Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Hot Spots Policing

View through CrossRef
Since the 1980s, the nature of policing has expanded beyond a person-focused approach to include a location-based approach. Recently developed proactive policing strategies that are concerned with the geographic distribution and explanation of crime include hot spots policing and community policing, and oftentimes problem-oriented policing, broken windows policing, third-party policing, and focused deterrence strategies. Hot spots policing entails focusing police efforts at crime prevention in a very small geographic area where crime concentrates. This strategy is one of only a few policing strategies grounded in both theory and research. Crime concentrates at places even more than it concentrates in people. Research in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in the 1980s demonstrated that 60 percent of the crime occurs at 6 percent of places (see Sherman, et al. 1989, cited under Theory and Basis of Hot Spots Policing). Place-based theories about routine activities and rational choice have led to deterrence-based strategies such as directed patrol, crackdowns, and other traditional approaches to hot spots policing, as well as more community-oriented, problem-solving, and situational crime prevention approaches at crime hot spots. Hot spots policing is one of few areas in criminal justice research that has been tested using randomized controlled trials, a gold standard for research. Several systematic reviews suggest that focusing police efforts in a small geographic area reduces crime. Furthermore, research on displacement and diffusion of benefits suggests that hot spots policing does not merely geographically displace crime. In fact, nearby places may experience a diffusion of crime benefits. Only a few studies have examined the noncrime impacts of hot spots policing, but these suggest that it does not harm public perceptions of police and may even promote informal social control. Cost-effectiveness analyses have been partially used to assess the relative costs and outcomes of hot spot policing interventions. Additionally, existing research has suggested the crime harm index (CHI) for assessing the crime impact of hot spot policing interventions. Several data sources are available from past National Institute of Justice–funded studies on hot spots of crime and hot spots policing.
Title: Hot Spots Policing
Description:
Since the 1980s, the nature of policing has expanded beyond a person-focused approach to include a location-based approach.
Recently developed proactive policing strategies that are concerned with the geographic distribution and explanation of crime include hot spots policing and community policing, and oftentimes problem-oriented policing, broken windows policing, third-party policing, and focused deterrence strategies.
Hot spots policing entails focusing police efforts at crime prevention in a very small geographic area where crime concentrates.
This strategy is one of only a few policing strategies grounded in both theory and research.
Crime concentrates at places even more than it concentrates in people.
Research in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in the 1980s demonstrated that 60 percent of the crime occurs at 6 percent of places (see Sherman, et al.
1989, cited under Theory and Basis of Hot Spots Policing).
Place-based theories about routine activities and rational choice have led to deterrence-based strategies such as directed patrol, crackdowns, and other traditional approaches to hot spots policing, as well as more community-oriented, problem-solving, and situational crime prevention approaches at crime hot spots.
Hot spots policing is one of few areas in criminal justice research that has been tested using randomized controlled trials, a gold standard for research.
Several systematic reviews suggest that focusing police efforts in a small geographic area reduces crime.
Furthermore, research on displacement and diffusion of benefits suggests that hot spots policing does not merely geographically displace crime.
In fact, nearby places may experience a diffusion of crime benefits.
Only a few studies have examined the noncrime impacts of hot spots policing, but these suggest that it does not harm public perceptions of police and may even promote informal social control.
Cost-effectiveness analyses have been partially used to assess the relative costs and outcomes of hot spot policing interventions.
Additionally, existing research has suggested the crime harm index (CHI) for assessing the crime impact of hot spot policing interventions.
Several data sources are available from past National Institute of Justice–funded studies on hot spots of crime and hot spots policing.

Related Results

Technology in policing, policing in a technological society. Special Issue brief
Technology in policing, policing in a technological society. Special Issue brief
Watson and Huey, in a 2020 article in this Journal, point out that there is still little empirical research offering a practice-focused perspective. This Special Issue responds to ...
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
This Campbell systematic review assesses the direct and indirect benefits of public police interventions that use procedurally just dialogue. The review summarises findings from 30...
Hisbah as a Model of Community Policing in Nigeria
Hisbah as a Model of Community Policing in Nigeria
As a religious police, there is an ongoing debate on whether <i>Hisbah </i>can aligned itself to the philosophy of community policing that stressed the ...
Modelling intelligence-led policing to identify its potential
Modelling intelligence-led policing to identify its potential
Modelling intelligence-led policing to identify its potential Intelligence-led policing is a concept of policing that has been applied throughout the world. Despite some ...
International Policing and Global Prohibitions
International Policing and Global Prohibitions
This chapter examines the growing cross-border reach of policing, which has become an increasingly prominent dimension of global governance. It answers ...
Maintaining hope in partnership policing
Maintaining hope in partnership policing
PurposeThis article examines how hope for an effective partnership approach to policing is maintained in everyday policing.Design/methodology/approachData collection involved 22 qu...
Faceless-Oriented Policing: Traditional Policing Theories are Not Adequate in a Cyber World
Faceless-Oriented Policing: Traditional Policing Theories are Not Adequate in a Cyber World
This article examines traditional policing theories in a cyber world and defines ‘Faceless-Oriented Policing’ (FOP). FOP policing theory is centred on cyber-world crimes. Many trad...
Czar Cullen: Police Commissioner John Cullen and Coercive State Action in Early 20th Century NZ
Czar Cullen: Police Commissioner John Cullen and Coercive State Action in Early 20th Century NZ
<p>Given the central and inherently contested role of policing in the modern state, it is striking to note the generally limited historical interest in the place of policing ...

Back to Top