Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Stan obecny i perspektywy przyjęcia przez Serbię nowego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego
View through CrossRef
The Yugoslav Act of 1982 on resolving conflict of laws with regulations of other countries is still in force in the Republic of Serbia. The law drafted over 40 years ago was considered as innovative at the time of its adoption. At present, the Serbian academic community signals the need to update the current provisions of private international law, both in the spirit of approximation with the law of the European Union and in the need to better embed this law in the present legal order of the Republic of Serbia. The draft of a new act on private international law, prepared in 2014, was not adopted yet, although it was not formally rejected as such in Serbian legislative procedures (as of April 13, 2023) either. Though not formally binding, the draft law has been cited in recent years in the Serbian law journals, being an important point of reference for considerations on questions related to private international law in Serbia. It must be admitted that the progressive Serbian academic community turned out to be an active inspirer, creator and is now also a tireless advocate of changes in the field of private international law in Serbia.Serbia, which has been an EU candidate since 2013, has no particular obligation to introduce specific solutions in the field of private international law into its national law neither before nor after accession. EU law in the field of private international law is contained in regulations that will be automatically and directly applicable in Serbia when it becomes a member of the European Union. This is a dilemma whether to adopt the provisions which, in principle, will have to be repealed after the accession. At the same time, there are several benefits of approximating the law before the accession, including accustoming legal practitioners in Serbia to apply solutions similar to those in the EU, and increasing legal certainty by applying similar solutions of private international law in transactions between entities from Serbia and the European Union (regardless of the accession prospects).The author describes and summarizes the current state of regulations in Serbian private international law and analyses the main changes proposed in the draft law of 2014. The article also presents agreements binding Serbia in the field of private international law, including the still binding 1960 Polish-Serbian agreement.
Title: Stan obecny i perspektywy przyjęcia przez Serbię nowego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego
Description:
The Yugoslav Act of 1982 on resolving conflict of laws with regulations of other countries is still in force in the Republic of Serbia.
The law drafted over 40 years ago was considered as innovative at the time of its adoption.
At present, the Serbian academic community signals the need to update the current provisions of private international law, both in the spirit of approximation with the law of the European Union and in the need to better embed this law in the present legal order of the Republic of Serbia.
The draft of a new act on private international law, prepared in 2014, was not adopted yet, although it was not formally rejected as such in Serbian legislative procedures (as of April 13, 2023) either.
Though not formally binding, the draft law has been cited in recent years in the Serbian law journals, being an important point of reference for considerations on questions related to private international law in Serbia.
It must be admitted that the progressive Serbian academic community turned out to be an active inspirer, creator and is now also a tireless advocate of changes in the field of private international law in Serbia.
Serbia, which has been an EU candidate since 2013, has no particular obligation to introduce specific solutions in the field of private international law into its national law neither before nor after accession.
EU law in the field of private international law is contained in regulations that will be automatically and directly applicable in Serbia when it becomes a member of the European Union.
This is a dilemma whether to adopt the provisions which, in principle, will have to be repealed after the accession.
At the same time, there are several benefits of approximating the law before the accession, including accustoming legal practitioners in Serbia to apply solutions similar to those in the EU, and increasing legal certainty by applying similar solutions of private international law in transactions between entities from Serbia and the European Union (regardless of the accession prospects).
The author describes and summarizes the current state of regulations in Serbian private international law and analyses the main changes proposed in the draft law of 2014.
The article also presents agreements binding Serbia in the field of private international law, including the still binding 1960 Polish-Serbian agreement.
Related Results
Because Neglect Isn't Cute: Tuxedo Stan's Campaign for a Humane World
Because Neglect Isn't Cute: Tuxedo Stan's Campaign for a Humane World
On 10 September 2012, a cat named Tuxedo Stan launched his campaign for mayor of the Halifax Regional Municipality in Nova Scotia, Canada (“Tuxedo Stan for Mayor”). Backed by his h...
O nowym unormowaniu holenderskiego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego
O nowym unormowaniu holenderskiego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego
Kodyfikacja holenderskiego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego została przeprowadzona w sposób, który nie był powszechnie akceptowany. Proces legislacyjny trwał ponad trzy dekady wys...
Europeizacja prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego — cel, ograniczenia, wyzwania
Europeizacja prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego — cel, ograniczenia, wyzwania
Rozwój europejskiego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego — ponadnarodowego prawa kolizyjnego organizacji międzynarodowej o celach integracyjnych — jest wydarzeniem bez precedensu. Pr...
Pewność prawa
Pewność prawa
Niewątpliwie kluczowe znaczenie dla kształtowania się ładu publicznego w państwie ma pewność prawa. Problem pewności prawa może być ujmowany w różnych płaszczyznach odniesienia. Sz...
Incoterms 2020 — sukces czy zagrożenie dewaluacji?
Incoterms 2020 — sukces czy zagrożenie dewaluacji?
Proces ujednolicania prawa stanowi jedno z większych wyzwań międzynarodowego prawa prywatnego. Sam proces ma długą historię, która jednak nie zaowocowała konkretnymi wnioskami na t...
Aktualne problemy stosowania prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego i sądów apelacyjnych
Aktualne problemy stosowania prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego i sądów apelacyjnych
Artykuł analizuje orzecznictwo polskich sądów w sprawach z zakresu prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego, koncentrując się na problematyce statutu kontraktowego. Autor zwraca uwagę na ...
Budżet a normy prawa podatkowego
Budżet a normy prawa podatkowego
Przedmiot badań: Niniejszy artykuł poświęcony jest wybranym relacjom prawnym i faktycznym zachodzącym między budżetem a normami prawa podatkowego, dotyczącym gromadzenia dochodów ...
Luigi Garofalo, Studi sull’azione redibitoria, 2000
Luigi Garofalo, Studi sull’azione redibitoria, 2000
Recenzja: Luigi Garofalo, Studi sull’azione redibitoria, CEDAM, Padova 2000, ss. 201.
W dwudziestym stuleciu zasadniczymi kierunkami poszukiwań romanistyki byty badania nad histori...

