Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Multiphoton fluorescent images with a spatially varying background signal: a ML deconvolution method

View through CrossRef
SummaryBy means of multiphoton laser scanning microscopy, neuroscientists can look inside the brain deeper than has ever been possible before. Multiphoton fluorescent images, as all optical images, suffer from degradation caused by a variety of sources (e.g. light dispersion and absorption in the tissue, laser fluctuations, spurious photodetection and staining deficiency). From a modelling perspective, such degradations can be considered the sum of stochastic noise and a background signal. Among the methods proposed in the literature to perform image deconvolution in either confocal or multiphoton fluorescent microscopy, Vicidomini et al. (2009) were the first to incorporate models for noise (a Poisson process) and background signal (spatially constant) in the context of regularized inverse problems. Unfortunately, the so‐called split‐gradient deconvolution method (SGM) they used did not consider possible spatial variations in the background signal. In this paper, we extend the SGM by adding a maximum‐likelihood estimation step for the determination of a spatially varying background signal. We demonstrate that the assumption of a constant background is not always valid in multiphoton laser microscopy and by using synthetic and actual multiphoton fluorescent images, we evaluate the face of validity of the proposed method, and compare its accuracy with the previously introduced SGM algorithm.
Title: Multiphoton fluorescent images with a spatially varying background signal: a ML deconvolution method
Description:
SummaryBy means of multiphoton laser scanning microscopy, neuroscientists can look inside the brain deeper than has ever been possible before.
Multiphoton fluorescent images, as all optical images, suffer from degradation caused by a variety of sources (e.
g.
light dispersion and absorption in the tissue, laser fluctuations, spurious photodetection and staining deficiency).
From a modelling perspective, such degradations can be considered the sum of stochastic noise and a background signal.
Among the methods proposed in the literature to perform image deconvolution in either confocal or multiphoton fluorescent microscopy, Vicidomini et al.
(2009) were the first to incorporate models for noise (a Poisson process) and background signal (spatially constant) in the context of regularized inverse problems.
Unfortunately, the so‐called split‐gradient deconvolution method (SGM) they used did not consider possible spatial variations in the background signal.
In this paper, we extend the SGM by adding a maximum‐likelihood estimation step for the determination of a spatially varying background signal.
We demonstrate that the assumption of a constant background is not always valid in multiphoton laser microscopy and by using synthetic and actual multiphoton fluorescent images, we evaluate the face of validity of the proposed method, and compare its accuracy with the previously introduced SGM algorithm.

Related Results

Multiphoton simultaneous multislice imaging
Multiphoton simultaneous multislice imaging
AbstractPurposeTo develop multiphoton excitation techniques for simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging and evaluate their performance and specific absorption rate (SAR) benefit. To ...
Sparsity‐enhanced wavelet deconvolution
Sparsity‐enhanced wavelet deconvolution
ABSTRACTWe propose a three‐step bandwidth enhancing wavelet deconvolution process, combining linear inverse filtering and non‐linear reflectivity construction based on a sparseness...
Restoring Erroneous or Missing Rates in Interfering Wells Using Multiwell Deconvolution
Restoring Erroneous or Missing Rates in Interfering Wells Using Multiwell Deconvolution
Abstract Objectives/Scope Single well deconvolution (von Schroeter et al., 2001) has been added to the well test interpretation ...
Multiphoton Fluorescence Light Microscopy
Multiphoton Fluorescence Light Microscopy
Abstract Multiphoton fluorescence microscopy is a powerful imaging technique that depends on complex quantum mechanical interacti...
Multiphoton Fluorescence Light Microscopy
Multiphoton Fluorescence Light Microscopy
Abstract Multiphoton fluorescence microscopy is a powerful imaging technique that depends on complex quantum mechanical interacti...
Klauder wavelet removal before vibroseis deconvolution
Klauder wavelet removal before vibroseis deconvolution
The spiking deconvolution of a field seismic trace requires that the seismic wavelet on the trace be minimum phase. On a dynamite trace, the component wavelets due to the effects o...
Wave Scattering Deconvolution
Wave Scattering Deconvolution
ABSTRACT The least-squares approach is commonly used for spiking and predictive deconvolution. An alternative approach is wave scattering deconvolution (WSD) prop...
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...

Back to Top