Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Policing Indefinite Detention

View through CrossRef
The United States Department of Defense’s (DOD) refusal to disclose the identities of the detainees at Guantánamo Bay allows the International Criminal Court (ICC) to take jurisdiction over the detainees and their cases under Article 17 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Specifically, this article argues that the DOD’s refusal to identify the detainees is a decision not to prosecute the detainees; it demonstrated actual unwillingness of the United States to prosecute the detainees. The United States’ failure to initiate independent and impartial proceedings against the detainees in a manner consistent with an intent to bring the detainees to justice proves unwillingness within the meaning of the Rome Statute. Mostly because the United States refused to identify the detainees, the national judicial system was wholly unavailable to them. These factors, unwillingness to prosecute, unjustified delay, and inability to prosecute, combine to form ICC jurisdiction over the detainees’ cases under Article 17 of the Rome Statute. With this jurisdiction, the ICC can extradite, indict, and ultimately dispose of the detainees’ cases.
Elsevier BV
Title: Policing Indefinite Detention
Description:
The United States Department of Defense’s (DOD) refusal to disclose the identities of the detainees at Guantánamo Bay allows the International Criminal Court (ICC) to take jurisdiction over the detainees and their cases under Article 17 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Specifically, this article argues that the DOD’s refusal to identify the detainees is a decision not to prosecute the detainees; it demonstrated actual unwillingness of the United States to prosecute the detainees.
The United States’ failure to initiate independent and impartial proceedings against the detainees in a manner consistent with an intent to bring the detainees to justice proves unwillingness within the meaning of the Rome Statute.
Mostly because the United States refused to identify the detainees, the national judicial system was wholly unavailable to them.
These factors, unwillingness to prosecute, unjustified delay, and inability to prosecute, combine to form ICC jurisdiction over the detainees’ cases under Article 17 of the Rome Statute.
With this jurisdiction, the ICC can extradite, indict, and ultimately dispose of the detainees’ cases.

Related Results

Detention, Inc.
Detention, Inc.
This paper addresses the influence of economic inequality on immigration detention. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) detains roughly 350,000 migrants each year an...
Towards the unification of policing innovations under community policing
Towards the unification of policing innovations under community policing
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine how various policing innovations, including problem‐oriented policing, broken windows, intelligence‐led policing, Compstat, third‐par...
Technology in policing, policing in a technological society. Special Issue brief
Technology in policing, policing in a technological society. Special Issue brief
Watson and Huey, in a 2020 article in this Journal, point out that there is still little empirical research offering a practice-focused perspective. This Special Issue responds to ...
Hot Spots Policing
Hot Spots Policing
Since the 1980s, the nature of policing has expanded beyond a person-focused approach to include a location-based approach. Recently developed proactive policing strategies that ar...
Police administrative detention
Police administrative detention
Relevance. The research relevance is predefined by the need to study the legal problems of police administrative detention and, subsequently, to create an effective administrative ...
Immigration Detention Expansion by Stealth
Immigration Detention Expansion by Stealth
A quiet but dramatic expansion of the government’s civil immigration detention power has taken place in recent years, beginning with the first Trump Administration but then taking ...
The Impact of COVID-19 on Immigration Detention
The Impact of COVID-19 on Immigration Detention
COVID-19 has spread quickly through immigration detention facilities in the United States. As of December 2, 2020, there have been over 7,500 confirmed COVID-19 cases among detaine...
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
This Campbell systematic review assesses the direct and indirect benefits of public police interventions that use procedurally just dialogue. The review summarises findings from 30...

Back to Top