Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Do Traditional Imaging Predictors Still Matter? A Systematic Review on Laser Efficiency and Stone-Free Outcomes in the Era of Advanced Lithotripsy
View through CrossRef
Endoscopic laser lithotripsy has become the standard treatment for urinary stones, yet preoperative imaging parameters that predict laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes remain incompletely characterized. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on current imaging-based predictors of laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes in endoscopic laser lithotripsy, with the goal of informing precision surgical planning and future predictive modeling. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We screened studies evaluating adult patients (≥18 years) with urinary stones undergoing endoscopic laser lithotripsy with preoperative imaging assessment and reported relationships between imaging parameters and treatment outcomes. Data extraction included patient characteristics, imaging parameters, laser technology, efficiency metrics, stone-free outcomes, and statistical relationships. One hundred ten studies comprising 23,847 patients met inclusion criteria. Stone density >1000 HU predicted significantly lower single-session stone-free rates (40% vs 95%, p=0.01) and longer operative time (75±15 vs 55±13 minutes, p<0.01) for stones >2 cm. Stone size >20 mm reduced stone-free rates to 68% versus 100% for stones ≤20 mm, with first-procedure success of only 25.0% for bilateral total diameter >30 mm. Lower pole location independently predicted reduced stone-free rates (OR 0.523, p<0.001), while stone relocation improved 3-month stone-free rates from 84.4% to 97.8% (p=0.026). Higher BMI unexpectedly predicted improved stone-free rates (OR 1.17, p=0.022). Thulium fiber laser demonstrated shorter lasing time (7.4±1.8 vs 14.8±1.5 minutes, p=0.011) and comparable stone-free rates to Ho: YAG. The SMASH score (HU × size/100) with cut-off of 15 distinguished RIRS success rates (82% vs 61%, p=0.03). Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) achieved 94.7-97.5% stone-free rates. Stone imaging characteristics helped predict complex surgical procedures and outcomes of endoscopic lithotripsy․ Imaging methods differed in their ability to predict procedural difficulty‚ with density being most predictive for large stones․ The anatomical location and stone burden helped predict procedural feasibility and stone clearance․ Support is provided for transitioning from descriptive imaging to predictive imaging-based surgical planning and the potential for imaging biomarkers and technology-dependent parameters to individualize surgery and optimize laser parameters․Stone density >1000 HU, size >20 mm, and lower pole location are validated predictors of reduced laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes. Composite scores such as Stone Management According to Size-Hardness (SMASH) score‚ show that radiological factors can be integrated into clinical decision-making for kidney stone management․ These results will allow for the next steps towards the use of artificial intelligence–driven predictive models for personalized endoscopic stone surgery and urinary stone treatment planning․
Yayasan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (Dinasti)
Title: Do Traditional Imaging Predictors Still Matter? A Systematic Review on Laser Efficiency and Stone-Free Outcomes in the Era of Advanced Lithotripsy
Description:
Endoscopic laser lithotripsy has become the standard treatment for urinary stones, yet preoperative imaging parameters that predict laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes remain incompletely characterized.
This systematic review synthesizes evidence on current imaging-based predictors of laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes in endoscopic laser lithotripsy, with the goal of informing precision surgical planning and future predictive modeling.
A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines.
We screened studies evaluating adult patients (≥18 years) with urinary stones undergoing endoscopic laser lithotripsy with preoperative imaging assessment and reported relationships between imaging parameters and treatment outcomes.
Data extraction included patient characteristics, imaging parameters, laser technology, efficiency metrics, stone-free outcomes, and statistical relationships.
One hundred ten studies comprising 23,847 patients met inclusion criteria.
Stone density >1000 HU predicted significantly lower single-session stone-free rates (40% vs 95%, p=0.
01) and longer operative time (75±15 vs 55±13 minutes, p<0.
01) for stones >2 cm.
Stone size >20 mm reduced stone-free rates to 68% versus 100% for stones ≤20 mm, with first-procedure success of only 25.
0% for bilateral total diameter >30 mm.
Lower pole location independently predicted reduced stone-free rates (OR 0.
523, p<0.
001), while stone relocation improved 3-month stone-free rates from 84.
4% to 97.
8% (p=0.
026).
Higher BMI unexpectedly predicted improved stone-free rates (OR 1.
17, p=0.
022).
Thulium fiber laser demonstrated shorter lasing time (7.
4±1.
8 vs 14.
8±1.
5 minutes, p=0.
011) and comparable stone-free rates to Ho: YAG.
The SMASH score (HU × size/100) with cut-off of 15 distinguished RIRS success rates (82% vs 61%, p=0.
03).
Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) achieved 94.
7-97.
5% stone-free rates.
Stone imaging characteristics helped predict complex surgical procedures and outcomes of endoscopic lithotripsy․ Imaging methods differed in their ability to predict procedural difficulty‚ with density being most predictive for large stones․ The anatomical location and stone burden helped predict procedural feasibility and stone clearance․ Support is provided for transitioning from descriptive imaging to predictive imaging-based surgical planning and the potential for imaging biomarkers and technology-dependent parameters to individualize surgery and optimize laser parameters․Stone density >1000 HU, size >20 mm, and lower pole location are validated predictors of reduced laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes.
Composite scores such as Stone Management According to Size-Hardness (SMASH) score‚ show that radiological factors can be integrated into clinical decision-making for kidney stone management․ These results will allow for the next steps towards the use of artificial intelligence–driven predictive models for personalized endoscopic stone surgery and urinary stone treatment planning․.
Related Results
LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
Ureteric stones represent a significant proportion of urolithiasis cases and are a common cause of emergency department visits worldwide. Minimally invasive endourological techniqu...
URERTEROSCOPIC LASER LITHOTRIPSY IS BETTER THAN PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETRIC STONES
URERTEROSCOPIC LASER LITHOTRIPSY IS BETTER THAN PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETRIC STONES
Background: Among various intra-corporeal lithotripters, pneumatic lithotripter has become the widely used tool for the treatment of urinary stones. Recently the holmium: YAG laser...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Abstract
Introduction
Over the past 15 years, ureteral stone treatment has evolved significantly. Management now depends on stone size, location, composition, patient circu...
The Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Use of Wire Stone Basket and Pneumatic Lithotripter Probe in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Randomized Control Trial
The Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Use of Wire Stone Basket and Pneumatic Lithotripter Probe in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Randomized Control Trial
Introduction: A routine treatment of ureteral stones is using ureteroscopic lithotripsy, a common problem of which is retropulsion of the stone to the renal pelvis and calyces tha...
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
<i>Objectives:</i> This study was undertaken to compare the results of laser (Ho:YAG) and pneumatic (ballistic) intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in terms...
Laser Spectrometric Techniques in Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
Laser Spectrometric Techniques in Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
Abstract
Laser light has a number of spectacular properties that make it useful for analytical spectrometry. One is that it has a high directionality (i.e. i...

