Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Multicriteria Mapping Manual: Version 4.0

View through CrossRef
This MCM Manual offers basic advice on how to do multicriteria mapping (MCM). It suggests how to: go about designing and building a typical MCM project; engage with participants; analyse results; and get the most out of the online MCM tool.&nbsp;<span>The online MCM software tool provides its own operational help. So this Manual is more focused on the general approach. There are no rigid rules. MCM is structured, but very flexible. It allows many more detailed features than can be covered here. MCM users are encouraged to think for themselves and be responsible and creative. But there are some key underlying MCM values. The most crucial are as follows: 1) Inclusion: MCM aims to promote more inclusive, equitable and accessible appraisal. This means engaging in a respectful and balanced way, with a diversity of relevant perspectives – especially those most often marginalized. 2) Opening Up: MCM aims to help ‘open up’ appraisal. This means giving balanced attention to exploring and illuminating contending views. Using MCM just to aggregate a single final view has the effect instead of ‘closing down’. 3) Agency: MCM aims to ‘put participants in the driving seat’. An MCM project should be designed, implemented and analysed to maximise the agency of participants over the ways in which their own perspectives are represented. 4) Transparency: MCM only ‘opens up’, if results are conveyed fully and clearly to all parties with an interest in debates over the focal goal. Depending on context, this means publishing results and giving reasonable access to data. This Manual gives advice on how these values can best be realised in practice.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>
Title: Multicriteria Mapping Manual: Version 4.0
Description:
This MCM Manual offers basic advice on how to do multicriteria mapping (MCM).
It suggests how to: go about designing and building a typical MCM project; engage with participants; analyse results; and get the most out of the online MCM tool.
&nbsp;<span>The online MCM software tool provides its own operational help.
So this Manual is more focused on the general approach.
There are no rigid rules.
MCM is structured, but very flexible.
It allows many more detailed features than can be covered here.
MCM users are encouraged to think for themselves and be responsible and creative.
But there are some key underlying MCM values.
The most crucial are as follows: 1) Inclusion: MCM aims to promote more inclusive, equitable and accessible appraisal.
This means engaging in a respectful and balanced way, with a diversity of relevant perspectives – especially those most often marginalized.
2) Opening Up: MCM aims to help ‘open up’ appraisal.
This means giving balanced attention to exploring and illuminating contending views.
Using MCM just to aggregate a single final view has the effect instead of ‘closing down’.
3) Agency: MCM aims to ‘put participants in the driving seat’.
An MCM project should be designed, implemented and analysed to maximise the agency of participants over the ways in which their own perspectives are represented.
4) Transparency: MCM only ‘opens up’, if results are conveyed fully and clearly to all parties with an interest in debates over the focal goal.
Depending on context, this means publishing results and giving reasonable access to data.
This Manual gives advice on how these values can best be realised in practice.
&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>.

Related Results

Mapping workflow trends in pulsed-field ablation procedures: an international glimpse
Mapping workflow trends in pulsed-field ablation procedures: an international glimpse
Abstract Background As pulsed field ablation (PFA) is increasingly used in the EP lab, the use of mapping, fluoroscopy, and intr...
Metachoice for benchmarking: a case study
Metachoice for benchmarking: a case study
Purpose – In a previous paper the authors emphasized the advantages of multicriteria methodologies to evaluate business performance. The purpose of this paper is to...
Bounded Rationality and Multicriteria Decision Aiding
Bounded Rationality and Multicriteria Decision Aiding
Compared to deciding under a single criterion, in Multicriteria Decision Aiding the role of the decision-maker is much more predominant. This is because in the former case, once th...
Comparison of LA and PVC mapping using OCTARAY and OPTRELL catheters
Comparison of LA and PVC mapping using OCTARAY and OPTRELL catheters
Abstract Background Multielectrode mapping catheters, such as the OCTARAY and OPTRELL, are essential in creating myocardial ele...
Transition to Version 2 of the PDS4 Information Model.
Transition to Version 2 of the PDS4 Information Model.
IntroductionThe NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) released version 1.0 of the PDS4 Information Model (IM) in May 2013. Now in version 1.22, the PDS4 IM has undergone a series of reg...
Multicriteria Mapping Manual. Version 1.0.
Multicriteria Mapping Manual. Version 1.0.
This Manual offers basic advice on how to do multicriteria mapping (MCM). It suggests how to: go about designing and building a typical MCM project;; engage with participants and a...
mSTAR: Multicriteria Spatio Temporal Altimetry Retracking
mSTAR: Multicriteria Spatio Temporal Altimetry Retracking
&lt;p&gt;Observing coastal sea-level change from satellite altimetry is challenging due to land influence on the estimated sea surface height (SSH), significant wave height...

Back to Top