Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” in documents of international organizations
View through CrossRef
Over the past few decades a group of Crimean Tatar intellectuals have been imposing on public opinion the discussion that the self-name of the people “Crimean Tatars” allegedly does not reflect reality, it is “invented” and does not meet their cultural, public and national interests. From their point of view, there is a misunderstanding of the very word combination “Crimean Tatars” by the public, science and international organizations abroad, which creates confusion and “identifies” the indigenous people of Crimea with other peoples. From the point of view of the proponents of this concept, the adequate names are “Crimeans”, “Krymly”, “Crimeans”. At the same time, they claim that the word “Crimeans” synonymous with “Crimeans” is allegedly absolutely not close to it in meaning and cannot be mixed in any form of speech and in different languages. The author has analyzed the public documentation of the following international institutions: the United Nations (UN), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe (CoE), the European Union (EU), UNESCO for the presence in them of the mentioned words, both in the accepted translation into the languages of these organizations and in the Latin transcription of the words “Crimeans” and “Crimeans” in these languages (in order to avoid reproaches that the proposed words should be used not in their translation, but in their literal form).
Acquaintance with and recording of the number of uses of the centuries-old self-designation of the people, Crimean Tatars, in comparison with the proposed or assumed words “Krymtsy”, “Krym”, “Krymly” (including in the international Latin transcription Kyrymly) shows with full clarity that the self-designation “Crimean Tatars” in the official languages of the most important and influential organizations is widespread, understandable and accepted in official documents, while the expressions “Krymly” and “Krymly” are either absolutely absent or refer to completely different phenomena. The very attempt of renaming is an unfriendly action against the Crimean Tatar people.
Title: Ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” in documents of international organizations
Description:
Over the past few decades a group of Crimean Tatar intellectuals have been imposing on public opinion the discussion that the self-name of the people “Crimean Tatars” allegedly does not reflect reality, it is “invented” and does not meet their cultural, public and national interests.
From their point of view, there is a misunderstanding of the very word combination “Crimean Tatars” by the public, science and international organizations abroad, which creates confusion and “identifies” the indigenous people of Crimea with other peoples.
From the point of view of the proponents of this concept, the adequate names are “Crimeans”, “Krymly”, “Crimeans”.
At the same time, they claim that the word “Crimeans” synonymous with “Crimeans” is allegedly absolutely not close to it in meaning and cannot be mixed in any form of speech and in different languages.
The author has analyzed the public documentation of the following international institutions: the United Nations (UN), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe (CoE), the European Union (EU), UNESCO for the presence in them of the mentioned words, both in the accepted translation into the languages of these organizations and in the Latin transcription of the words “Crimeans” and “Crimeans” in these languages (in order to avoid reproaches that the proposed words should be used not in their translation, but in their literal form).
Acquaintance with and recording of the number of uses of the centuries-old self-designation of the people, Crimean Tatars, in comparison with the proposed or assumed words “Krymtsy”, “Krym”, “Krymly” (including in the international Latin transcription Kyrymly) shows with full clarity that the self-designation “Crimean Tatars” in the official languages of the most important and influential organizations is widespread, understandable and accepted in official documents, while the expressions “Krymly” and “Krymly” are either absolutely absent or refer to completely different phenomena.
The very attempt of renaming is an unfriendly action against the Crimean Tatar people.
Related Results
Information on ‘Tatars’ in Chinese Historical Chronicles: “Song Shi” and Works of Li Xinchuan
Information on ‘Tatars’ in Chinese Historical Chronicles: “Song Shi” and Works of Li Xinchuan
This article analyzes the ethnonym ‘Tatars’ within the context of Chinese historical sources from the Song dynasty, particularly focusing on the dynastic history “Song Shi” and the...
About the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars”: analysis of historical sources
About the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars”: analysis of historical sources
The article is devoted to the issue of self-designation of the Crimean Tatars. Among the Crimean Tatar people discussions have been going on for a long time on the topic of the tru...
Crimean Tatar-Danish diplomacy in the documents of the Crimean Khanate
Crimean Tatar-Danish diplomacy in the documents of the Crimean Khanate
The rubric presents original in language and style yarlyks and letters of the Crimean Khanate’s ruling elite, with the translation into Russian, reflecting the Crimean Tatar-Danish...
Formation of the system of orthology of the Crimean Tatar literary language
Formation of the system of orthology of the Crimean Tatar literary language
The modern Crimean Tatar literary language as a processed supra-dialectal version of the common language has a long history of formation and development. The foundation of the orth...
Ulus Juchi Tatars in light of historical sources
Ulus Juchi Tatars in light of historical sources
The relevance of this article is due to the fact that the principles of intercultural and interethnic interaction are increasingly being approved, the need for a scientific underst...
Alan Fisher. The Crimean Tatars
Alan Fisher. The Crimean Tatars
The given article is a translation from English of the well- known scholar, historian Alan Fisher`s work The Crimean Tatars. He was a professor of State University in Michigan, the...
The Heraldry of the Lithuanian Tatars from the 16th to the Mid-17th Century
The Heraldry of the Lithuanian Tatars from the 16th to the Mid-17th Century
The Hospodar Tatars in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania constituted a distinct ethno-social group descended from the Golden Horde, who, due to various circumstances, joined the grand d...
Crimean Khanate in Ottoman documents (3)
Crimean Khanate in Ottoman documents (3)
In 2013, in Istanbul (Turkey), with the assistance of the General Directorate of State Archives of the Republic of Turkey’s Prime Ministry, the book “Osmanlı belgelerinde Kırım han...

