Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

De blinde vlek in praktijk en discussie rond orgaandonatie

View through CrossRef
De blinde vlek in praktijk en discussie rond orgaandonatie In countries like Belgium and The Netherlands, there seems to be overwhelming public acceptance of transplantation and organ donation. Yet, paradoxically, part of the public refuses post-mortal donation of their own organs or of those of family members. It is customary within the transplantation context to accept the refusal of organ donation by family members “in order to accommodate their feelings”. I argue that this attitude does not take seriously what is really behind the refusal of donation by (at least some) family members. My hypothesis is that even in very secularized societies, this refusal is determined by cultural-symbolic attitudes vis-à-vis the (dead) human body (and some of its parts). The blind spot for this reality, both in the practice of and discussions around organ donation, prevents understanding of what is producing the paradox mentioned.
Title: De blinde vlek in praktijk en discussie rond orgaandonatie
Description:
De blinde vlek in praktijk en discussie rond orgaandonatie In countries like Belgium and The Netherlands, there seems to be overwhelming public acceptance of transplantation and organ donation.
Yet, paradoxically, part of the public refuses post-mortal donation of their own organs or of those of family members.
It is customary within the transplantation context to accept the refusal of organ donation by family members “in order to accommodate their feelings”.
I argue that this attitude does not take seriously what is really behind the refusal of donation by (at least some) family members.
My hypothesis is that even in very secularized societies, this refusal is determined by cultural-symbolic attitudes vis-à-vis the (dead) human body (and some of its parts).
The blind spot for this reality, both in the practice of and discussions around organ donation, prevents understanding of what is producing the paradox mentioned.

Related Results

De blinde vlek van burgerschapsonderwijs
De blinde vlek van burgerschapsonderwijs
De blinde vlek van burgerschapsonderwijs The most relevant part of a discussion is not what is discussed but what cannot be spoken of. The real taboos are those for which...
De ontdekkingsreis
De ontdekkingsreis
De Blinde Vlek The most relevant part of a discussion is not what is discussed but what cannot be spoken of. The real taboos are those for which it is taboo to call them ...
De blinde vlek in corporatieland
De blinde vlek in corporatieland
The most relevant part of a discussion is not what is discussed but what cannot be spoken of. The real taboos are those for which it is taboo to call them taboos. The status quo de...
De blinde vlek van kieswijzers
De blinde vlek van kieswijzers
The most relevant part of a discussion is not what is discussed but what cannot be spoken of. The real taboos are those for which it is taboo to call them taboos. The status quo de...
De blinde vlek van de witte onschuld
De blinde vlek van de witte onschuld
The most relevant part of a discussion is not what is discussed but what cannot be spoken of. The real taboos are those for which it is taboo to call them taboos. The status quo de...
Nieuwe rubriek: De Blinde Vlek
Nieuwe rubriek: De Blinde Vlek
The most relevant part of a discussion is not what is discussed but what cannot be spoken of. The real taboos are those for which it is taboo to call them taboos. The status quo de...
Beleid en de blinde vlek van het beperken
Beleid en de blinde vlek van het beperken
Beleid en de blinde vlek van het beperken Complexiteit van wetgeving en stapeling van beleid vormen een knelpunt voor burgers, ondernemers en uitvoering. Deze toenemende ...

Back to Top