Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Judicial Process and Proof
View through CrossRef
Chapter 4 deals with key aspects of the judicial process in ancient Mesopotamia. Beyond the use of various forms of evidence in trials, ordeals are attested. These ordeals were intended to determine cases in reliance upon the gods, which also provided an element of religious coercion. In particular, the River Ordeal and the Oath Ordeal are discussed in relation to the prison goddess. The literary vision of the judicial process is situated in the context of the actual judicial process as attested in the documents of practice. The literary vision and awe of the judicial ordeal are also attested in other literary texts, which receive consideration in this chapter, as well. The awe-inspiring context of approaching the king and partaking in ordeals before the gods were intended to reveal the truth, induce honesty, and determine guilt. By considering the judicial process in connection with imprisonment, it is demonstrated that imprisonment in relation to “crime” largely functioned as a place of holding until trial and until punishment but not as punishment.
Title: Judicial Process and Proof
Description:
Chapter 4 deals with key aspects of the judicial process in ancient Mesopotamia.
Beyond the use of various forms of evidence in trials, ordeals are attested.
These ordeals were intended to determine cases in reliance upon the gods, which also provided an element of religious coercion.
In particular, the River Ordeal and the Oath Ordeal are discussed in relation to the prison goddess.
The literary vision of the judicial process is situated in the context of the actual judicial process as attested in the documents of practice.
The literary vision and awe of the judicial ordeal are also attested in other literary texts, which receive consideration in this chapter, as well.
The awe-inspiring context of approaching the king and partaking in ordeals before the gods were intended to reveal the truth, induce honesty, and determine guilt.
By considering the judicial process in connection with imprisonment, it is demonstrated that imprisonment in relation to “crime” largely functioned as a place of holding until trial and until punishment but not as punishment.
Related Results
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
On free proof and regulated proof
On free proof and regulated proof
Free proof and regulated proof are two basic modes of judicial proof. The system of ‘legal proof’ established in France in the 16th century is a classical model of regulated proof....
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
Transport Layer Security 1.0 handshake protocol formal verification case study: How to use a proof script generator for existing large proof scores
Transport Layer Security 1.0 handshake protocol formal verification case study: How to use a proof script generator for existing large proof scores
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.0 protocol has been formally verified with CafeInMaude Proof Generator (CiMPG) and Proof Assistant (CiMPA), where CafeInMaude is the second maj...
Judicial Review in Nepal
Judicial Review in Nepal
Judicial Review of Laws and Administrative decisions in question is an integral exercise of democratic practice. As one of the organs of the government Judiciary should not only vi...
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Terkait Peninjauan Kembali
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Terkait Peninjauan Kembali
Judicial review serves as one of the major backbones of the judicial system in any democratic polity. It ensures the consolidation of democracy because it serves as the principal m...
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Based on the analysis of contemporary scholarly approaches to defining the functional purpose of first-instance courts in ensuring judicial protection of citizens’ rights during pr...
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
The article analyzes the provisions of procedural legislation on judicial conciliation and judicial conciliators. The authors review the provisions of several draft laws that conta...

