neostigmine combined with sufentanil to provide selective and balanced analgesia at the begin...
Hysterectomy and mental health status, findings from Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA)
Hysterectomy and mental health status, findings from Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA)
Abstract Background Many middle-aged and older women have undergone hysterectomy in their lifetime. The mental health outcomes of hysterectomy are controversial. This stud...
Resurgence of vaginal route of hysterectomy: Comparison based outcomes of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
Resurgence of vaginal route of hysterectomy: Comparison based outcomes of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
Objective: To determine the preferable route of hysterectomy by comparing the intra-operative and post-operative complications of non descent vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hy...

Back to Top