Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluation of the frictional resistance between different bracket types, archwires and ligation materials: An in-vitro study
View through CrossRef
In orthodontic treatment, brackets need to slide along the archwire to allow for alignment of the teeth. The lesser the friction between the bracket and the archwire, the easier it is to align the teeth and the lighter the forces required to make such movements. In recent years, patients’ esthetic demands have driven the field of orthodontics to find alternatives to conventional stainless steel bracket systems. While ceramic brackets meet the esthetic demands, their inferior frictional characteristics have always been an issue for orthodontists.The present in-vitro research study evaluates and compares the frictional resistance between various types of brackets, archwire materials and ligation methods. The purpose of the study was to equate the frictional resistance among 12 different groups using the universal testing machine, so as to recognize the factors involved in the in-vitro appraisal of resistance to sliding (RS) and inferring their clinical implications. In this study, 120 pre-adjusted edgewise upper central incisor brackets with MBT 0.022″ slot were used, which included 40 standard metal brackets, 40 ceramic brackets, 20 self-ligating metal brackets and 20 self-ligating ceramic brackets. 0.019″ x 0.025″ SS (stainless steel) archwires, esthetic archwires, Teflon-coated ligatures and conventional elastic modules to ligate the archwire to the brackets except in self-ligating brackets, were used. The average frictional resistance of Group A10 was the minimum succeeded by A9, A12, A4, A11, A8, A3, A7, A2, A6, A1 and A5. In the comparison of the mean frictional resistance of 12 different groups, the ANOVA test showed noticeably different frictional resistance amongst the groups (F=745.80, P< 0.001). Self-ligating metal bracket combinations with different archwires showed a significantly smaller magnitude of friction than self-ligating ceramic, metal and ceramic bracket combinations. Teflon-coated ligature combinations possess less friction in comparison with conventional elastomeric module combinations.
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Title: Evaluation of the frictional resistance between different bracket types, archwires and ligation materials: An in-vitro study
Description:
In orthodontic treatment, brackets need to slide along the archwire to allow for alignment of the teeth.
The lesser the friction between the bracket and the archwire, the easier it is to align the teeth and the lighter the forces required to make such movements.
In recent years, patients’ esthetic demands have driven the field of orthodontics to find alternatives to conventional stainless steel bracket systems.
While ceramic brackets meet the esthetic demands, their inferior frictional characteristics have always been an issue for orthodontists.
The present in-vitro research study evaluates and compares the frictional resistance between various types of brackets, archwire materials and ligation methods.
The purpose of the study was to equate the frictional resistance among 12 different groups using the universal testing machine, so as to recognize the factors involved in the in-vitro appraisal of resistance to sliding (RS) and inferring their clinical implications.
In this study, 120 pre-adjusted edgewise upper central incisor brackets with MBT 0.
022″ slot were used, which included 40 standard metal brackets, 40 ceramic brackets, 20 self-ligating metal brackets and 20 self-ligating ceramic brackets.
0.
019″ x 0.
025″ SS (stainless steel) archwires, esthetic archwires, Teflon-coated ligatures and conventional elastic modules to ligate the archwire to the brackets except in self-ligating brackets, were used.
The average frictional resistance of Group A10 was the minimum succeeded by A9, A12, A4, A11, A8, A3, A7, A2, A6, A1 and A5.
In the comparison of the mean frictional resistance of 12 different groups, the ANOVA test showed noticeably different frictional resistance amongst the groups (F=745.
80, P< 0.
001).
Self-ligating metal bracket combinations with different archwires showed a significantly smaller magnitude of friction than self-ligating ceramic, metal and ceramic bracket combinations.
Teflon-coated ligature combinations possess less friction in comparison with conventional elastomeric module combinations.
Related Results
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Effects of bracket design on critical contact angle
Effects of bracket design on critical contact angle
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To explore how the position of the bracket slots relative to the archwire influences the friction between them, and how bracket des...
Impact of Simulated Gastric Acid on Surface Roughness and Frictional Resistance of Orthodontic Archwires: An In vitro Study
Impact of Simulated Gastric Acid on Surface Roughness and Frictional Resistance of Orthodontic Archwires: An In vitro Study
Introduction: Acid regurgitation caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can lead to decreases in intraoral pH below the critical pH for orthodontic appliances. Exposure of bra...
A Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance of Conventional, Teflon and Epoxy Coated Stainless Steel Archwires in Metal, Ceramic Brackets – An In vitro Study
A Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance of Conventional, Teflon and Epoxy Coated Stainless Steel Archwires in Metal, Ceramic Brackets – An In vitro Study
Aim and Objectives: To evaluate the frictional resistance of Conventional, Teflon, and Epoxy coated stainless steel archwires in Metal, Ceramic brackets.
Materials and Method...
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts
Abstract
Aims
To compare the static frictional resistance of ceramic brackets with a conventional slot (Allure), a glazed slot (...
Understanding the Effects of Sterilisation Methods on Orthodontic Archwires Properties: A Review
Understanding the Effects of Sterilisation Methods on Orthodontic Archwires Properties: A Review
Sterilisation is the removal of all microorganisms, vegetative or spore-forming, from an article, surface or medium that can be accomplished through steam autoclaving, dry heat and...
Variation in form of mandibular, light, round, preformed NiTi archwires
Variation in form of mandibular, light, round, preformed NiTi archwires
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To evaluate the variation in form of nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires by comparing them with the dental arch form of normal Japane...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...

