Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ergonomic Temperature Limits for Handheld Electronic Devices

View through CrossRef
In the drive towards smaller but more powerful electronic systems, effective thermal management issues continue to be among the key challenges facing the electronic industry. With this drive comes increasing heat production that must be removed for a satisfactory and safe operation. In large systems, one of the main challenges is how to achieve acceptable junction temperature of components such as microprocessors. In small systems such as handheld devices, however, one of the main challenges is maintaining the enclosure temperature below certain threshold so that they can be handled and operated without much discomfort. Whether the device is cooled passively or actively, a portion of the total heat generated by components is dissipated through the enclosure. This heat is then dissipated from the skin by radiation and natural convection into the ambient, and by conduction into any body that is in touch with it. So, when a device is held by hand, part of the heat produced will flow into the hand by conduction. The higher the temperature of the enclosure, the greater the heat transfer into the hand will be. Thus, whereas some devices feel cool to the touch, others will feel hot when touched. In order to characterize touch comfort, we must answer some basic questions: What determines whether a device feels hot or not? That is, what are the variables that control touch comfort? Is there a maximum skin temperature limit that we can say is acceptable for touch comfort? In this paper, we shall attempt to answer these and related questions. Among the results we report in this paper include that touch comfort not only depends on the absolute enclosure temperature of the device but also on the thermal conductivity of the enclosure. Materials with high conductivity transfer greater amount of heat into the hand than materials with low conductivity. Thus, a device with aluminum enclosure will feel hotter when touched than a device with plastic enclosure dissipating the same amount of heat. Further, depending on enclosure material type and ambient conditions, one can identify a skin temperature limit beyond which touch comfort deteriorates and becomes unacceptable. For the form factor studied, it was determined that the skin temperature limit for a plastic enclosure was about 45 C, and for aluminum enclosure it was about 41 C.
Title: Ergonomic Temperature Limits for Handheld Electronic Devices
Description:
In the drive towards smaller but more powerful electronic systems, effective thermal management issues continue to be among the key challenges facing the electronic industry.
With this drive comes increasing heat production that must be removed for a satisfactory and safe operation.
In large systems, one of the main challenges is how to achieve acceptable junction temperature of components such as microprocessors.
In small systems such as handheld devices, however, one of the main challenges is maintaining the enclosure temperature below certain threshold so that they can be handled and operated without much discomfort.
Whether the device is cooled passively or actively, a portion of the total heat generated by components is dissipated through the enclosure.
This heat is then dissipated from the skin by radiation and natural convection into the ambient, and by conduction into any body that is in touch with it.
So, when a device is held by hand, part of the heat produced will flow into the hand by conduction.
The higher the temperature of the enclosure, the greater the heat transfer into the hand will be.
Thus, whereas some devices feel cool to the touch, others will feel hot when touched.
In order to characterize touch comfort, we must answer some basic questions: What determines whether a device feels hot or not? That is, what are the variables that control touch comfort? Is there a maximum skin temperature limit that we can say is acceptable for touch comfort? In this paper, we shall attempt to answer these and related questions.
Among the results we report in this paper include that touch comfort not only depends on the absolute enclosure temperature of the device but also on the thermal conductivity of the enclosure.
Materials with high conductivity transfer greater amount of heat into the hand than materials with low conductivity.
Thus, a device with aluminum enclosure will feel hotter when touched than a device with plastic enclosure dissipating the same amount of heat.
Further, depending on enclosure material type and ambient conditions, one can identify a skin temperature limit beyond which touch comfort deteriorates and becomes unacceptable.
For the form factor studied, it was determined that the skin temperature limit for a plastic enclosure was about 45 C, and for aluminum enclosure it was about 41 C.

Related Results

Handheld Programming Languages and Environments
Handheld Programming Languages and Environments
Mobile commerce is defined as the exchange or buying and selling of commodities, services, or information on the Internet through the use of mobile, handheld devices such as smart ...
Handheld ultrasound to reduce requests for inappropriate echocardiogram (HURRIE)
Handheld ultrasound to reduce requests for inappropriate echocardiogram (HURRIE)
Abstract BackgroundHandheld ultrasound could provide sufficient information to satisfy the clinical questions underlying ‘rarely appropriate’ echo...
PREVALENCE OF MIGRAINE AMONG NURSES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH NURSING STATION ERGONOMICS
PREVALENCE OF MIGRAINE AMONG NURSES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH NURSING STATION ERGONOMICS
Background: Ergonomics, the science of optimizing interactions between individuals and their work environment, plays a crucial role in improving efficiency, comfort, safety, and he...
Laparoscopic Ergonomics: Where Do We Stand?
Laparoscopic Ergonomics: Where Do We Stand?
Background Laparoscopic surgery has become widely accepted in gynecological practice due to its clinical benefits for patients. However, it introduces significa...
Ergonomic Integration in Community-Based Waste Management Systems: A Case Study of a Joyful Integrated Farming System
Ergonomic Integration in Community-Based Waste Management Systems: A Case Study of a Joyful Integrated Farming System
Background, Manual waste management remains prevalent in community-based systems, particularly in developing countries, where limited mechanization and informal work practices elev...
Multi-dimensional Ergonomic Evaluation Method for Cockpit Light Environment
Multi-dimensional Ergonomic Evaluation Method for Cockpit Light Environment
To instruct interior lighting design of aviation cockpit and ensure the work efficiency and comfort of pilots, and reduce safety accidents caused by light environment and visual fa...
ERGONOMIC RISK ASSESSMENT ON SELECTED HOT-WORK WORKERS AT COMPANY XXX
ERGONOMIC RISK ASSESSMENT ON SELECTED HOT-WORK WORKERS AT COMPANY XXX
Company XXX is a factory that involving manufacturing of offshore containers in where the hot works are one of the crucial activities in fabrication and structuring the framework o...

Back to Top