Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ergonomic Temperature Limits for Handheld Electronic Devices

View through CrossRef
In the drive towards smaller but more powerful electronic systems, effective thermal management issues continue to be among the key challenges facing the electronic industry. With this drive comes increasing heat production that must be removed for a satisfactory and safe operation. In large systems, one of the main challenges is how to achieve acceptable junction temperature of components such as microprocessors. In small systems such as handheld devices, however, one of the main challenges is maintaining the enclosure temperature below certain threshold so that they can be handled and operated without much discomfort. Whether the device is cooled passively or actively, a portion of the total heat generated by components is dissipated through the enclosure. This heat is then dissipated from the skin by radiation and natural convection into the ambient, and by conduction into any body that is in touch with it. So, when a device is held by hand, part of the heat produced will flow into the hand by conduction. The higher the temperature of the enclosure, the greater the heat transfer into the hand will be. Thus, whereas some devices feel cool to the touch, others will feel hot when touched. In order to characterize touch comfort, we must answer some basic questions: What determines whether a device feels hot or not? That is, what are the variables that control touch comfort? Is there a maximum skin temperature limit that we can say is acceptable for touch comfort? In this paper, we shall attempt to answer these and related questions. Among the results we report in this paper include that touch comfort not only depends on the absolute enclosure temperature of the device but also on the thermal conductivity of the enclosure. Materials with high conductivity transfer greater amount of heat into the hand than materials with low conductivity. Thus, a device with aluminum enclosure will feel hotter when touched than a device with plastic enclosure dissipating the same amount of heat. Further, depending on enclosure material type and ambient conditions, one can identify a skin temperature limit beyond which touch comfort deteriorates and becomes unacceptable. For the form factor studied, it was determined that the skin temperature limit for a plastic enclosure was about 45 C, and for aluminum enclosure it was about 41 C.
Title: Ergonomic Temperature Limits for Handheld Electronic Devices
Description:
In the drive towards smaller but more powerful electronic systems, effective thermal management issues continue to be among the key challenges facing the electronic industry.
With this drive comes increasing heat production that must be removed for a satisfactory and safe operation.
In large systems, one of the main challenges is how to achieve acceptable junction temperature of components such as microprocessors.
In small systems such as handheld devices, however, one of the main challenges is maintaining the enclosure temperature below certain threshold so that they can be handled and operated without much discomfort.
Whether the device is cooled passively or actively, a portion of the total heat generated by components is dissipated through the enclosure.
This heat is then dissipated from the skin by radiation and natural convection into the ambient, and by conduction into any body that is in touch with it.
So, when a device is held by hand, part of the heat produced will flow into the hand by conduction.
The higher the temperature of the enclosure, the greater the heat transfer into the hand will be.
Thus, whereas some devices feel cool to the touch, others will feel hot when touched.
In order to characterize touch comfort, we must answer some basic questions: What determines whether a device feels hot or not? That is, what are the variables that control touch comfort? Is there a maximum skin temperature limit that we can say is acceptable for touch comfort? In this paper, we shall attempt to answer these and related questions.
Among the results we report in this paper include that touch comfort not only depends on the absolute enclosure temperature of the device but also on the thermal conductivity of the enclosure.
Materials with high conductivity transfer greater amount of heat into the hand than materials with low conductivity.
Thus, a device with aluminum enclosure will feel hotter when touched than a device with plastic enclosure dissipating the same amount of heat.
Further, depending on enclosure material type and ambient conditions, one can identify a skin temperature limit beyond which touch comfort deteriorates and becomes unacceptable.
For the form factor studied, it was determined that the skin temperature limit for a plastic enclosure was about 45 C, and for aluminum enclosure it was about 41 C.

Related Results

Handheld Programming Languages and Environments
Handheld Programming Languages and Environments
Mobile commerce is defined as the exchange or buying and selling of commodities, services, or information on the Internet through the use of mobile, handheld devices such as smart ...
ERGONOMIC ASSESSMENTS IN ALUMINUM RECYCLING: A STRATEGIC IMPERATIVE FOR ENTREPRENEURS
ERGONOMIC ASSESSMENTS IN ALUMINUM RECYCLING: A STRATEGIC IMPERATIVE FOR ENTREPRENEURS
The recycling and re-manufacturing of aluminum utensils in local facilities provide notable economic and environmental advantages. However, ergonomic considerations are critical fo...
How do medical students utilize mobile handheld devices in learning?
How do medical students utilize mobile handheld devices in learning?
Introduction. The phenomenon of increased and ubiquitous use of mobile handheld devices by medical students triggered the interest to explore how these students u...
Handheld ultrasound to reduce requests for inappropriate echocardiogram (HURRIE)
Handheld ultrasound to reduce requests for inappropriate echocardiogram (HURRIE)
Abstract BackgroundHandheld ultrasound could provide sufficient information to satisfy the clinical questions underlying ‘rarely appropriate’ echo...
Kajian Ergonomika Terhadap Penggunaan Mesin Penggoreng Vacuum
Kajian Ergonomika Terhadap Penggunaan Mesin Penggoreng Vacuum
Agricultural machine tools with technology can help processes in agriculture so that time is more effective, cost-effective and improves the quality or quality of plants or product...
Summoning Method using Freehand Interaction for Occluded Object Selection in Handheld Augmented Reality
Summoning Method using Freehand Interaction for Occluded Object Selection in Handheld Augmented Reality
Ray-casting is often used for object manipulation that intersects with the ray that uses the intersection between rays extending from the user and a virtual object. In Augmented Re...
Personal Use of Handheld Fetal Doppler Monitors by Women in New Zealand
Personal Use of Handheld Fetal Doppler Monitors by Women in New Zealand
<div>This qualitative descriptive study explores what factors are driving women in New Zealand to use handheld fetal Doppler monitors during their pregnancy. This is a little...
Personal Use of Handheld Fetal Doppler Monitors by Women in New Zealand
Personal Use of Handheld Fetal Doppler Monitors by Women in New Zealand
<p dir="ltr">This qualitative descriptive study explores what factors are driving women in New Zealand to use handheld fetal Doppler monitors during their pregnancy. This is ...

Back to Top