Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures Associated with Extra-articular Distal One-third Tibia Fractures – Is It Necessary?

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Fractures involving the distal third of both bone leg are one of the common long bone fractures with significant concern owing to the amount of soft-tissue damage incurred and poor prognosis with respect to fracture fixation. Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether fibula fixation is necessary along with internal fixation of extra-articular distal tibia fractures by comparing the clinico-radiological and functional outcome of patients of extra-articular distal third tibia fractures with fibula “fixed” and fibula “not fixed” group. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study with a sample size of 30 patients was conducted in Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research between March 2023 and May 2024. Fibula fixation was done in one group, and the fibula was not fixed in the control group. Research methodology includes radiological evaluation for coronal and sagittal plane malalignment, Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST) scoring, and clinically, rotational malalignment and presence of post-operative infection. All cases were followed up for a minimum duration of 6 months to assess union of tibia fractures in both groups. Results: Tibial bone union rate was better in the fibula not fixed (control) group compared to the fibula fixed group (P = 0.032), confirmed by the RUST scoring (P = 0.047), which was statistically significant. Conclusion: There was no significant improvement with additional fibula fixation in the healing of distal tibia fractures, but rather causes greater morbidity in terms of wound infections and delayed healing of the tibia. This clearly demonstrates that fibula fixation in extra-articular distal tibia fractures when the fracture does not affect the syndesmosis or ankle mortise is not necessary, and is associated with a higher risk of tibial non-union. Keywords: Distal tibia, fibula, fracture, fixation, osteosynthesis.
Title: Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures Associated with Extra-articular Distal One-third Tibia Fractures – Is It Necessary?
Description:
Introduction: Fractures involving the distal third of both bone leg are one of the common long bone fractures with significant concern owing to the amount of soft-tissue damage incurred and poor prognosis with respect to fracture fixation.
Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether fibula fixation is necessary along with internal fixation of extra-articular distal tibia fractures by comparing the clinico-radiological and functional outcome of patients of extra-articular distal third tibia fractures with fibula “fixed” and fibula “not fixed” group.
Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study with a sample size of 30 patients was conducted in Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research between March 2023 and May 2024.
Fibula fixation was done in one group, and the fibula was not fixed in the control group.
Research methodology includes radiological evaluation for coronal and sagittal plane malalignment, Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST) scoring, and clinically, rotational malalignment and presence of post-operative infection.
All cases were followed up for a minimum duration of 6 months to assess union of tibia fractures in both groups.
Results: Tibial bone union rate was better in the fibula not fixed (control) group compared to the fibula fixed group (P = 0.
032), confirmed by the RUST scoring (P = 0.
047), which was statistically significant.
Conclusion: There was no significant improvement with additional fibula fixation in the healing of distal tibia fractures, but rather causes greater morbidity in terms of wound infections and delayed healing of the tibia.
This clearly demonstrates that fibula fixation in extra-articular distal tibia fractures when the fracture does not affect the syndesmosis or ankle mortise is not necessary, and is associated with a higher risk of tibial non-union.
Keywords: Distal tibia, fibula, fracture, fixation, osteosynthesis.

Related Results

Prevalence, Patterns and Associated Factors of Acute Tibia Plateau Fractures among Adults with Tibia Fractures in Uganda
Prevalence, Patterns and Associated Factors of Acute Tibia Plateau Fractures among Adults with Tibia Fractures in Uganda
Abstract Background: The Tibia plateau makes up one of the most critical load bearing articular surface in the human body. An injury to this vital anatomic region affects k...
Effect of Hybrid III Leg Geometry on Upper Tibia Bending Moments
Effect of Hybrid III Leg Geometry on Upper Tibia Bending Moments
<div class="htmlview paragraph">The knee and ankle joint pivots of the Hybrid III dummy's leg are positioned in approximately the same orientation as the knee and ankle joint...
Comparative Study Between Intra Medullary Nail Fixation and Plate Fixation in Distal Tibia Fracture
Comparative Study Between Intra Medullary Nail Fixation and Plate Fixation in Distal Tibia Fracture
Background: Distal tibial fractures are among the most commonly encountered long bone injuries. A variety of treatment approaches have been explored for the management of displaced...
998 Distal Radius Fractures – Assessing Time to Surgery
998 Distal Radius Fractures – Assessing Time to Surgery
Abstract Background The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST guidelines) recommend that intra-articular d...
Distal medial tibial locking plate for fixation of extraarticular distal humeral fractures; an alternative choice for fixation
Distal medial tibial locking plate for fixation of extraarticular distal humeral fractures; an alternative choice for fixation
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to describe an alternative fixation method for distal humeral extra-articular fractures through posterior approach using distal tibia ...

Back to Top