Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Long-term survival and outcomes according to age for patients underwent to transcatheter aortic valve replacement
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Transcatheter Aortic valve Replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. It is widely known the short and mid-term outcomes, however, is limited about long-term outcomes in according to age. The 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease recommended TAVR in older patients ≥75 years or in those who are high risk. The aim of this study was to determine the survival and the factors predicting mortality after TAVR in according to age.
Methods
From April 2008 to December 2020, a total of 991 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVR with balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves were included. Primary outcomes and survival analysed on base to age <75 years and ≥75 years old.
Results
The mean age in patients <75 compared with ≥75 years, was 68.2±7.5 vs. 81.4±3.8 years and STS score were 4.24±3.1% vs. 5.4±3.1%. In-hospital mortality was 3.8% vs. 3.1%, (OR= 0.825, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.034–2.037, p=0.676, and the combined endpoint of death, vascular complications, myocardial infarction, major bleeding or stroke was 13.4% vs. 17.8%, OR = 1.39 95% CI 0.842–2.309) p=0.195, respectively.
When compared both groups (75 compared with ≥75 years) in the follow-up, there were no differences in tbleeding 5.7% vs. 3.8% (HR = 0.584 [IC95% 0.278–21.226], p=0.155), myocardial infarction 5% vs. 2.1% (HR = 0.447 [IC95% 0.209–1,090], p=0.08), stroke 5.7% vs. 9.9% (HR = 1.617 [IC95% 0.812–3.219], p=0.171) and mortality 47.2% vs. 44.8% (HR=0.862 [IC95% 0.672–1.105], p=0.241) and there was difference in between groups by hospitalizations for heart failure 16.4% vs. 10.3% (HR = 0.583 [IC95% 0.373–0.912], p=0.018
Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were similar in both groups (75 compared with ≥75 years): 74.8% vs. 83.4%, 61.1 vs. 69.6%, 45 vs. 51.1% and 35% vs. 31.8% log Rank 1.551, p=0.213, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 44.8±31 months.
The predictors of cumulative mortality were in patients <75 years: Charlson index (HR 1.283 [95% CI 1.037–1.587], p=0.022) and STS score (HR 1.224 [95% CI 1.095–1.368], p=0.001) and the predictors in patients with ≥75 years in addition to Charlson index and STS score, were: Stroke postTAVR (HR 2.692 [95% CI 1.380–5.228], p=0.003), Frailty (HR 1.634 [95% CI 1.159–2.034], p=0.005), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.407 [95% CI 0.191–01.867], p=0,020], COPD (HR 1.472 [95% CI 1.043–2.077], p=0,003], mitral regurgitation post-TAVR (HR 1.190 [1.006–1.409], p=0.043.
Conclusions
TAVR is associated with significant survival benefit throughout 3.29 years of follow-up in both groups. Survival during follow-up was similar in patients with <75 compared with ≥75 years old, but they present some differences in the predictors of mortality, with a greater impact of complications post-TAVR in the elderly.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Title: Long-term survival and outcomes according to age for patients underwent to transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Description:
Abstract
Background
Transcatheter Aortic valve Replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement.
It is widely known the short and mid-term outcomes, however, is limited about long-term outcomes in according to age.
The 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease recommended TAVR in older patients ≥75 years or in those who are high risk.
The aim of this study was to determine the survival and the factors predicting mortality after TAVR in according to age.
Methods
From April 2008 to December 2020, a total of 991 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVR with balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves were included.
Primary outcomes and survival analysed on base to age <75 years and ≥75 years old.
Results
The mean age in patients <75 compared with ≥75 years, was 68.
2±7.
5 vs.
81.
4±3.
8 years and STS score were 4.
24±3.
1% vs.
5.
4±3.
1%.
In-hospital mortality was 3.
8% vs.
3.
1%, (OR= 0.
825, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.
034–2.
037, p=0.
676, and the combined endpoint of death, vascular complications, myocardial infarction, major bleeding or stroke was 13.
4% vs.
17.
8%, OR = 1.
39 95% CI 0.
842–2.
309) p=0.
195, respectively.
When compared both groups (75 compared with ≥75 years) in the follow-up, there were no differences in tbleeding 5.
7% vs.
3.
8% (HR = 0.
584 [IC95% 0.
278–21.
226], p=0.
155), myocardial infarction 5% vs.
2.
1% (HR = 0.
447 [IC95% 0.
209–1,090], p=0.
08), stroke 5.
7% vs.
9.
9% (HR = 1.
617 [IC95% 0.
812–3.
219], p=0.
171) and mortality 47.
2% vs.
44.
8% (HR=0.
862 [IC95% 0.
672–1.
105], p=0.
241) and there was difference in between groups by hospitalizations for heart failure 16.
4% vs.
10.
3% (HR = 0.
583 [IC95% 0.
373–0.
912], p=0.
018
Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were similar in both groups (75 compared with ≥75 years): 74.
8% vs.
83.
4%, 61.
1 vs.
69.
6%, 45 vs.
51.
1% and 35% vs.
31.
8% log Rank 1.
551, p=0.
213, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 44.
8±31 months.
The predictors of cumulative mortality were in patients <75 years: Charlson index (HR 1.
283 [95% CI 1.
037–1.
587], p=0.
022) and STS score (HR 1.
224 [95% CI 1.
095–1.
368], p=0.
001) and the predictors in patients with ≥75 years in addition to Charlson index and STS score, were: Stroke postTAVR (HR 2.
692 [95% CI 1.
380–5.
228], p=0.
003), Frailty (HR 1.
634 [95% CI 1.
159–2.
034], p=0.
005), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.
407 [95% CI 0.
191–01.
867], p=0,020], COPD (HR 1.
472 [95% CI 1.
043–2.
077], p=0,003], mitral regurgitation post-TAVR (HR 1.
190 [1.
006–1.
409], p=0.
043.
Conclusions
TAVR is associated with significant survival benefit throughout 3.
29 years of follow-up in both groups.
Survival during follow-up was similar in patients with <75 compared with ≥75 years old, but they present some differences in the predictors of mortality, with a greater impact of complications post-TAVR in the elderly.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Related Results
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve disease be...
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Background Aortic root dilatation and aortic insufficiency can
occur in patients with prior conotruncal defect surgery, the Ross
procedure, and connective tissue disease (CTD). Val...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives
To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia.
...
Abstract 10999: Long-Term Outcomes of Atrioventricular Valve Regurgitation and Repair in Patients With Single Ventricle Physiology
Abstract 10999: Long-Term Outcomes of Atrioventricular Valve Regurgitation and Repair in Patients With Single Ventricle Physiology
Introduction:
In single ventricle patients, AV valve regurgitation increases the risk of adverse outcomes, and staged palliation with concomitant AV valve intervention ...
Should bioprostheses be considered the valve of choice for dialysis-dependent patients?
Should bioprostheses be considered the valve of choice for dialysis-dependent patients?
Abstract
Background
There is controversy regarding the choice of prosthetic valves in patients with cardiac valve disease and dialysis-dependent ...
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
AbstractRecent echocardiographic studies described that almost 30% of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis on the basis of aortic valve area may paradoxically have a relative...
Infective endocarditis of quadricuspid aortic valve
Infective endocarditis of quadricuspid aortic valve
Abstract
Background
Infective endocarditis of the aortic valve is a relatively common disease presentation, with surgical intervention a mainstay of...
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Pathology: Current Evidence and Technical Challenges
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Pathology: Current Evidence and Technical Challenges
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapy for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (AS) in patients at high and intermediate risk for surgical ao...

