Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Renal calyx access does not affect intraoperative blood loss in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center retrospective study

View through CrossRef
Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the most effective ways of dealing with large renal calculi but also comes with a risk of intraoperative blood loss. Previous evidence is contradictory as regards the difference in blood loss between different renal calyx access. We conducted this study to compare intraoperative blood loss between different renal access calyx. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study analyzing 132 cases of single access PCNL, dividing them into an upper pole group (n = 93) and a non-upper pole group (n = 39). Intraoperative blood loss was calculated from pre-and post-operative hematocrit level, gender, body surface area, and amount of blood transfusion. Blood loss was compared between the two groups using univariable and multivariable analysis. Results: Overall blood loss was 500 ml (IQR 200-814 ml) with a median blood loss of 461 ml (IQR 158-738 ml) in the upper pole group and 650 ml (IQR 332-1233 ml) in non-upper pole group. Median hematocrit change was 2.9% and 3.9% in the upper and non-upper pole groups, respectively. The blood transfusion rate was 4.5% in the upper pole group and 8.3% in the non-upper pole group. The multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in average blood loss, hematocrit change or blood transfusion rate. Conclusions: Our study did not find any significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between different renal access routes in PCNL.
Title: Renal calyx access does not affect intraoperative blood loss in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center retrospective study
Description:
Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the most effective ways of dealing with large renal calculi but also comes with a risk of intraoperative blood loss.
Previous evidence is contradictory as regards the difference in blood loss between different renal calyx access.
We conducted this study to compare intraoperative blood loss between different renal access calyx.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study analyzing 132 cases of single access PCNL, dividing them into an upper pole group (n = 93) and a non-upper pole group (n = 39).
Intraoperative blood loss was calculated from pre-and post-operative hematocrit level, gender, body surface area, and amount of blood transfusion.
Blood loss was compared between the two groups using univariable and multivariable analysis.
Results: Overall blood loss was 500 ml (IQR 200-814 ml) with a median blood loss of 461 ml (IQR 158-738 ml) in the upper pole group and 650 ml (IQR 332-1233 ml) in non-upper pole group.
Median hematocrit change was 2.
9% and 3.
9% in the upper and non-upper pole groups, respectively.
The blood transfusion rate was 4.
5% in the upper pole group and 8.
3% in the non-upper pole group.
The multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in average blood loss, hematocrit change or blood transfusion rate.
Conclusions: Our study did not find any significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between different renal access routes in PCNL.

Related Results

Complications of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Complications of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Objective: To compare grade I complication as per Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing standard (with tube) verses tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Study desig...
[RETRACTED] Guardian Blood Balance –Feel the difference Guardian Blood Balance makes! v1
[RETRACTED] Guardian Blood Balance –Feel the difference Guardian Blood Balance makes! v1
[RETRACTED]Guardian Blood Balance Reviews (Works Or Hoax) Does Guardian Botanicals Blood Balance AU Really Works? Read Updated Report! Diabetes and Hypertension is such a health p...
Management of upper calyceal stone by percutaneous nephrolithotomy through lower calyx access: prone versus supine position
Management of upper calyceal stone by percutaneous nephrolithotomy through lower calyx access: prone versus supine position
Abstract Background The best way in the management of calyceal stone by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is to go directly into the desired calyx. However, in upper calyx, this ...
Radial nerve palsy following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Radial nerve palsy following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Injury to nerve is a well known complication of shoulder subluxation. Radial nerve injury is most commonly seen during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in lateral decubitus region. If ...
Upper, middle, and lower CALYX accesses for prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study
Upper, middle, and lower CALYX accesses for prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study
Objective: To compare upper, middle and lower calyceal accesses for prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy regarding stone-free rates, residual stones, haemoglobin drop and fluoroscopi...
COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL
COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL
Objective: To compare the stone free rates on patients with staghorn, renal pelvic, and inferior calyx stones with stone burden < 20 mm, 21-30 mm, and > 30 mm following percu...

Back to Top