Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Domain Name Disputes and Their Resolution under UDRP Route: A Review
View through CrossRef
Domain names have a dual role in today’s internet driven market place – to map IP addresses and to act as identifier of trademark of a company. Unlike trademarks, domain names are not sufficiently protected by the laws of a country. There is no uniformity to protect domain names among the laws of various countries. In order to protect the domain names and bring uniformity, ICANN developed the Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy (UDRP). In this research, the various kinds of domain name abuses are identified. The application of UDRP, domain name registration process and dispute resolution service process are examined. The major domain name dispute cases resolved under UPRP by WIPO are studied. It has been found that UDRP is applicable to generic top level domains (gTLDs) and new gTLDs. It is much less relevant for country code top level domains (ccTLDs). The losing party still has the option of appealing to a court of competent jurisdiction in case of gTLDs and new gTLDs. However, this option is seldom exercised. In order to protect the domain names in a better way, there is a need to bring uniformity to domain name laws of various countries. ICANN should formulate a model domain names dispute resolution law for adoption by various countries. Also, there is a need to strengthen the UDRP.
Title: Domain Name Disputes and Their Resolution under UDRP Route: A Review
Description:
Domain names have a dual role in today’s internet driven market place – to map IP addresses and to act as identifier of trademark of a company.
Unlike trademarks, domain names are not sufficiently protected by the laws of a country.
There is no uniformity to protect domain names among the laws of various countries.
In order to protect the domain names and bring uniformity, ICANN developed the Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy (UDRP).
In this research, the various kinds of domain name abuses are identified.
The application of UDRP, domain name registration process and dispute resolution service process are examined.
The major domain name dispute cases resolved under UPRP by WIPO are studied.
It has been found that UDRP is applicable to generic top level domains (gTLDs) and new gTLDs.
It is much less relevant for country code top level domains (ccTLDs).
The losing party still has the option of appealing to a court of competent jurisdiction in case of gTLDs and new gTLDs.
However, this option is seldom exercised.
In order to protect the domain names in a better way, there is a need to bring uniformity to domain name laws of various countries.
ICANN should formulate a model domain names dispute resolution law for adoption by various countries.
Also, there is a need to strengthen the UDRP.
Related Results
Domain Name Law And Practice
Domain Name Law And Practice
Abstract
An established authority in the field, this work provides comprehensive analysis of the law and practice relating to internet domain names at an internation...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Legal Aspects of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Sports Law. Doctoral Thesis
Legal Aspects of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Sports Law. Doctoral Thesis
Doctoral Thesis “Legal Aspects of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Sports Law” is a scientific research where issues that arise from the legal relations of subjects of sports law,...
Legal Aspects of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Sports Law. Summary of the Doctoral Thesis
Legal Aspects of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Sports Law. Summary of the Doctoral Thesis
Doctoral Thesis “Legal Aspects of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Sports Law” is a scientific research where issues that arise from the legal relations of subjects of sports law,...
Managing cross-border disputes in telecommunications: A case study approach
Managing cross-border disputes in telecommunications: A case study approach
Managing cross-border disputes in telecommunications is a complex challenge that involves navigating diverse legal frameworks, regulatory environments, and cultural contexts. This ...
Necessity of Introducing ADR in Land Related Disputes Settlement
Necessity of Introducing ADR in Land Related Disputes Settlement
The pivotal role of land in the different aspects of our lives cannot be neglected. Issues relating to land administration, access to land, resolution of land disputes, land use pl...
Medication-related disputes in Beijing China from 2013 to 2019
Medication-related disputes in Beijing China from 2013 to 2019
Objectives Through searching and summarizing the medication-related
disputes and claims in Beijing, we found the factors that were most
likely to cause disputes during the medicati...
URGENSI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HUKUM DALAM DUNIA INDUSTRI
URGENSI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HUKUM DALAM DUNIA INDUSTRI
A dispute must be resolved peacefully and through negotiations between the two parties to the dispute. Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes can be done through litigation or...

