Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Palestinian radiocarbon dating: a reply to James Mellaart

View through CrossRef
James Mellaart’s attempt to demonstrate a ‘high’ chronology for Egypt and the Near East for the period of c. 4000-1500 BC will undoubtedly stimulate much discussion among historians and archaeologists. He has forcefully pointed out various problems which have arisen in trying to reconcile the standard historical chronologies established between and within individual countries. It is probably true that some scholars have treated the so-called ‘middle’ chronology as if it was almost sacred, and certainly some individuals have ignored radiocarbon dates (especially calibrated dates) if they appeared to be in conflict with results obtained from traditional historical and archaeological sources. But neither these faults, nor others pointed out by the author, justify his own methods of trying to demolish the middle chronology in favour of a significantly higher one. Since elsewhere in this issue Barry Kemp is presenting a critical review of Mellaart’s Egyptian historical data, and has included some remarks on the Egyptian radiocarbon dates, I will restrict my own remarks here largely to the Palestinian radiocarbon materials, and will only comment on the Egyptian C14 dates as they pertain to Palestinian Early Bronze Age chronology.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Palestinian radiocarbon dating: a reply to James Mellaart
Description:
James Mellaart’s attempt to demonstrate a ‘high’ chronology for Egypt and the Near East for the period of c.
4000-1500 BC will undoubtedly stimulate much discussion among historians and archaeologists.
He has forcefully pointed out various problems which have arisen in trying to reconcile the standard historical chronologies established between and within individual countries.
It is probably true that some scholars have treated the so-called ‘middle’ chronology as if it was almost sacred, and certainly some individuals have ignored radiocarbon dates (especially calibrated dates) if they appeared to be in conflict with results obtained from traditional historical and archaeological sources.
But neither these faults, nor others pointed out by the author, justify his own methods of trying to demolish the middle chronology in favour of a significantly higher one.
Since elsewhere in this issue Barry Kemp is presenting a critical review of Mellaart’s Egyptian historical data, and has included some remarks on the Egyptian radiocarbon dates, I will restrict my own remarks here largely to the Palestinian radiocarbon materials, and will only comment on the Egyptian C14 dates as they pertain to Palestinian Early Bronze Age chronology.

Related Results

On Jean-Luc Godard, Jean Genet and representing the Palestinians
On Jean-Luc Godard, Jean Genet and representing the Palestinians
In July 2014, the people who took part to the banned demonstration in Paris against the intervention of the Israeli Defence Forces in Gaza were expressing their support of a besieg...
The cultural psychology of Palestinian youth: A narrative approach
The cultural psychology of Palestinian youth: A narrative approach
Contemporary Palestinian youth engage with a tragic master narrative of loss and dispossession supported by the social structure of ongoing intractable conflict and Israeli militar...
Witnessing Interparental Violence and Acceptance of Dating Violence as Predictors for Teen Dating Violence Victimization
Witnessing Interparental Violence and Acceptance of Dating Violence as Predictors for Teen Dating Violence Victimization
We examined the association between witnessing interparental violence, attitudes about dating violence, and physical and psychological teen dating violence (TDV) victimization. Par...
Newly-Identified Type of Late Antique Palestinian Amphora
Newly-Identified Type of Late Antique Palestinian Amphora
This study discusses a new type of Late Antique (second half of seventh century ad) Palestinian commercial amphora. Archaeological finds from surveys and excavations, along with pe...
One Sky: The Palestinian Writer Liyāna Badr between Two Periods
One Sky: The Palestinian Writer Liyāna Badr between Two Periods
Abstract The present article illustrates how the change in the geographic location of Liyāna Badr, one of the prominent Palestinian women writers, influenced her writing in themati...
C.E. FERGUSON’S LOST REPLY TO JOAN ROBINSON ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL
C.E. FERGUSON’S LOST REPLY TO JOAN ROBINSON ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL
In 1971, Joan Robinson entered into a debate with the American neoclassical economist C.E. Ferguson in the Canadian Journal of Economics...
‘And they shall Beat their Swords into…Scrapers’: Two Case Studies in the Vocabulary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic
‘And they shall Beat their Swords into…Scrapers’: Two Case Studies in the Vocabulary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic
Abstract The paper discusses two agricultural implements mentioned briefly in Talmud Yerushalmi (also known as ‘Palestinian Talmud’; edited c. 375 ce), in vernacular...
Archaeomagnetic Dating in the American Southwest
Archaeomagnetic Dating in the American Southwest
Although archaeomagnetic dating seems straightforward in principle, there are practical limitations which are not generally understood. Unlike rate-dependent processes such as isot...

Back to Top