Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Orthodoxy Imposed at Constantinople

View through CrossRef
Abstract Theodosius I became emperor on 19 January 379 at the height of the Gothic crisis after the disaster of Adrianople. It would be reasonable to assume that Gratian chose him in the first place because of his qualities as a soldier and politician, as the man most likely to lead the Eastern Empire out of its dangerous situation. But it is clear that from the beginning Theodosius considered that his task had an essential component: the restoration of unity in the Church. For already in August 379 an edict was issued jointly by Gratian and Theodosius forbidding all heresies ‘by divine and imperial law’, and annulling an edict of tolerance which Gratian had issued at Sirmium not long before. It is reasonable to suppose that this dramatic reversal of policy was made under the influence not only of Ambrose, the strong minded bishop of Milan,3 but also of Gratian’s new colleague. In spite of the obvious advantage of facing the crisis in unity based on tolerance, Gratian and ·. Theodosius decided, as Constantine had decided before them, that their responsibility to God for the unity of the Church must have priority.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Orthodoxy Imposed at Constantinople
Description:
Abstract Theodosius I became emperor on 19 January 379 at the height of the Gothic crisis after the disaster of Adrianople.
It would be reasonable to assume that Gratian chose him in the first place because of his qualities as a soldier and politician, as the man most likely to lead the Eastern Empire out of its dangerous situation.
But it is clear that from the beginning Theodosius considered that his task had an essential component: the restoration of unity in the Church.
For already in August 379 an edict was issued jointly by Gratian and Theodosius forbidding all heresies ‘by divine and imperial law’, and annulling an edict of tolerance which Gratian had issued at Sirmium not long before.
It is reasonable to suppose that this dramatic reversal of policy was made under the influence not only of Ambrose, the strong minded bishop of Milan,3 but also of Gratian’s new colleague.
In spite of the obvious advantage of facing the crisis in unity based on tolerance, Gratian and ·.
Theodosius decided, as Constantine had decided before them, that their responsibility to God for the unity of the Church must have priority.

Related Results

Physician and miracle worker. The cult of Saint Sampson the Xenodochos and his images in eastern Orthodox medieval painting
Physician and miracle worker. The cult of Saint Sampson the Xenodochos and his images in eastern Orthodox medieval painting
Saint Sampson, whose feast is celebrated on June 27, was depicted among holy physicians. However, his images were not frequent. He was usually accompanied with Saint Mokios (...
Russian Orthodoxy Nowadays
Russian Orthodoxy Nowadays
Russian Orthodoxy is one of the most mythologized and difficult for scientific research fragments of modern Russia’s social life. Thus, the statements still exist on the universal ...
African Ethiopia and Byzantine imperial orthodoxy: Politically influenced self-definition of Christianity
African Ethiopia and Byzantine imperial orthodoxy: Politically influenced self-definition of Christianity
The ancient Ethiopian Christian empire was an emergent and notable power in Eastern Africa and influenced its surrounding regions. It was itself influenced both religiously and pol...
Between Text and Discourse: Re-Theorizing Islamic Orthodoxy
Between Text and Discourse: Re-Theorizing Islamic Orthodoxy
This article will examine the concept of orthodoxy as it appears in the work of Talal Asad and two of his interlocutors, namely Ovamir Anjum and Shahab Ahmed. In response to Ahmed’...
Academic Freedom and Academic Orthodoxy
Academic Freedom and Academic Orthodoxy
<span>This piece was written for a collection of essays, edited by Lee C. Bollinger and Geoffrey R. Stone, titled “Academic Freedom in the Era of Trump” (forthcoming from Oxf...
Marcellinus and Constantinople
Marcellinus and Constantinople
Abstract Marcellinus came to Constantinople from his native Illyricum around the turn of the sixth century and spent the rest of his life in the capital and wrote hi...
Constantinople III and Constantinople IV: Minorities Posing as the Voice of the Whole Church
Constantinople III and Constantinople IV: Minorities Posing as the Voice of the Whole Church
Abstract Decisions at ecumenical councils required ‘unanimous’ consensus. This paper treats two councils, Constantinople III (680–81) and Constantinople IV (869–70), which issued d...
Epistle of Pope Sixtus (Xistus) III to Proclus, archbishop of Constantinople
Epistle of Pope Sixtus (Xistus) III to Proclus, archbishop of Constantinople
This work includes a translation from Latin of the epistle of Pope Sixtus (Xistus) III to Archbishop Proclus of Constantinople (437), as well as an introductory article and histori...

Back to Top