Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Restoring Erroneous or Missing Rates in Interfering Wells Using Multiwell Deconvolution
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Objectives/Scope
Single well deconvolution (von Schroeter et al., 2001) has been added to the well test interpretation toolbox nearly twenty years ago. In recent years, the single well deconvolution algorithm has been extended to multiple interfering wells (Cumming et al., 2013), and further improved with the additions of constraints to account for existing a-priory knowledge on the reservoir (constrained multiwell deconvolution, Cumming et al., 2019).
The main objective of multiwell deconvolution is to identify the signatures of all wells involved and the interference signals between wells, from which information can be extracted about the reservoir that may not be obtainable otherwise, e.g. heterogeneities, boundaries and compartmentalization. The single well deconvolution algorithm has also been shown to be capable of restoring erroneous or missing rates (Gringarten, 2010).
As shown in this paper, the same is true with multiwell deconvolution, which is able to restore erroneous or missing rates in all the wells involved.
Methods, Procedures, Process
Starting with arbitrary initial guesses for the missing rates in the various wells involved, we use multiwell deconvolution to estimate these missing flow rates or correct for erroneous ones.
Two methods are presented: (1) we use unconstrained multiwell deconvolution as a first step to estimate the missing/erroneous rates, then use constrained multiwell deconvolution with these rates to estimate deconvolved derivatives; and (2) we restore/correct the flow rates and derive deconvolved derivatives simultaneously using constrained multiwell deconvolution. We show that the first approach is more accurate than the second one. In both approaches, we only obtain rates that are proportional to the true flow rates. To obtain the true flow rates, we need to know either one of the actual flow rates in each well, or the corresponding permeabilities.
Results, Observations, Conclusions
We prove the ability of multiwell deconvolution to estimate rates on synthetic oil reservoirs and gas reservoirs with moderate average reservoir pressure depletion, that include non-interfering wells. We then apply to oil and gas field examples and compare restored vs. actually measured rates. In all cases, the agreement is very good.
Novel/Additive Information
Using only measured pressure data, constrained multiwell deconvolution can be used to restore unknown flow rates and/or correct for erroneous rates, in addition to estimating deconvolved derivatives of all wells. This is particularly useful in the case of allocated rates or when rates are missing in some of the interfering wells.
Title: Restoring Erroneous or Missing Rates in Interfering Wells Using Multiwell Deconvolution
Description:
Abstract
Objectives/Scope
Single well deconvolution (von Schroeter et al.
, 2001) has been added to the well test interpretation toolbox nearly twenty years ago.
In recent years, the single well deconvolution algorithm has been extended to multiple interfering wells (Cumming et al.
, 2013), and further improved with the additions of constraints to account for existing a-priory knowledge on the reservoir (constrained multiwell deconvolution, Cumming et al.
, 2019).
The main objective of multiwell deconvolution is to identify the signatures of all wells involved and the interference signals between wells, from which information can be extracted about the reservoir that may not be obtainable otherwise, e.
g.
heterogeneities, boundaries and compartmentalization.
The single well deconvolution algorithm has also been shown to be capable of restoring erroneous or missing rates (Gringarten, 2010).
As shown in this paper, the same is true with multiwell deconvolution, which is able to restore erroneous or missing rates in all the wells involved.
Methods, Procedures, Process
Starting with arbitrary initial guesses for the missing rates in the various wells involved, we use multiwell deconvolution to estimate these missing flow rates or correct for erroneous ones.
Two methods are presented: (1) we use unconstrained multiwell deconvolution as a first step to estimate the missing/erroneous rates, then use constrained multiwell deconvolution with these rates to estimate deconvolved derivatives; and (2) we restore/correct the flow rates and derive deconvolved derivatives simultaneously using constrained multiwell deconvolution.
We show that the first approach is more accurate than the second one.
In both approaches, we only obtain rates that are proportional to the true flow rates.
To obtain the true flow rates, we need to know either one of the actual flow rates in each well, or the corresponding permeabilities.
Results, Observations, Conclusions
We prove the ability of multiwell deconvolution to estimate rates on synthetic oil reservoirs and gas reservoirs with moderate average reservoir pressure depletion, that include non-interfering wells.
We then apply to oil and gas field examples and compare restored vs.
actually measured rates.
In all cases, the agreement is very good.
Novel/Additive Information
Using only measured pressure data, constrained multiwell deconvolution can be used to restore unknown flow rates and/or correct for erroneous rates, in addition to estimating deconvolved derivatives of all wells.
This is particularly useful in the case of allocated rates or when rates are missing in some of the interfering wells.
Related Results
Field Applications of Constrained Multiwell Deconvolution
Field Applications of Constrained Multiwell Deconvolution
Abstract
Objectives/Scope
This paper applies a new constrained multiwell deconvolution algorithm to two field cases: a gas reser...
Calibration of Old Well Log Data Using a Multiwell Environment
Calibration of Old Well Log Data Using a Multiwell Environment
ABSTRACT
This paper reviews the implementation of a special multiwell calibration technique to transform and normalise old well data within a petrophysical study. On...
Sparsity‐enhanced wavelet deconvolution
Sparsity‐enhanced wavelet deconvolution
ABSTRACTWe propose a three‐step bandwidth enhancing wavelet deconvolution process, combining linear inverse filtering and non‐linear reflectivity construction based on a sparseness...
Klauder wavelet removal before vibroseis deconvolution
Klauder wavelet removal before vibroseis deconvolution
The spiking deconvolution of a field seismic trace requires that the seismic wavelet on the trace be minimum phase. On a dynamite trace, the component wavelets due to the effects o...
Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a survey on horizontal gas well activity throughout the world. The survey was conducted for the Gas Research Institute...
Multiwell Thermal Interaction: Predicting Wellbore and Formation Temperatures for Closely Spaced Wells
Multiwell Thermal Interaction: Predicting Wellbore and Formation Temperatures for Closely Spaced Wells
Abstract
A method is presented to predict wellbore and formation temperatures for a template of closely spaced wells. Multiwell thermal interaction will alter the we...
Deconvolution of Multiwell Test Data
Deconvolution of Multiwell Test Data
Abstract
The deconvolution analysis technique that evolved with development of the deconvolution algorithms by von Schroeter et al.1 and Levitan et al.2, 3 became a ...
Wave Scattering Deconvolution
Wave Scattering Deconvolution
ABSTRACT
The least-squares approach is commonly used for spiking and predictive deconvolution. An alternative approach is wave scattering deconvolution (WSD) prop...

