Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Relevance of Ihdad Regulations as a Sign of Mourning and Human Rights Restriction
View through CrossRef
Ihdad is a form of mourning carried out by families. The sharia mandates ihdad for women who have lost their husbands. There is no fiqh regarding ihdad for husbands. It often gives rise to the perception that there is a tendency to discriminate against women. However, customary law has regulations for mourning periods for husbands. This article aims to determine the relevance of Islamic law in regulating the mourning period for women and men with the value of protecting human rights. The research was carried out normatively by comparing shariah, positive legal regulations in Indonesia, notably the customs of the Banjar community, and regulations in Malaysia. The theories underlying this research include customary law theory, al-maslahah, and human rights protection. The results of this research illustrate that Islamic fiqh does not regulate ihdad for husbands. In Indonesia, KHI regulates the mourning period (ihdad) not only for wives but also for husbands. Meanwhile, in Malaysia, there is no ihdad for husbands, and the rules are explicit in the Enactment of the Islamic Family Law. The customary law of the Banjar community regulates the mourning period for the husband by not remarrying and not interfering with inheritance matters during the mourning period for a period of one hundred days. Customary laws that do not conflict with sharia and meet the requirements for implementing 'urf can be implemented. Ihdad is and will continue to be relevant to protecting human rights by prioritizing the values of maslahah and respect. The rules in Indonesia and Malaysia are based on Islamic law, considering religious and humanist values in the form of leniency.
Title: The Relevance of Ihdad Regulations as a Sign of Mourning and Human Rights Restriction
Description:
Ihdad is a form of mourning carried out by families.
The sharia mandates ihdad for women who have lost their husbands.
There is no fiqh regarding ihdad for husbands.
It often gives rise to the perception that there is a tendency to discriminate against women.
However, customary law has regulations for mourning periods for husbands.
This article aims to determine the relevance of Islamic law in regulating the mourning period for women and men with the value of protecting human rights.
The research was carried out normatively by comparing shariah, positive legal regulations in Indonesia, notably the customs of the Banjar community, and regulations in Malaysia.
The theories underlying this research include customary law theory, al-maslahah, and human rights protection.
The results of this research illustrate that Islamic fiqh does not regulate ihdad for husbands.
In Indonesia, KHI regulates the mourning period (ihdad) not only for wives but also for husbands.
Meanwhile, in Malaysia, there is no ihdad for husbands, and the rules are explicit in the Enactment of the Islamic Family Law.
The customary law of the Banjar community regulates the mourning period for the husband by not remarrying and not interfering with inheritance matters during the mourning period for a period of one hundred days.
Customary laws that do not conflict with sharia and meet the requirements for implementing 'urf can be implemented.
Ihdad is and will continue to be relevant to protecting human rights by prioritizing the values of maslahah and respect.
The rules in Indonesia and Malaysia are based on Islamic law, considering religious and humanist values in the form of leniency.
Related Results
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
TINJAUAN MAQASHID AL-SYARI’AH TERHADAP IHDAD PEREMPUAN PEKERJA PABRIK DI PT. SELALU CINTA INDONESIA (SCI)
TINJAUAN MAQASHID AL-SYARI’AH TERHADAP IHDAD PEREMPUAN PEKERJA PABRIK DI PT. SELALU CINTA INDONESIA (SCI)
ABSTRACT
Iddah is a waiting period experienced by women after divorce or the death of their husbands. During the iddah period, women are obligated to undergo ihdad. However, there...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Mourning and African American Ritual
Mourning and African American Ritual
African American mourning and ritual are cultural by-products of enduring racism in a nation premised on equality of opportunity. Coming to terms with social losses wrought by prol...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...
Persoalan Iddah dan Ihdad Bagi Wanita Karir
Persoalan Iddah dan Ihdad Bagi Wanita Karir
The discussion in this study tries to reveal everything related to women's freedom in doing activities outside the home, but she also has several religious regulations that follow ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

