Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative profitability of agroecological practices in Ethiopian wheat farming
View through CrossRef
IntroductionAgroecology is increasingly promoted as a pathway to sustainable food production, aiming to maximize natural resource use while minimizing external inputs with harmful environmental effects. Agroecological practices can enhance farm productivity while ensuring environmental sustainability. However, these practices often require higher initial investments compared to business-as-usual (BAU) practices, and their profitability and relative risks are not well studied. This research evaluates the profitability and risk of adopting agroecological practices among wheat farmers in Ethiopia.MethodsWe conducted a deterministic cost-benefit analysis (CBA) incorporating sensitivity and scenario analysis to evaluate the profitability and relative risks associated with three agroecological practices: certified wheat seed, optimal site-specific inorganic fertilizer application rates, and drainage of waterlogged soils. The analysis considered yield uncertainty, market price fluctuations, and implementation variability to provide robust insights for decision-making.ResultsThe deterministic CBA revealed that among the three practices, the use of certified seeds was the most profitable, with a net present value (NPV) of US$ 2,531 ha–1. This was followed by optimal site-specific inorganic fertilizer application, with an NPV of US$ 2,371 ha–1. Drainage of waterlogged soils yielded the lowest profitability, with an NPV of US$ 2,099 ha–1.DiscussionThe results indicate that certified seeds and optimal fertilizer rates offer higher financial returns, making them attractive investments for wheat farmers. However, profitability alone does not guarantee adoption. Other factors, including social and behavioral aspects, influence farmer decisions. Future research should integrate these dimensions to develop comprehensive strategies for promoting agroecological practices.ConclusionAdopting agroecological practices has clear economic benefits for Ethiopian wheat farmers, with certified seeds emerging as the most profitable option. These findings provide evidence for stakeholders to design targeted interventions that maximize returns while addressing barriers to adoption.
Title: Comparative profitability of agroecological practices in Ethiopian wheat farming
Description:
IntroductionAgroecology is increasingly promoted as a pathway to sustainable food production, aiming to maximize natural resource use while minimizing external inputs with harmful environmental effects.
Agroecological practices can enhance farm productivity while ensuring environmental sustainability.
However, these practices often require higher initial investments compared to business-as-usual (BAU) practices, and their profitability and relative risks are not well studied.
This research evaluates the profitability and risk of adopting agroecological practices among wheat farmers in Ethiopia.
MethodsWe conducted a deterministic cost-benefit analysis (CBA) incorporating sensitivity and scenario analysis to evaluate the profitability and relative risks associated with three agroecological practices: certified wheat seed, optimal site-specific inorganic fertilizer application rates, and drainage of waterlogged soils.
The analysis considered yield uncertainty, market price fluctuations, and implementation variability to provide robust insights for decision-making.
ResultsThe deterministic CBA revealed that among the three practices, the use of certified seeds was the most profitable, with a net present value (NPV) of US$ 2,531 ha–1.
This was followed by optimal site-specific inorganic fertilizer application, with an NPV of US$ 2,371 ha–1.
Drainage of waterlogged soils yielded the lowest profitability, with an NPV of US$ 2,099 ha–1.
DiscussionThe results indicate that certified seeds and optimal fertilizer rates offer higher financial returns, making them attractive investments for wheat farmers.
However, profitability alone does not guarantee adoption.
Other factors, including social and behavioral aspects, influence farmer decisions.
Future research should integrate these dimensions to develop comprehensive strategies for promoting agroecological practices.
ConclusionAdopting agroecological practices has clear economic benefits for Ethiopian wheat farmers, with certified seeds emerging as the most profitable option.
These findings provide evidence for stakeholders to design targeted interventions that maximize returns while addressing barriers to adoption.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Environmental Effects and Their impact on Yield in Adjacent Experimental Plots of High and Short Stem Wheat Varieties
Environmental Effects and Their impact on Yield in Adjacent Experimental Plots of High and Short Stem Wheat Varieties
Abstract
Using Xinhuamai818 as the experimental material for high stem wheat varieties, HHH as the control plot for high stem wheat varieties(One letter represents an exper...
Environmental Effects and Their Impact on Yield in Adjacent Experimental Plots of High-stem and Short-Stem Wheat Varieties
Environmental Effects and Their Impact on Yield in Adjacent Experimental Plots of High-stem and Short-Stem Wheat Varieties
Abstract
Xinhuamai 818 was used as the experimental material for high-stem wheat varieties, HHH was used as the control plot for high-stem wheat varieties (one letter repre...
Factors influencing the implementation of agroecological practices: Lessons drawn from the Aba-Garima watershed, Ethiopia
Factors influencing the implementation of agroecological practices: Lessons drawn from the Aba-Garima watershed, Ethiopia
The challenges to agroecological transitions are not the same for all farmers and implementation of agroecological practices in different locations could yield different results. W...
FEM-Vida: an innovative vision on the socio-economic viability of small agroecological farms
FEM-Vida: an innovative vision on the socio-economic viability of small agroecological farms
Conventional definitions of viability, which focus on monetary elements and productive work, are not enough to fully explain how agroecological farm's function and are able to repr...
Effect of sorghum flour substitution on pasting behavior of wheat flour and application of composite flour in bread
Effect of sorghum flour substitution on pasting behavior of wheat flour and application of composite flour in bread
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of sorghum flour substitution to wheat flour on pasting and thermal properties of the composite flours as well as firmness...
A partial equilibrium model of Afghanistan wheat market
A partial equilibrium model of Afghanistan wheat market
This study focuses on the construction of a structural economic model for the wheat market in Afghanistan. We create two models with alternative approaches to model closure, one ba...
Agroecological cropping systems: decoloniality and resistance
Agroecological cropping systems: decoloniality and resistance
The colonization of Latin America was a violent invasion that destroyed diverse cosmovisions and instituted monocultures not only in the fields, but in thoughts as well. The effect...

