Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cognitive Systems and the Scientific Explanation of Cognition
View through CrossRef
A cognitive system is any real system that has some cognitive property. Therefore, cognitive systems are a special type of K-systems (see chapter 3, section 3). Note that this definition includes both natural systems such as humans and other animals, and artificial devices such as robots, implementations of AI (artificial intelligence) programs, some implementations of neural networks, etc. Focusing on what all cognitive systems have in common, we can state a very general but nonetheless interesting thesis: All cognitive systems are dynamical systems. Section 2 explains what this thesis means and why it is (relatively) uncontroversial. It will become clear that this thesis is a basic methodological assumption that underlies practically all current research in cognitive science. The goal of section 3 is to contrast two styles of scientific explanation of cognition: computational and dynamical. Computational explanations are characterized by the use of concepts drawn from computation theory, while dynamical explanations employ the conceptual apparatus of dynamical systems theory. Further, I will suggest that all scientific explanations of cognition might end up sharing the same dynamical style, for dynamical systems theory may well turn out to be useful in the study of all types of models currently employed in cognitive science. In particular, a dynamical viewpoint might even benefit those scientific explanations of cognition which are based on symbolic models. Computational explanations of cognition, by contrast, can only be based on symbolic models or, more generally, on any other type of computational model. In particular, those scientific explanations of cognition which are based on an important class of connectionist models cannot be computational, for this class of models falls beyond the scope of computation theory. Arguing for this negative conclusion requires the formal explication of the concept of a computational system that I gave in chapter 1 (see definition 3). Finally, section 4 explores the possibility that scientific explanations of cognition might be based on Galilean models of cognitive systems (see chapter 3, section 5). Most cognitive scientists have not yet considered this possibility. The goals of this section are to contrast this proposal with the current modeling practice in cognitive science, to make clear its potential benefits, and to indicate possible ways to implement it.
Title: Cognitive Systems and the Scientific Explanation of Cognition
Description:
A cognitive system is any real system that has some cognitive property.
Therefore, cognitive systems are a special type of K-systems (see chapter 3, section 3).
Note that this definition includes both natural systems such as humans and other animals, and artificial devices such as robots, implementations of AI (artificial intelligence) programs, some implementations of neural networks, etc.
Focusing on what all cognitive systems have in common, we can state a very general but nonetheless interesting thesis: All cognitive systems are dynamical systems.
Section 2 explains what this thesis means and why it is (relatively) uncontroversial.
It will become clear that this thesis is a basic methodological assumption that underlies practically all current research in cognitive science.
The goal of section 3 is to contrast two styles of scientific explanation of cognition: computational and dynamical.
Computational explanations are characterized by the use of concepts drawn from computation theory, while dynamical explanations employ the conceptual apparatus of dynamical systems theory.
Further, I will suggest that all scientific explanations of cognition might end up sharing the same dynamical style, for dynamical systems theory may well turn out to be useful in the study of all types of models currently employed in cognitive science.
In particular, a dynamical viewpoint might even benefit those scientific explanations of cognition which are based on symbolic models.
Computational explanations of cognition, by contrast, can only be based on symbolic models or, more generally, on any other type of computational model.
In particular, those scientific explanations of cognition which are based on an important class of connectionist models cannot be computational, for this class of models falls beyond the scope of computation theory.
Arguing for this negative conclusion requires the formal explication of the concept of a computational system that I gave in chapter 1 (see definition 3).
Finally, section 4 explores the possibility that scientific explanations of cognition might be based on Galilean models of cognitive systems (see chapter 3, section 5).
Most cognitive scientists have not yet considered this possibility.
The goals of this section are to contrast this proposal with the current modeling practice in cognitive science, to make clear its potential benefits, and to indicate possible ways to implement it.
Related Results
Extended Cognition
Extended Cognition
Extended cognition takes the idea that your mind is ‘on’ your smartphone literally. It says that human cognitive states and processes sometimes spill outside our heads and into obj...
S68. DIFFERENTIAL PATTERN OF SOCIAL COGNITION IMPAIRMENT BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN DWELLING PATIENTS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND ITS FUNCTIONAL CORRELATES
S68. DIFFERENTIAL PATTERN OF SOCIAL COGNITION IMPAIRMENT BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN DWELLING PATIENTS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND ITS FUNCTIONAL CORRELATES
Abstract
Background
Cognitive deficits (both neuro & social Cognition) play a vital role in determining functional status in...
Effects of Contextual Cues on False Memory: A Comparative Experimental Approach
Effects of Contextual Cues on False Memory: A Comparative Experimental Approach
Research on false memory formation using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm has been extensively conducted in Western contexts. Yet, a significant gap remains in experimen...
C-PLACID - Computational PLatform for Assessment of Cognition In Dementia - EPSRC
C-PLACID - Computational PLatform for Assessment of Cognition In Dementia - EPSRC
Cognitive impairment is the hallmark of dementia. Cognitive problems, such as difficulties with memory, language and reasoning, are the most obvious, frustrating and debilitating a...
Causal explanation
Causal explanation
An explanation is an answer to a why-question, and so a causal explanation is an answer to ‘Why X?’ that says something about the causes of X. For example, ‘Because it rained’ as a...
Cognition in eco, cognition in vitro - Mesure, explication, et contextualité en sciences cognitives
Cognition in eco, cognition in vitro - Mesure, explication, et contextualité en sciences cognitives
L’explication des comportements humains par la psychologie cognitive s’appuie implicitement sur l’hypothèse de l’individuation fonctionnelle de l’architecture cognitive, qui induit...
Strategy-based Cognitive Rehabilitation for Childhood Brain Tumour: Protocol for an Acceptability and Feasibility Trial of the Fatigue, Learning, and Memory Enrichment (FLaME) intervention
Strategy-based Cognitive Rehabilitation for Childhood Brain Tumour: Protocol for an Acceptability and Feasibility Trial of the Fatigue, Learning, and Memory Enrichment (FLaME) intervention
ABSTRACT
Background
Medical treatments have improved survival rates for paediatric brain tumour (PBT), but the condition and tr...
Computation, Dynamics, and Cognition
Computation, Dynamics, and Cognition
Currently there is growing interest in the application of dynamical methods to the study of cognition. Computation, Dynamics, and Cognition investigates this convergence from a the...

