Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS

View through CrossRef
The labelling of food products that contain new technologies have been carried out to ensure that consumers are well informed on the hazards and uncertainty of the technologies incorporated for food production. Although food labelling is important, the implementation of mandatory labelling measures for nanofood within the domestic legislation is only possible if it is aligned with the regulations of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). This study examines the mandatory labelling measure for nanofood that would be permissible under the WTO agreements, i.e. under the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement. This study adopted a doctrinal approach and content analysis that examine the relevant legal provisions in the WTO agreements, proceedings conducted by the WTO, and other documents on nanofood labelling. The findings suggest that the labelling measure amounts to unnecessary barriers to international trade. Moreover, mandatory labelling is not an international labelling standard, while the practice of mandatory labelling was found to be trade restrictive. Some recommendations were presented in this study that provide valuable insights on the implementation of mandatory labelling for nanofood if countries decide to introduce this measures into their food information system.
Title: MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS
Description:
The labelling of food products that contain new technologies have been carried out to ensure that consumers are well informed on the hazards and uncertainty of the technologies incorporated for food production.
Although food labelling is important, the implementation of mandatory labelling measures for nanofood within the domestic legislation is only possible if it is aligned with the regulations of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
This study examines the mandatory labelling measure for nanofood that would be permissible under the WTO agreements, i.
e.
under the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement.
This study adopted a doctrinal approach and content analysis that examine the relevant legal provisions in the WTO agreements, proceedings conducted by the WTO, and other documents on nanofood labelling.
The findings suggest that the labelling measure amounts to unnecessary barriers to international trade.
Moreover, mandatory labelling is not an international labelling standard, while the practice of mandatory labelling was found to be trade restrictive.
Some recommendations were presented in this study that provide valuable insights on the implementation of mandatory labelling for nanofood if countries decide to introduce this measures into their food information system.

Related Results

WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
Background. The most of the world’s trade relations are governed by uniform rules that form the legal basis of the WTO. Member states sometimes have different understanding of the ...
Aktuelle Probleme der WTO
Aktuelle Probleme der WTO
Nach Ende des Zweiten Weltkrieges unterzeichnen knapp zwei Dutzend Staaten das von den USA vorgeschlagene «Allgemeine Zoll- und Handelsabkommen» (GATT). Die damalige Neuordnung des...
Using res judicata to resolve jurisdictional conflicts between WTO and regional trade agreements’ dispute settlement mechanisms
Using res judicata to resolve jurisdictional conflicts between WTO and regional trade agreements’ dispute settlement mechanisms
The WTO has a renowned dispute settlement body, distinguished from other dispute settlement bodies by its compulsory and exclusive jurisdiction. However, regional trade agreements ...
Gender - specific differences in perception of menu labelling, witnessed among Hospitality Management students
Gender - specific differences in perception of menu labelling, witnessed among Hospitality Management students
Since nutrition labelling is obligatory for all packed food circulating across the European Union (EU), out-eating people demand, ever more often, to be provided with proper nutrit...
A Trade War of Attrition: Attempted Unilateral De-Legalization and the Struggle over the WTO Regime
A Trade War of Attrition: Attempted Unilateral De-Legalization and the Struggle over the WTO Regime
The actions of the United States (US) government towards the World Trade Organization (WTO) offer a window into a rarely seen event: a unilateral attempt by a hegemonic power to de...
PRIVATE ACTOR RIGHTS DERIVED FROM THE WTO TFA
PRIVATE ACTOR RIGHTS DERIVED FROM THE WTO TFA
The lack of a legal protection for private actors at the domestic level surely brings disadvantages for them as they are not likely to have any legal foundation to enforce their ri...
Sustaining Multilateralism from the Bench
Sustaining Multilateralism from the Bench
The ever-increasing surge in regional trade agreements (RTAs) over the past two decades has generated growing friction between regionalism and multilateralism in international econ...
China and World Trade Organization Law
China and World Trade Organization Law
China had a complex engagement with the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) which reflected both its drastic political changes thro...

Back to Top