Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Anything Grows: Some Remarks On "The Dawn of Everything" by David Graeber and David Wengrow

View through CrossRef
The article is a detailed review of The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity by David Graeber and David Wengrow. The author maps out a problematic context of world history as it is being written nowadays. So called Anthropocene basically means the impossibility of world history written exclusively from a human point of view. Now, world history is to be written from the perspective of a NonHuman Other (be it carbon footprint, microbes, technology, and so on). Moreover, this Other is regularly elaborated within the framework of big data. Graeber and Wengrow contest this trend, but, at the same time, endorse it by other means. NonHuman Other, chosen by the authors, is the human race itself in its “indigenous” state. Data, accumulated by archeology and anthropology, allows them to refute and ridicule the narrative of “Agricultural revolution” which suggested a sudden shift from hunters’ and foragers’ way of life to first farmers with their sedentary existence conducive to highly hierarchized societies and centralization. But Graeber and Wengrow overlook the fact that any narrative always functions as a skeletal generalization, and it is the reason why their arguments sometimes reveal misunderstanding of stylistic and strategic peculiarities of different types or genres of parascientific writing (including punditry). Graeber and Wengrow do not substitute any other narrative for “Agricultural revolution”, they content themselves with undermining it by a plethora of anthropological data presenting a multitude of outliers communities. Striving to dismantle the basics of Rousseauist myth (implying abundance of indigenous life and “fall” into civilization), the authors actually rehabilitate it, at least partially. So native Americans supposedly lived in a much freer and richer society that we do. At the end of the day, the culprit of the fall into a civilized state is declared to be a tripartite power taken almost for granted.
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Title: Anything Grows: Some Remarks On "The Dawn of Everything" by David Graeber and David Wengrow
Description:
The article is a detailed review of The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity by David Graeber and David Wengrow.
The author maps out a problematic context of world history as it is being written nowadays.
So called Anthropocene basically means the impossibility of world history written exclusively from a human point of view.
Now, world history is to be written from the perspective of a NonHuman Other (be it carbon footprint, microbes, technology, and so on).
Moreover, this Other is regularly elaborated within the framework of big data.
Graeber and Wengrow contest this trend, but, at the same time, endorse it by other means.
NonHuman Other, chosen by the authors, is the human race itself in its “indigenous” state.
Data, accumulated by archeology and anthropology, allows them to refute and ridicule the narrative of “Agricultural revolution” which suggested a sudden shift from hunters’ and foragers’ way of life to first farmers with their sedentary existence conducive to highly hierarchized societies and centralization.
But Graeber and Wengrow overlook the fact that any narrative always functions as a skeletal generalization, and it is the reason why their arguments sometimes reveal misunderstanding of stylistic and strategic peculiarities of different types or genres of parascientific writing (including punditry).
Graeber and Wengrow do not substitute any other narrative for “Agricultural revolution”, they content themselves with undermining it by a plethora of anthropological data presenting a multitude of outliers communities.
Striving to dismantle the basics of Rousseauist myth (implying abundance of indigenous life and “fall” into civilization), the authors actually rehabilitate it, at least partially.
So native Americans supposedly lived in a much freer and richer society that we do.
At the end of the day, the culprit of the fall into a civilized state is declared to be a tripartite power taken almost for granted.

Related Results

On atmosphere and darkness at Australia’s Anzac Day Dawn Service
On atmosphere and darkness at Australia’s Anzac Day Dawn Service
The Anzac Dawn Service is an established and increasingly well-commemorated Australian national day. Its rhythms include music, readings of ritual texts and moments of scripted sil...
Archaeological research in the Petra Valley: preliminary remarks from the excavation at the Corinthian Tomb
Archaeological research in the Petra Valley: preliminary remarks from the excavation at the Corinthian Tomb
Archaeological research in the Petra Valley: preliminary remarks from the excavation at the Corinthian Tomb The Italian Archaeological Mission ‘Medieval Petra’: archaeology o...
Humanities
Humanities
James E. Côté and Anton L. Allahar, Lowering Higher Education: The Rise of Corporate Universities and the Fall of Liberal Education, reviewed by glen a. jones Daniel Coleman and S...
The Dying Storm
The Dying Storm
A phrase of Mr. Middleton Murry in his chapter on the imagery of Shakespeare suggests some interesting possibilities of literary speculation. Noting the odd association of dogs and...
The Art Of Shavian Political Drama
The Art Of Shavian Political Drama
THE UNEMPLOYED OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION of the thirties are singing these verses of Edward Carpenter outside number ten Downing Street at the close of Bernard Shaw's On the Rocks "t...
Some Remarks on Konrad Bayer: Dark Romanticism and Surrealism in Postwar Vienna
Some Remarks on Konrad Bayer: Dark Romanticism and Surrealism in Postwar Vienna
In “Some Remarks on Konrad Bayer” Oswald Wiener reflects on his deceased friend and collaborator. Arguing that Bayer's personal presence was more influential than his literary work...
Palestinian radiocarbon dating: a reply to James Mellaart
Palestinian radiocarbon dating: a reply to James Mellaart
James Mellaart’s attempt to demonstrate a ‘high’ chronology for Egypt and the Near East for the period of c. 4000-1500 BC will undoubtedly stimulate much discussion among historian...

Back to Top