Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparing vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol for labour induction in women with intra-uterine fetal death

View through CrossRef
The objective of this study was to compare complications and effectiveness of induction after vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol for labor induction in women with intra-uterine fetal death (IUFD). In a district hospital in Ghana, 23 women with IUFD who underwent labor induction with sublingual misoprostol were compared with a control group of 21 women who received vaginal misoprostol. In the vaginal group 28.6% had one or more complications compared to 21.7% in the sublingual group. In the sublingual group three inductions did not lead to delivery within 48 hours (13%), compared to four in the other group (19%). The mean induction-to-delivery time in the sublingual group was 13 hours and 17 hours in the vaginal group. In this study, both sublingual and vaginal misoprostol were safe and efficient for labor induction in women with IUFD. However, more research on larger numbers of patients is needed, in order to compare complications.
Title: Comparing vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol for labour induction in women with intra-uterine fetal death
Description:
The objective of this study was to compare complications and effectiveness of induction after vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol for labor induction in women with intra-uterine fetal death (IUFD).
In a district hospital in Ghana, 23 women with IUFD who underwent labor induction with sublingual misoprostol were compared with a control group of 21 women who received vaginal misoprostol.
In the vaginal group 28.
6% had one or more complications compared to 21.
7% in the sublingual group.
In the sublingual group three inductions did not lead to delivery within 48 hours (13%), compared to four in the other group (19%).
The mean induction-to-delivery time in the sublingual group was 13 hours and 17 hours in the vaginal group.
In this study, both sublingual and vaginal misoprostol were safe and efficient for labor induction in women with IUFD.
However, more research on larger numbers of patients is needed, in order to compare complications.

Related Results

Potentially acute misoprostol toxicity during third-trimester pregnancy: a case report
Potentially acute misoprostol toxicity during third-trimester pregnancy: a case report
Background: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommends the dosage of misoprostol for pregnancy termination in >28 weeks is 25 mcg to 100 mcg per...
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL IN REDUCING INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS DURING ABDOMINAL MYOMECTOMY
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL IN REDUCING INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS DURING ABDOMINAL MYOMECTOMY
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of 400 mg of sublingual and per rectal Misoprostol when given 1 hour prior to abdominal Myomectomy in reducing intraoperative blo...
Induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution 20 microgram versus vaginal misoprostol 25 microgram 6th hourly
Induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution 20 microgram versus vaginal misoprostol 25 microgram 6th hourly
Induction of labour is the artificial initiation of labour before the spontaneous onset, and it is the common obstetric intervention. To compare the potency of oral misoprostol sol...
Role of Misoprostol in Induction of Labor: Sublingual versus Vaginal in Tikrit City
Role of Misoprostol in Induction of Labor: Sublingual versus Vaginal in Tikrit City
A successful induction of labor leads to vaginal delivery of a healthy baby, in an acceptable time frame with minimum maternal discomfort or side effects. To compare the efficacy a...

Back to Top