Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Examining the Design and Development of a Social Justice Makerspace
View through CrossRef
In our society, where technologies continue to act as a marginalizing force for various individuals and communities, makerspaces present unique opportunities for community-driven work that engages people with a variety of communal technologies, knowledge, and work practices. However, makerspaces grew out of largely exclusionary discourses, which continue to neglect non-dominant technology practices, knowledge bases, and communities. Despite these origins, research remains largely optimistic about the potential for makerspaces to provide equitable opportunities for those stereotypically excluded to engage, learn, and build with technologies. We mirror this optimism through our work examining how makerspaces might be positioned to address social inequities while supporting community growth and development. This paper traces the development of a social justice makerspace situated within a community of color in the United States. The work contributes a contextual analysis of the design of a makerspace explicitly positioned to forefront community voices and address issues of social inequities. We highlight community perspectives within our situated design process as we draw out the themes and tensions that arose. Applying a social justice framework from Dombrowski et al. (2016) and Lötter's (2011) to our findings we demonstrate how makerspaces can be positioned to address social inequities through: identifying, educating, and communicating about inequities; engaging in the distribution of resources and opportunities; and enabling capacity building at the individual and structural levels. We highlight how an asset-based orientation can position the makerspace to grow in effective ways to address community issues.
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Title: Examining the Design and Development of a Social Justice Makerspace
Description:
In our society, where technologies continue to act as a marginalizing force for various individuals and communities, makerspaces present unique opportunities for community-driven work that engages people with a variety of communal technologies, knowledge, and work practices.
However, makerspaces grew out of largely exclusionary discourses, which continue to neglect non-dominant technology practices, knowledge bases, and communities.
Despite these origins, research remains largely optimistic about the potential for makerspaces to provide equitable opportunities for those stereotypically excluded to engage, learn, and build with technologies.
We mirror this optimism through our work examining how makerspaces might be positioned to address social inequities while supporting community growth and development.
This paper traces the development of a social justice makerspace situated within a community of color in the United States.
The work contributes a contextual analysis of the design of a makerspace explicitly positioned to forefront community voices and address issues of social inequities.
We highlight community perspectives within our situated design process as we draw out the themes and tensions that arose.
Applying a social justice framework from Dombrowski et al.
(2016) and Lötter's (2011) to our findings we demonstrate how makerspaces can be positioned to address social inequities through: identifying, educating, and communicating about inequities; engaging in the distribution of resources and opportunities; and enabling capacity building at the individual and structural levels.
We highlight how an asset-based orientation can position the makerspace to grow in effective ways to address community issues.
Related Results
Implementasi Makerspace dalam Layanan Perpustakaan
Implementasi Makerspace dalam Layanan Perpustakaan
Perpustakaan saat ini masuk di era disrupsi, dimana banyak tugas perpustakaan sudah bisa dikerjakan oleh mesin atau teknologi. Pengguna potensial dan perilaku pengguna perpustakaan...
Making health innovation more inclusive in Ethiopia
Making health innovation more inclusive in Ethiopia
The COVID-19 global pandemic brought much Research and Innovation (R&I) to an abrupt halt. It also generated an urgent need for specific R&I to address particular challenge...
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAFTAR PUSTAKAAditama, M. H. R., & Selfiardy, S. (2022). Kehidupan Mahasiswa Kuliah Sambil Bekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kidspedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(...
Using Makerspaces to enrich Design and Technology education
Using Makerspaces to enrich Design and Technology education
The studies of Vourikari et al. (2019) and Walan & Gericke (2022), show that a significant amount of research on makerspaces focuses on how these community spaces provide an in...
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Experiences, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy Enhancement for Social Justice-Oriented Faculty
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Experiences, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy Enhancement for Social Justice-Oriented Faculty
Although a commitment to social justice is central to the identity of counseling psychologists, little is known about how faculty contribute to a culture of social justice. The cur...
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Consider, for instance, you and your family have lived around a place where you enjoyed the flora and fauna of the land as well as the natural environment. Fishing and farming were...

