Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Health Literacy Research Funded by the NIH for Disease Prevention
View through CrossRef
Background:
Advancing health literacy is a fundamental step toward achieving population health. To that end, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research to increase scientific understanding of how health literacy can reduce disparities and enhance the health of the United States.
Objective:
This study identified and evaluated NIH-funded health literacy research focusing on disease prevention.
Methods:
New R01, R03, and R21 research project grants awarded from fiscal year (FY) 2004 to FY 2017 studying health literacy and disease prevention were identified. Study characteristics, including the role of health literacy, how health literacy was measured, populations studied, and study design, were coded for each grant. Administrative grant data were obtained from the NIH's internal database. Research impact was assessed using the relative citation ratio (RCR).
Key Results:
There were 192 grants studying health literacy and disease prevention awarded by 18 NIH institutes and centers from FY 2004 to FY 2017, covering a wide variety of health conditions including cancer (26.0%), infectious diseases (13.5%), nutrition (8.3%), drug/alcohol use (7.8%), and cardiovascular disease (6.3%). Most grants studied the health literacy skills of patients (88%), with a few studies assessing the health literacy practices of health care providers (2.1%) or systems (1%). There was good representation of populations with traditionally low levels of health literacy, including Black/African American participants (30.2%), Hispanic/Latinx participants (28.6%), older adults (37%), and people with low income (20.8%). The scientific articles generated by these grants were more than twice (RCR = 2.18) as influential on the field as similar articles.
Conclusions:
The NIH provided support for a wide array of prevention-focused health literacy research. The value of this research is highlighted by the number of funding institutes and centers, the diversity of populations and health conditions studied, and the effect these grants had on the field. Future research should move beyond patient-level health literacy to health literacy practices of health care systems and providers.
[
HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice
. 2020, 4(4):e212–e223.]
Plain Language Summary:
This study describes health literacy research funded by the National Institutes of Health that focused on disease prevention. These grants sought to prevent a variety of health conditions, but health literacy research over the past 14 years continued to concentrate on the capacity of patients despite increased attention on the health literacy practices of health care providers and systems.
Title: Health Literacy Research Funded by the NIH for Disease Prevention
Description:
Background:
Advancing health literacy is a fundamental step toward achieving population health.
To that end, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research to increase scientific understanding of how health literacy can reduce disparities and enhance the health of the United States.
Objective:
This study identified and evaluated NIH-funded health literacy research focusing on disease prevention.
Methods:
New R01, R03, and R21 research project grants awarded from fiscal year (FY) 2004 to FY 2017 studying health literacy and disease prevention were identified.
Study characteristics, including the role of health literacy, how health literacy was measured, populations studied, and study design, were coded for each grant.
Administrative grant data were obtained from the NIH's internal database.
Research impact was assessed using the relative citation ratio (RCR).
Key Results:
There were 192 grants studying health literacy and disease prevention awarded by 18 NIH institutes and centers from FY 2004 to FY 2017, covering a wide variety of health conditions including cancer (26.
0%), infectious diseases (13.
5%), nutrition (8.
3%), drug/alcohol use (7.
8%), and cardiovascular disease (6.
3%).
Most grants studied the health literacy skills of patients (88%), with a few studies assessing the health literacy practices of health care providers (2.
1%) or systems (1%).
There was good representation of populations with traditionally low levels of health literacy, including Black/African American participants (30.
2%), Hispanic/Latinx participants (28.
6%), older adults (37%), and people with low income (20.
8%).
The scientific articles generated by these grants were more than twice (RCR = 2.
18) as influential on the field as similar articles.
Conclusions:
The NIH provided support for a wide array of prevention-focused health literacy research.
The value of this research is highlighted by the number of funding institutes and centers, the diversity of populations and health conditions studied, and the effect these grants had on the field.
Future research should move beyond patient-level health literacy to health literacy practices of health care systems and providers.
[
HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice
.
2020, 4(4):e212–e223.
]
Plain Language Summary:
This study describes health literacy research funded by the National Institutes of Health that focused on disease prevention.
These grants sought to prevent a variety of health conditions, but health literacy research over the past 14 years continued to concentrate on the capacity of patients despite increased attention on the health literacy practices of health care providers and systems.
Related Results
UCAPAN UMA ABAH NIH, UMA MAMA NIH, UMA KAKAK NIH, DAN UMA SERTA PENYEBABNYA OLEH MUHAMMAD ZAINI PADA USIA 2 TAHUN 5 BULAN SAMPAI 2 TAHUN 8 BULAN (UMA ABAH NIH, UMA MAMA NIH, UMA KAKAK NIH, AND UMA UTTERANCE WITH CAUSE BY MUHAMMAD ZAINI IN THE PERIOD OF 2;
UCAPAN UMA ABAH NIH, UMA MAMA NIH, UMA KAKAK NIH, DAN UMA SERTA PENYEBABNYA OLEH MUHAMMAD ZAINI PADA USIA 2 TAHUN 5 BULAN SAMPAI 2 TAHUN 8 BULAN (UMA ABAH NIH, UMA MAMA NIH, UMA KAKAK NIH, AND UMA UTTERANCE WITH CAUSE BY MUHAMMAD ZAINI IN THE PERIOD OF 2;
Ucapan Uma Abah Nih, Uma Mama Nih, Uma Kakak Nih, Dan Uma Serta Penyebabnya OlehMuhammad Zaini Pada Usia 2 Tahun 5 Bulan Sampai 2 Tahun 8 Bulan. Penelitian ini bertujuanuntuk mende...
619. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Target Attainment Analyses to Support Epetraborole Dose Selection for the Treatment of Patients with Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease
619. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Target Attainment Analyses to Support Epetraborole Dose Selection for the Treatment of Patients with Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease
Abstract
Background
Epetraborole (EBO) is an orally available, bacterial leucyl transfer RNA synthetase inhibitor that concentra...
LB2306. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic attainment (PTA), and Clinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) to Support Dose Selection for the Treatment of Acinetobacter baum
LB2306. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic attainment (PTA), and Clinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) to Support Dose Selection for the Treatment of Acinetobacter baum
Abstract
Background
SUL-DUR is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination in development for the treatment of ABC infections, ...
593. Population Pharmacokinetic Model Development for Epetraborole and Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease Patients Using Data from Phase 1 and 2 Studies
593. Population Pharmacokinetic Model Development for Epetraborole and Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease Patients Using Data from Phase 1 and 2 Studies
Abstract
Background
Epetraborole (EBO), an orally available bacterial leucyl transfer RNA synthetase inhibitor with potent activ...
Decision-Making Ability: A Missing Link Between Health Literacy, Contextual Factors, and Health
Decision-Making Ability: A Missing Link Between Health Literacy, Contextual Factors, and Health
Background:
Health literacy has often been described as an important precondition for good health decisions, healthy behaviors, and health. However, reviews reveal low ...
Global Oncology Research and Training Collaborations Led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the 2018 NCI/ASCO Global Oncology Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers
Global Oncology Research and Training Collaborations Led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the 2018 NCI/ASCO Global Oncology Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers
PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers (NDCCs) are active in global oncology research and training, leading collaborations that contribute to the evi...
Empirically Tested Health Literacy Frameworks
Empirically Tested Health Literacy Frameworks
Background:
Health literacy is a significant determinant of health behaviors, but the pathways through which health literacy influences health behaviors are not complet...
8.H. Round table: Health Literacy in Action: Innovative and Inclusive Approaches from European Joint Initiatives
8.H. Round table: Health Literacy in Action: Innovative and Inclusive Approaches from European Joint Initiatives
Abstract
Effective health literacy is essential for individuals to navigate the complexities of health information, mak...

