Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Beyond over- or under-sampling: autistic children’s inflexibility in sampling costly information

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundEfficient information sampling is crucial for human inference and decision-making, even for young children. Information sampling is also closely associated with the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), since both the social interaction difficulties and repetitive behaviors suggest that autistic people may sample information from the environment distinctively. Previous research on information sampling in ASD focused mainly on adolescents and adults, and on whether they over- or under-sample. The specific ways in which autistic children sample information, especially when facing explicit costs and adapting to environmental changes, remain unclear.MethodsWe employed an adapted bead task to investigate the sampling behavior of 24 autistic and 41 neurotypical children, matched for age and IQ. In each trial of our experiment, children gathered information about an unknown target isle by drawing samples from it and then guessed the target between two isles based on their samples. In conditions where sampling was costly, children needed to weigh the benefits of information against the costs of acquiring additional samples. Through computational modeling and intricate behavioral measures, we revealed how the two groups of children differed in sampling decisions and underlying cognitive mechanisms.ResultsUnder conditions involving costs, autistic children showed less efficient sampling than their neurotypical peers. This inefficiency was due to their increased variability in the number of samples taken across trials rather than a systematic bias. Computational models indicated that while both groups shared a similar decision process, autistic children’s sampling decisions were less influenced by dynamic changes and more driven by recent evidence, thus leading to their increased sampling variation and reduced efficiency.LimitationsTo refine ASD subtyping and correlate symptom severity with behavioral characteristics and computational findings, future research may need larger participant groups and more comprehensive clinical assessments.ConclusionsThis study reveals an inefficiency of autistic children in information sampling and tracks down this inefficiency to their increased sampling variability, primarily due to their cognitive preference for more local and static information. These findings are consistent with several influential behavioral theories of ASD and highlight the needs of a multi-level understanding of cognitive flexibility in ASD.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Title: Beyond over- or under-sampling: autistic children’s inflexibility in sampling costly information
Description:
AbstractBackgroundEfficient information sampling is crucial for human inference and decision-making, even for young children.
Information sampling is also closely associated with the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), since both the social interaction difficulties and repetitive behaviors suggest that autistic people may sample information from the environment distinctively.
Previous research on information sampling in ASD focused mainly on adolescents and adults, and on whether they over- or under-sample.
The specific ways in which autistic children sample information, especially when facing explicit costs and adapting to environmental changes, remain unclear.
MethodsWe employed an adapted bead task to investigate the sampling behavior of 24 autistic and 41 neurotypical children, matched for age and IQ.
In each trial of our experiment, children gathered information about an unknown target isle by drawing samples from it and then guessed the target between two isles based on their samples.
In conditions where sampling was costly, children needed to weigh the benefits of information against the costs of acquiring additional samples.
Through computational modeling and intricate behavioral measures, we revealed how the two groups of children differed in sampling decisions and underlying cognitive mechanisms.
ResultsUnder conditions involving costs, autistic children showed less efficient sampling than their neurotypical peers.
This inefficiency was due to their increased variability in the number of samples taken across trials rather than a systematic bias.
Computational models indicated that while both groups shared a similar decision process, autistic children’s sampling decisions were less influenced by dynamic changes and more driven by recent evidence, thus leading to their increased sampling variation and reduced efficiency.
LimitationsTo refine ASD subtyping and correlate symptom severity with behavioral characteristics and computational findings, future research may need larger participant groups and more comprehensive clinical assessments.
ConclusionsThis study reveals an inefficiency of autistic children in information sampling and tracks down this inefficiency to their increased sampling variability, primarily due to their cognitive preference for more local and static information.
These findings are consistent with several influential behavioral theories of ASD and highlight the needs of a multi-level understanding of cognitive flexibility in ASD.

Related Results

Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions
Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions
A large sample of autistic and non-autistic adults was recruited to investigate whether self-reported beliefs about their own and other people’s mindreading abilities were in line ...
Social camouflaging and mental health in adolescence: differences by sex and diagnosis
Social camouflaging and mental health in adolescence: differences by sex and diagnosis
Camouflaging is a term used to describe the set of strategies that autistic individuals use to hide or mask autistic traits. Importantly, nonautistic individuals can also camouflag...
An ethical advantage of autistic employees in the workplace
An ethical advantage of autistic employees in the workplace
Differences between autistic and nonautistic people are often framed as deficits. This research considers whether some of these differences might actually be strengths. In particul...
Autism and Literature
Autism and Literature
When autism was first conceptualized as a medical condition in the 1940s, an influential presumption was that to be autistic was to be profoundly limited in verbal language. Althou...
Sibling-Mediated Early Start Denver Model Support for Young Autistic Children
Sibling-Mediated Early Start Denver Model Support for Young Autistic Children
AbstractYoung autistic children and their siblings often need support to play and engage with each other. The inclusion of older siblings in the provision of support may improve ou...
Sleep problems in autism: Sex differences in the school‐age population
Sleep problems in autism: Sex differences in the school‐age population
AbstractClinically significant sleep problems affect up to 86% of the autistic population in school‐age. Sleep problems can have negative impacts on child cognition, behavior, and ...
Autistic adults perceive and experience laughter differently to non-autistic adults
Autistic adults perceive and experience laughter differently to non-autistic adults
AbstractHuman interaction is immersed in laughter; though genuine and posed laughter are acoustically distinct, they are both crucial socio-emotional signals. In this novel study, ...
Relationship between Socioeconomic Risk Factors, Psychological Inflexibility, and Depression among Individuals Living in Rural Areas
Relationship between Socioeconomic Risk Factors, Psychological Inflexibility, and Depression among Individuals Living in Rural Areas
Introduction: A high prevalence of depression in rural areas has led to increases in suicidality. Our study aim is to investigate the role of psychological inflexibility as a media...

Back to Top