Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Non-intubated spontaneous ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
It remains unclear whether non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is comparable or advantageous compared with conventional intubated VATS. Thus, we systematically assessed the feasibility and safety of non-intubated VATS compared with intubated VATS perioperatively for the treatment of different thoracic diseases. An extensive search of literature databases was conducted. Perioperative outcomes were compared between 2 types of operations. The time trend of the overall results was evaluated through a cumulative meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses of different thoracic diseases and study types were examined. Twenty-seven studies including 2537 patients were included in the analysis. A total of 1283 patients underwent non-intubated VATS; intubated VATS was performed on the other 1254 patients. Overall, the non-intubated VATS group had fewer postoperative overall complications [odds ratios (OR) 0.505; P < 0.001]; shorter postoperative fasting times [standardized mean difference (SMD) −2.653; P < 0.001]; shorter hospital stays (SMD −0.581; P < 0.001); shorter operative times (SMD −0.174; P = 0.041); shorter anaesthesia times (SMD −0.710; P < 0.001) and a lower mortality rate (OR 0.123; P = 0.020). Non-intubated VATS may be a safe and feasible alternative to intubated VATS and provide a more rapid postoperative rehabilitation time than conventional intubated VATS.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Non-intubated spontaneous ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract
It remains unclear whether non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is comparable or advantageous compared with conventional intubated VATS.
Thus, we systematically assessed the feasibility and safety of non-intubated VATS compared with intubated VATS perioperatively for the treatment of different thoracic diseases.
An extensive search of literature databases was conducted.
Perioperative outcomes were compared between 2 types of operations.
The time trend of the overall results was evaluated through a cumulative meta-analysis.
Subgroup analyses of different thoracic diseases and study types were examined.
Twenty-seven studies including 2537 patients were included in the analysis.
A total of 1283 patients underwent non-intubated VATS; intubated VATS was performed on the other 1254 patients.
Overall, the non-intubated VATS group had fewer postoperative overall complications [odds ratios (OR) 0.
505; P < 0.
001]; shorter postoperative fasting times [standardized mean difference (SMD) −2.
653; P < 0.
001]; shorter hospital stays (SMD −0.
581; P < 0.
001); shorter operative times (SMD −0.
174; P = 0.
041); shorter anaesthesia times (SMD −0.
710; P < 0.
001) and a lower mortality rate (OR 0.
123; P = 0.
020).
Non-intubated VATS may be a safe and feasible alternative to intubated VATS and provide a more rapid postoperative rehabilitation time than conventional intubated VATS.
Related Results
Surgical Treament of the Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis using Videothoracoscopic Interventions
Surgical Treament of the Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis using Videothoracoscopic Interventions
Introduction. Pulmonary tuberculosis is a serious problem as in Ukraine as throughout the world. The number of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis is increasing year by year, whic...
Analysis of conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lung resection
Analysis of conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lung resection
Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has been widely adopted. However, conversion to open thoracotomy is still necessary when intraoperative complications are encountere...
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer after induction therapy
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer after induction therapy
Background Although thoracoscopic surgery is widely performed for early-stage lung cancer, only a few small studies have evaluated the role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery ...
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for nontuberculous mycobacterial infection
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for nontuberculous mycobacterial infection
Background The number of patients with nontuberculous mycobacterium infection is increasing in Japan, and therefore surgical treatment is also being applied with increasing frequen...
Video assisted thoracoscopic management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
Video assisted thoracoscopic management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the outcome of Video assisted Thoracoscopy (Vats) in Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax (PSP).
Methods: This case series was carried out fr...
The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: The efficacy of erector spinae plane block for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of ...
Uniportal Thoracoscopic Approach For Pulmonary Hydatid Cyst: Preliminary Results
Uniportal Thoracoscopic Approach For Pulmonary Hydatid Cyst: Preliminary Results
Purpose:
Pulmonary hydatid cyst is a preventable parasitary disease with high prevalence in low-medium income countries. Thoracoscopic approach is seen in the literatur...
MTP3.03 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between video-Assisted and robotic-assisted thoracic Surgery: A Systematic review and meta-Analysis
MTP3.03 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between video-Assisted and robotic-assisted thoracic Surgery: A Systematic review and meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objective
This meta-analysis aims to compare the perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and r...

