Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

G.K. Chesterton’s Works in Literary-Critical Review by K.I. Chukovsky

View through CrossRef
The article is devoted to the perception of K.I. Chukovsky’s works by a famous English writer G.K. Chesterton. K.I. Chukovsky was one of the first to point out the ambiguity of the literary works by the English writer and called his journalistic activity more convincing. Describing G.K. Chesterton’s essays, K.I. Chukovsky believed that the writer is second to none in this genre. He praised G.K. Chesterton’s journalistic talent in responding to all the phenomena of contemporary social life. K.I. Chukovsky considered it obligatory for the Russian readers to familiarize themselves with the critical works of the English author. In the essay «Gilbert Chesterton. Manalive» (1924) K.I. Chukovsky substantiated why, for all the variety of genre forms that G.K. Chesterton used, Russian readers were familiar with only a few of his works. K.I. Chukovsky’s critical attitude to the novel «Manalive» is explained by his rejection of G.K. Chesterton’s utopian attitude to the social situation in England at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries. In G.K. Chesterton’s works K.I. Chukovsky saw a simulation of revolutionary pathos that did not solve pressing issues of social disorder.
Title: G.K. Chesterton’s Works in Literary-Critical Review by K.I. Chukovsky
Description:
The article is devoted to the perception of K.
I.
Chukovsky’s works by a famous English writer G.
K.
Chesterton.
K.
I.
Chukovsky was one of the first to point out the ambiguity of the literary works by the English writer and called his journalistic activity more convincing.
Describing G.
K.
Chesterton’s essays, K.
I.
Chukovsky believed that the writer is second to none in this genre.
He praised G.
K.
Chesterton’s journalistic talent in responding to all the phenomena of contemporary social life.
K.
I.
Chukovsky considered it obligatory for the Russian readers to familiarize themselves with the critical works of the English author.
In the essay «Gilbert Chesterton.
Manalive» (1924) K.
I.
Chukovsky substantiated why, for all the variety of genre forms that G.
K.
Chesterton used, Russian readers were familiar with only a few of his works.
K.
I.
Chukovsky’s critical attitude to the novel «Manalive» is explained by his rejection of G.
K.
Chesterton’s utopian attitude to the social situation in England at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries.
In G.
K.
Chesterton’s works K.
I.
Chukovsky saw a simulation of revolutionary pathos that did not solve pressing issues of social disorder.

Related Results

A crítica de Gilbert Keith Chesterton à filosofia moderna a partir da filosofia do senso comum
A crítica de Gilbert Keith Chesterton à filosofia moderna a partir da filosofia do senso comum
O presente artigo busca compreender a crítica de Gilbert Keith Chesterton à filosofia moderna a partir da filosofia do senso comum. Para tal intento, primeiramente é apresentado o ...
CREATIVE WORKS OF JOHN WILLIAM CHEEVER IN THE LITERARY-CRITICAL INTERPRETATION OF KORNEY CHUKOVSKY
CREATIVE WORKS OF JOHN WILLIAM CHEEVER IN THE LITERARY-CRITICAL INTERPRETATION OF KORNEY CHUKOVSKY
The article deals with the comprehension of the features of perception of works of American prose writer John William Cheever (1912-1982) by Korney Chukovsky. The appearance of the...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
“Zeus the Benefactor” and “the Born Gamin”: S.A. Vengerov’s Correspondence with K.I. Chukovsky (1907–1914)
“Zeus the Benefactor” and “the Born Gamin”: S.A. Vengerov’s Correspondence with K.I. Chukovsky (1907–1914)
For the first time, the article presents the correspondence between S.A. Vengerov and K.I. Chukovsky. It allows us to trace the literary relations between the famous bibliographer,...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Ivan Kashkin’s reception of the works by Gilbert Keith Chesterton
Ivan Kashkin’s reception of the works by Gilbert Keith Chesterton
The article deals with literary critical perception of art created by the English literature classic G.K. Chesterton reflected in the works of the outstanding Soviet literary schol...
Gender inversion in the ‘critique of a critic’. Zinaida Gippius on Korney Chukovsky
Gender inversion in the ‘critique of a critic’. Zinaida Gippius on Korney Chukovsky
Examined in the article is an obscure feuilleton called ‘An immature critic’ [‘Nevzrosliy kritik’] (1914), penned by Anton Krayniy (Z. Gippius) with Korney Chukovsky in mind. The a...
Representaciones de la felicidad en Borges y Chesterton
Representaciones de la felicidad en Borges y Chesterton
This article compares the different notions of "happiness" that Gilbert Keith Chesterton and Jorge Luis Borges handle in their respective works. Undoubtedly, Chesterton's notion of...

Back to Top