Javascript must be enabled to continue!
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
View through CrossRef
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies globally, with appendectomy remaining the definitive treatment. Advances in minimally invasive surgery have positioned laparoscopic appendectomy as an alternative to the conventional open procedure, offering the potential for reduced morbidity, faster recovery, and improved patient comfort. However, open appendectomy continues to be practiced extensively, particularly in resource-limited settings. Comparative evaluation of both techniques is necessary to guide evidence-based surgical decision-making.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute, non-perforated appendicitis.
Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at General Hospital Lahore over four months, from April to July 2024. A total of 200 patients were enrolled and divided equally into two groups: Group A underwent open appendectomy and Group B underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Intraoperative outcomes included operative time and blood loss, while postoperative outcomes included pain scores at the fourth hour and incidence of intra-abdominal abscess within three weeks of follow-up. Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), blood loss was recorded in milliliters, and suspected abscesses were confirmed via ultrasound. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, with a p-value of <0.05 considered significant.
Results: The mean operative time was shorter in the open appendectomy group, while laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in significantly lower intraoperative bleeding (25.6 ± 36.2 mL vs. 6.9 ± 6.5 mL). Postoperative pain scores were higher in the open group (mean VAS 6.5 ± 0.87) compared to the laparoscopic group (mean VAS 4.5 ± 0.87). Intra-abdominal abscess formation occurred in 3 patients (3%) in the open group and 5 patients (5%) in the laparoscopic group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrated superiority in terms of reduced bleeding and postoperative pain, whereas open appendectomy showed advantages of shorter operative time and fewer abscesses. Surgical decision-making should remain patient-centered, taking into account individual physiology, disease complexity, and institutional resources.
Title: OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Description:
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies globally, with appendectomy remaining the definitive treatment.
Advances in minimally invasive surgery have positioned laparoscopic appendectomy as an alternative to the conventional open procedure, offering the potential for reduced morbidity, faster recovery, and improved patient comfort.
However, open appendectomy continues to be practiced extensively, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Comparative evaluation of both techniques is necessary to guide evidence-based surgical decision-making.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute, non-perforated appendicitis.
Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at General Hospital Lahore over four months, from April to July 2024.
A total of 200 patients were enrolled and divided equally into two groups: Group A underwent open appendectomy and Group B underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.
Intraoperative outcomes included operative time and blood loss, while postoperative outcomes included pain scores at the fourth hour and incidence of intra-abdominal abscess within three weeks of follow-up.
Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), blood loss was recorded in milliliters, and suspected abscesses were confirmed via ultrasound.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, with a p-value of <0.
05 considered significant.
Results: The mean operative time was shorter in the open appendectomy group, while laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in significantly lower intraoperative bleeding (25.
6 ± 36.
2 mL vs.
6.
9 ± 6.
5 mL).
Postoperative pain scores were higher in the open group (mean VAS 6.
5 ± 0.
87) compared to the laparoscopic group (mean VAS 4.
5 ± 0.
87).
Intra-abdominal abscess formation occurred in 3 patients (3%) in the open group and 5 patients (5%) in the laparoscopic group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrated superiority in terms of reduced bleeding and postoperative pain, whereas open appendectomy showed advantages of shorter operative time and fewer abscesses.
Surgical decision-making should remain patient-centered, taking into account individual physiology, disease complexity, and institutional resources.
Related Results
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. ...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with ...
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objective: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.
Study Design: Randomized control trial.
Place and duratio...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Objectives: The objective of this study were to compare the effectiveness of lateral transverse cosmetic incision (LTCI) versus laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operative and ...
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Appendectomy is one of the most common surgical emergencies for appendicitis. Despite the improvemen...
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has rapidly evolved into the technique of choice compared with open splenectomy (OS) because of the advantages of the minimally invasive approach. Spl...
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as the gold standard treatment for cholecystolithiasis. The critical view of safety is a generally accepted ...

