Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Social media and vaccine hesitancy
View through CrossRef
Background
Understanding the threat posed by anti-vaccination efforts on social media is critically important with the forth coming need for world wide COVID-19 vaccination programs. We globally evaluate the effect of social media and online foreign disinformation campaigns on vaccination rates and attitudes towards vaccine safety.
Methods
We use a large-n cross-country regression framework to evaluate the effect of social media on vaccine hesitancy globally. To do so, we operationalize social media usage in two dimensions: the use of it by the public to organize action (using Digital Society Project indicators), and the level of negatively oriented discourse about vaccines on social media (using a data set of all geocoded tweets in the world from 2018-2019). In addition, we measure the level of foreign-sourced coordinated disinformation operations on social media ineach country (using Digital Society Project indicators). The outcome of vaccine hesitancy is measured in two ways. First, we use polls of what proportion of the public per country feels vaccines are unsafe (using Wellcome Global Monitor indicators for 137 countries). Second, we use annual data of actual vaccination rates from the WHO for 166 countries.
Results
We found the use of social media to organise offline action to be highly predictive of the belief that vaccinations are unsafe, with such beliefs mounting as more organisation occurs on social media. In addition, the prevalence of foreign disinformation is highly statistically and substantively significant in predicting a drop in mean vaccination coverage over time. A 1-point shift upwards in the 5-point disinformation scale is associated with a 2-percentage point drop in mean vaccination coverage year over year. We also found support for the connection of foreign disinformation with negative social media activity about vaccination. The substantive effect of foreign disinformation is to increase the number of negative vaccine tweets by 15% for the median country.
Conclusion
There is a significant relationship between organisation on social media and public doubts of vaccine safety. In addition, there is a substantial relationship between foreign disinformation campaigns and declining vaccination coverage.
Title: Social media and vaccine hesitancy
Description:
Background
Understanding the threat posed by anti-vaccination efforts on social media is critically important with the forth coming need for world wide COVID-19 vaccination programs.
We globally evaluate the effect of social media and online foreign disinformation campaigns on vaccination rates and attitudes towards vaccine safety.
Methods
We use a large-n cross-country regression framework to evaluate the effect of social media on vaccine hesitancy globally.
To do so, we operationalize social media usage in two dimensions: the use of it by the public to organize action (using Digital Society Project indicators), and the level of negatively oriented discourse about vaccines on social media (using a data set of all geocoded tweets in the world from 2018-2019).
In addition, we measure the level of foreign-sourced coordinated disinformation operations on social media ineach country (using Digital Society Project indicators).
The outcome of vaccine hesitancy is measured in two ways.
First, we use polls of what proportion of the public per country feels vaccines are unsafe (using Wellcome Global Monitor indicators for 137 countries).
Second, we use annual data of actual vaccination rates from the WHO for 166 countries.
Results
We found the use of social media to organise offline action to be highly predictive of the belief that vaccinations are unsafe, with such beliefs mounting as more organisation occurs on social media.
In addition, the prevalence of foreign disinformation is highly statistically and substantively significant in predicting a drop in mean vaccination coverage over time.
A 1-point shift upwards in the 5-point disinformation scale is associated with a 2-percentage point drop in mean vaccination coverage year over year.
We also found support for the connection of foreign disinformation with negative social media activity about vaccination.
The substantive effect of foreign disinformation is to increase the number of negative vaccine tweets by 15% for the median country.
Conclusion
There is a significant relationship between organisation on social media and public doubts of vaccine safety.
In addition, there is a substantial relationship between foreign disinformation campaigns and declining vaccination coverage.
Related Results
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Anxiety and fear of COVID-19 as potential mechanisms to explain vaccine hesitancy among adults
Anxiety and fear of COVID-19 as potential mechanisms to explain vaccine hesitancy among adults
BackgroundVaccine hesitancy is a significant global problem resulting from the interaction of multiple factors, including mental health factors. However, the association of COVID-1...
Abstract 6186: HPV vaccine hesitancy and uptake: A conceptual analysis using Rodgers' evolutionary approach
Abstract 6186: HPV vaccine hesitancy and uptake: A conceptual analysis using Rodgers' evolutionary approach
Abstract
Aim:
This study examines the factors contributing to HPV vaccine hesitancy through Rodgers's evolutionary concept analy...
Towards a More Critical Public Health Understanding of Vaccine Hesitancy: Key Insights from a Decade of Research
Towards a More Critical Public Health Understanding of Vaccine Hesitancy: Key Insights from a Decade of Research
Vaccine hesitancy has gained renewed attention as an important public health concern worldwide. Against this backdrop, over the last decade, we have conducted various qualitative, ...
Comparison of COVID and influenza vaccine hesitancy among clients of the San Antonio Food Bank
Comparison of COVID and influenza vaccine hesitancy among clients of the San Antonio Food Bank
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has continued despite large-scale public health measures. Some people are still hesitant to receive the COVID vaccine. The San Antonio Food Bank (...
Using the Social–Ecological Model to Assess Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal in a Highly Religious Lower–Middle-Income Country
Using the Social–Ecological Model to Assess Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal in a Highly Religious Lower–Middle-Income Country
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to understand the factors associated with vaccine hesitancy and refusal in Indonesia using the Social–Ecological Model (SEM). (2) Methods:...
COVID‐19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Self‐Reported Adverse Events, and Determinants Among Ethiopian Healthcare Professionals During COVID‐19 Pandemic
COVID‐19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Self‐Reported Adverse Events, and Determinants Among Ethiopian Healthcare Professionals During COVID‐19 Pandemic
ABSTRACTThis nationwide cross‐sectional online survey aimed to assess coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccine hesitancy, self‐reported adverse events (SRAEs), and associated de...
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Hawassa City Administration, Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A community-based study
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Hawassa City Administration, Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A community-based study
ObjectiveThe COVID-19 vaccine is one of the key measures to control the disease. However, some people are hesitant to take the vaccine. The objective of this study was to assess CO...

