Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Making No Compromise

View through CrossRef
This is the first book-length account of the lives and editorial careers of Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, the women who founded the avant-garde journal the Little Review in Chicago in 1914. Born in the nineteenth-century Midwest, Anderson and Heap grew up to be iconoclastic rebels, living openly as lesbians, and advocating causes from anarchy to feminism and free love. Their lives and work shattered cultural, social, and sexual norms. As their paths crisscrossed Chicago, New York, Paris, and Europe; two World wars; and a parade of the most celebrated artists of their time, they transformed themselves and their journal into major forces for shifting perspectives on literature and art. Imagism, Dada, surrealism, and Machine Age aesthetics were among the radical trends the Little Review promoted and introduced to US audiences. Anderson and Heap published the early work of the “men of 1914”—Ezra Pound, James Joyce, William Butler Yeats, and T. S. Eliot—and promoted women writers such as Djuna Barnes, May Sinclair, Dorothy Richardson, Mina Loy, Mary Butts, and the inimitable Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. In the mid-1920s, Anderson and Heap became adherents of George I. Gurdjieff, a Russian mystic, and in 1929 ceased publication of the Little Review. This book examines the roles of radical politics, sexuality, modernism, and spirituality and suggests that Anderson and Heap's interest in esoteric questions was evident from the early days of the Little Review. The book tells the story of two women who played an important role in shaping modernism.
Cornell University Press
Title: Making No Compromise
Description:
This is the first book-length account of the lives and editorial careers of Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, the women who founded the avant-garde journal the Little Review in Chicago in 1914.
Born in the nineteenth-century Midwest, Anderson and Heap grew up to be iconoclastic rebels, living openly as lesbians, and advocating causes from anarchy to feminism and free love.
Their lives and work shattered cultural, social, and sexual norms.
As their paths crisscrossed Chicago, New York, Paris, and Europe; two World wars; and a parade of the most celebrated artists of their time, they transformed themselves and their journal into major forces for shifting perspectives on literature and art.
Imagism, Dada, surrealism, and Machine Age aesthetics were among the radical trends the Little Review promoted and introduced to US audiences.
Anderson and Heap published the early work of the “men of 1914”—Ezra Pound, James Joyce, William Butler Yeats, and T.
S.
Eliot—and promoted women writers such as Djuna Barnes, May Sinclair, Dorothy Richardson, Mina Loy, Mary Butts, and the inimitable Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven.
In the mid-1920s, Anderson and Heap became adherents of George I.
Gurdjieff, a Russian mystic, and in 1929 ceased publication of the Little Review.
This book examines the roles of radical politics, sexuality, modernism, and spirituality and suggests that Anderson and Heap's interest in esoteric questions was evident from the early days of the Little Review.
The book tells the story of two women who played an important role in shaping modernism.

Related Results

Compromise and Consensus: Toward a Two-Track Model of Deliberation
Compromise and Consensus: Toward a Two-Track Model of Deliberation
In this article, we discuss the relationship between deliberative democracy, compromise, and consensus. According to one view, deliberation should aim exclusively at compromise (co...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
The co-existence of the compromise and reversed compromise effects
The co-existence of the compromise and reversed compromise effects
Abstract Three studies (n = 964, CloudResearch) are presented that clarify the conditions that determine the direction of the compromise effect in decisions under risk. Stu...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Compromise in Political Theory
Compromise in Political Theory
This review article provides a topic-centered overview of the state of compromise in political theory, where compromise is increasingly discussed as a promising approach to dealing...
Don't Budge! The Reputational Cost of Political Compromises
Don't Budge! The Reputational Cost of Political Compromises
How do citizens evaluate political parties’ willingness to compromise during coalition negotiations in representative democracies? While previous research has shown that citizens s...
Democracy, Compromise and the Representation Paradox: Coalition Government and Political Integrity
Democracy, Compromise and the Representation Paradox: Coalition Government and Political Integrity
AbstractCoalitions are often condemned as undemocratic and unprincipled because of the compromises they involve. Politicians are accused of betraying the commitments they made duri...
Unpacking Executive Conflict Resolution: Insights from an Indian Diversified Industrial Cluster
Unpacking Executive Conflict Resolution: Insights from an Indian Diversified Industrial Cluster
Todays integrated work environment is highly dynamic in nature and “Conflict” is an inevitable part of organizational life. The ways in which conflicts are resolved in the organisa...

Back to Top