Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Adolescents’ self-efficacy and digital health literacy: a cross-sectional mixed methods study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The internet and social media are increasingly popular sources of health information for adolescents. Using online health information requires digital health literacy, consisting of literacy, analytical skills and personal capabilities such as self-efficacy. Appraising trustworthiness and relevance of online health information requires critical health literacy to discriminate between sources, critically analyse meaning and relevance, and use information for personal health. Adolescents with poor digital health literacy risk using misinformation, with potential negative health outcomes. We aimed to understand adolescents’ contemporary digital health literacy and compared self-efficacy with capability.
Methods
Adolescents (12–17 years) completed an eHEALS self-report digital health literacy measure, a practical search task using a think-aloud protocol and an interview to capture perceived and actual digital health literacy. eHEALS scores were generated using descriptive statistics, search tasks were analysed using an observation checklist and interviews were thematically analysed based on Social Cognitive Theory, focussing on self-efficacy.
Results
Twenty-one participants generally had high self-efficacy using online health information but perceived their digital health literacy to be higher than demonstrated. They accessed online health information unintentionally on social media and intentionally via search engines. They appraised information medium, source and content using general internet searching heuristics taught at school. Information on social media was considered less trustworthy than websites, but participants used similar appraisal strategies for both; some search/appraisal heuristics were insufficiently nuanced for digital health information, sometimes resulting in misplaced trust or diminished self-efficacy. Participants felt anxious or relieved after finding online health information, depending on content, understanding and satisfaction. They did not act on information without parental and/or health professional advice. They rarely discussed findings with health professionals but would welcome discussions and learning how to find and appraise online health information.
Conclusions
Whilst adolescents possess many important digital health literacy skills and generally feel self-efficacious in using them, their critical health literacy needs improving. Adolescents desire increased digital health literacy so they can confidently appraise health information they find online and on social media. Co-designed educational interventions with adolescents and health providers are required.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Adolescents’ self-efficacy and digital health literacy: a cross-sectional mixed methods study
Description:
Abstract
Background
The internet and social media are increasingly popular sources of health information for adolescents.
Using online health information requires digital health literacy, consisting of literacy, analytical skills and personal capabilities such as self-efficacy.
Appraising trustworthiness and relevance of online health information requires critical health literacy to discriminate between sources, critically analyse meaning and relevance, and use information for personal health.
Adolescents with poor digital health literacy risk using misinformation, with potential negative health outcomes.
We aimed to understand adolescents’ contemporary digital health literacy and compared self-efficacy with capability.
Methods
Adolescents (12–17 years) completed an eHEALS self-report digital health literacy measure, a practical search task using a think-aloud protocol and an interview to capture perceived and actual digital health literacy.
eHEALS scores were generated using descriptive statistics, search tasks were analysed using an observation checklist and interviews were thematically analysed based on Social Cognitive Theory, focussing on self-efficacy.
Results
Twenty-one participants generally had high self-efficacy using online health information but perceived their digital health literacy to be higher than demonstrated.
They accessed online health information unintentionally on social media and intentionally via search engines.
They appraised information medium, source and content using general internet searching heuristics taught at school.
Information on social media was considered less trustworthy than websites, but participants used similar appraisal strategies for both; some search/appraisal heuristics were insufficiently nuanced for digital health information, sometimes resulting in misplaced trust or diminished self-efficacy.
Participants felt anxious or relieved after finding online health information, depending on content, understanding and satisfaction.
They did not act on information without parental and/or health professional advice.
They rarely discussed findings with health professionals but would welcome discussions and learning how to find and appraise online health information.
Conclusions
Whilst adolescents possess many important digital health literacy skills and generally feel self-efficacious in using them, their critical health literacy needs improving.
Adolescents desire increased digital health literacy so they can confidently appraise health information they find online and on social media.
Co-designed educational interventions with adolescents and health providers are required.
Related Results
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Adolescent Sexual Reproductive Health (ASRH) is crucial for the physical, emotional, and social well-being of adolescents. The paper aims to identify the barriers to ASRH in Ghana ...
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Data becomes something of a mirror in which people see themselves reflected. (Sorapure 270)In a 2014 essay for The New Yorker, the humourist David Sedaris recounts an obsession spu...
The Physical Literacy Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Han and Tibetan Children and Adolescents Aged 8-12 in China
The Physical Literacy Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Han and Tibetan Children and Adolescents Aged 8-12 in China
Abstract
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to explore the physical literacy characteristics and influencing factors of 8-12 year old children and adolescents from the H...
Decision-Making Ability: A Missing Link Between Health Literacy, Contextual Factors, and Health
Decision-Making Ability: A Missing Link Between Health Literacy, Contextual Factors, and Health
Background:
Health literacy has often been described as an important precondition for good health decisions, healthy behaviors, and health. However, reviews reveal low ...
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE READINESS AND TEACHING SELF-EFFICACY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF DIGITAL SELF-EFFICACY
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE READINESS AND TEACHING SELF-EFFICACY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF DIGITAL SELF-EFFICACY
This study examined the relationship between faculty readiness for artificial intelligence (AI) applications and teaching self-efficacy among higher education faculty members, and ...
Empirically Tested Health Literacy Frameworks
Empirically Tested Health Literacy Frameworks
Background:
Health literacy is a significant determinant of health behaviors, but the pathways through which health literacy influences health behaviors are not complet...
Health Literacy Research Funded by the NIH for Disease Prevention
Health Literacy Research Funded by the NIH for Disease Prevention
Background:
Advancing health literacy is a fundamental step toward achieving population health. To that end, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research to ...

