Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Jos: Prospects and perspectives

View through CrossRef
Abstract Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now done in a lot more private and public hospital settings presently in low-income countries, particularly sub-Saharan Africa. Though it is not routinely done in these centres, the percentage of cholecystectomies done laparoscopically has increased over the years. Laparoscopic surgery services were introduced at our hospital in 2011 and this retrospective study reviews our outcomes with the procedure over a 6-year period. A total of 87 cholecystectomies were done in the period under review. Forty-eight (55.2%) were laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 30 (44.8%) were open cholecystectomies, and 9 (10.3%) were mini-laparotomy cholecystectomies. There were 32 (66.7%) women and 16 (33.3%) men who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy giving a male-to-female ratio of 1:2. The mean age of the patients was 41.0 years (SD = 14.3 years). The most common indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was calculous cholecystitis. The most common co-morbidity was hypertension in 23 (47.9%) patients, followed by sickle cell anaemia in 10 (20.8%) patients. The operating time ranged from 70 min to 120 min with a mean of 86.6 (SD = 14.5). There were three conversions and two intra-operative complications. Twenty-five patients (52.1%) were discharged within 24 h, 16 (33.3%) within 48 h and the rest (14.6%) were discharged later. The duration of surgery had a significant association with duration of hospital stay. There was 1 mortality in our study. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers unique advantages over open such as decreased length of hospital stay and reduced wound complications. Most of the cholecystectomies in our setting are now performed laparoscopically with a low conversion rate and low incidence of bile duct injuries. Patients with sickle cell disease constitute a significant percentage of patients requiring this procedure.
Title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Jos: Prospects and perspectives
Description:
Abstract Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now done in a lot more private and public hospital settings presently in low-income countries, particularly sub-Saharan Africa.
Though it is not routinely done in these centres, the percentage of cholecystectomies done laparoscopically has increased over the years.
Laparoscopic surgery services were introduced at our hospital in 2011 and this retrospective study reviews our outcomes with the procedure over a 6-year period.
A total of 87 cholecystectomies were done in the period under review.
Forty-eight (55.
2%) were laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 30 (44.
8%) were open cholecystectomies, and 9 (10.
3%) were mini-laparotomy cholecystectomies.
There were 32 (66.
7%) women and 16 (33.
3%) men who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy giving a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.
The mean age of the patients was 41.
0 years (SD = 14.
3 years).
The most common indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was calculous cholecystitis.
The most common co-morbidity was hypertension in 23 (47.
9%) patients, followed by sickle cell anaemia in 10 (20.
8%) patients.
The operating time ranged from 70 min to 120 min with a mean of 86.
6 (SD = 14.
5).
There were three conversions and two intra-operative complications.
Twenty-five patients (52.
1%) were discharged within 24 h, 16 (33.
3%) within 48 h and the rest (14.
6%) were discharged later.
The duration of surgery had a significant association with duration of hospital stay.
There was 1 mortality in our study.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers unique advantages over open such as decreased length of hospital stay and reduced wound complications.
Most of the cholecystectomies in our setting are now performed laparoscopically with a low conversion rate and low incidence of bile duct injuries.
Patients with sickle cell disease constitute a significant percentage of patients requiring this procedure.

Related Results

The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
Abstract Background/purpose Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopi...
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Background and Aim:Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) continue to be a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The prevalence of iatrogenic IBDI increased with the laparosc...
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Background:  The purpose of the present study was to examine the current approach and different strategies adopted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany.Methods:  A retrospec...
Proinflammatory cytokines in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Proinflammatory cytokines in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a minimal access surgery, is fast replacing open cholecystectomy and is being associated with less trauma. The objective of this study was ...
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Background: Acute cholecystitis, which is typically associated with gallstones, is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen presenting in emergency departments around the wor...
Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study
Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study
Objective: To compare the complications among patients undergoing three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Comparative ...

Back to Top