Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

From lasik to smile: Time to change laser refractive surgery

View through CrossRef
Purpose: To illustrate the advantages and limitations of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) over Laser Assisted Intrastromal Keratomileusis (LASIK) in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Materials and methods: The two procedures are analysed and compared for the technical aspects. While LASIK directly depends on the laser efficacy to get the refractive change, SMILE only depends on the computer ability to design the refractive lenticule. The loss in precision taking place in the peripheral cornea with LASIK is not possible with SMILE. Tissue consumption and postoperative dry eye are also lower with SMILE. Procedure abortion has less consequences with SMILE. From a clinical point of view, refractive and visual results with SMILE are similar as those of Wavefront Optimized and Wavefront Guided LASIK, but re-operations are easier after LASIK than after SMILE. Conclusion: When indicated, SMILE is better than LASIK from a technical and procedural standpoint and is equal to Wavefront Lasik as for the obtained results. LASIK is still more versatile and it is better for re-operations.
Title: From lasik to smile: Time to change laser refractive surgery
Description:
Purpose: To illustrate the advantages and limitations of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) over Laser Assisted Intrastromal Keratomileusis (LASIK) in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Materials and methods: The two procedures are analysed and compared for the technical aspects.
While LASIK directly depends on the laser efficacy to get the refractive change, SMILE only depends on the computer ability to design the refractive lenticule.
The loss in precision taking place in the peripheral cornea with LASIK is not possible with SMILE.
Tissue consumption and postoperative dry eye are also lower with SMILE.
Procedure abortion has less consequences with SMILE.
From a clinical point of view, refractive and visual results with SMILE are similar as those of Wavefront Optimized and Wavefront Guided LASIK, but re-operations are easier after LASIK than after SMILE.
Conclusion: When indicated, SMILE is better than LASIK from a technical and procedural standpoint and is equal to Wavefront Lasik as for the obtained results.
LASIK is still more versatile and it is better for re-operations.

Related Results

Short term changes in corneal stress-strain index and other corneal biomechanical parameters post-laser in situ keratomileusis
Short term changes in corneal stress-strain index and other corneal biomechanical parameters post-laser in situ keratomileusis
Purpose: To report the short-term changes in a corneal stress-strain index (SSI) and other corneal biomechanical parameters post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) su...
Risk factors, incidence, and treatment options for post-LASIK regression: a systematic review
Risk factors, incidence, and treatment options for post-LASIK regression: a systematic review
Background: Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) describes the use of excimer laser ablation on the stromal bed to reshape the cornea and it is now one of the most commonly perform...
Comparison of Visual Outcomes of Extended Depth of Focus Lenses in Patients With and Without Previous Laser Refractive Surgery
Comparison of Visual Outcomes of Extended Depth of Focus Lenses in Patients With and Without Previous Laser Refractive Surgery
PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes of eyes with and without previous laser refractive surgery that received an extended depth of focus intraocular lens during cataract...
Wavefront Guided LASIK with a High-Resolution Aberrometer Induces Less Higher-Order Aberration than Early Custom LASIK
Wavefront Guided LASIK with a High-Resolution Aberrometer Induces Less Higher-Order Aberration than Early Custom LASIK
Abstract Background: The use of 'high-resolution' aberrometer wavefront-guided LASIK system offers the theretical advantages. To date there have been a few papers that prov...
ARE THE GINGIVAL DISPLAY AND THE SMILE ARC IN MALES AND FEMALES DIFFERENT?
ARE THE GINGIVAL DISPLAY AND THE SMILE ARC IN MALES AND FEMALES DIFFERENT?
Highlights Gingival display and smile arc enhance the aesthetic value of a person's smile and may be influenced through dental treatment. The individual profile photographs taken ...
Risk factors for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in an Egyptian population sample
Risk factors for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in an Egyptian population sample
Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (post-LASIK) ectasia in an Egyptian population sampl...

Back to Top