Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution 20 microgram versus vaginal misoprostol 25 microgram 6th hourly

View through CrossRef
Induction of labour is the artificial initiation of labour before the spontaneous onset, and it is the common obstetric intervention. To compare the potency of oral misoprostol solution with vaginal misoprostol to induce labour at term. This randomized control study was carried out from July 2020 to September 2020 at Government General Hospital, Kakinada. : 80 women requiring induction were recruited in the study. The women were randomized to receive 20 micrograms of oral misoprostol solution every 2 hourly or vaginally 25 micrograms of misoprostol every 6 hourly until the labour sets in the active phase of labour. Delivery within 24 hours was the outcome in the study. Data were documented in Microsoft excel and analyzed using SPSS software. : 82.5% of women in the oral group delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery, whereas 75% in the vaginal group. In the oral group, 37.5% of delivery occurred within 6-12 hours, 40% delivered within 12-18hours duration, whereas in the vaginal group, 12.5% delivered within 6-12hours duration, 50% delivered within 12-18hours duration. Oxytocin augmentation was required in 25% of the oral group, whereas 42.5% in the vaginal group. Meconium stained liquor was 12.5% in the oral group, whereas 20% in the vaginal group.12.5% underwent cesarean section in the oral group, 10% in the vaginal group. Compared with vaginal misoprostol, oral misoprostol solution results in shorter induction delivery interval and less oxytocin augmentation required.
Title: Induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution 20 microgram versus vaginal misoprostol 25 microgram 6th hourly
Description:
Induction of labour is the artificial initiation of labour before the spontaneous onset, and it is the common obstetric intervention.
To compare the potency of oral misoprostol solution with vaginal misoprostol to induce labour at term.
This randomized control study was carried out from July 2020 to September 2020 at Government General Hospital, Kakinada.
: 80 women requiring induction were recruited in the study.
The women were randomized to receive 20 micrograms of oral misoprostol solution every 2 hourly or vaginally 25 micrograms of misoprostol every 6 hourly until the labour sets in the active phase of labour.
Delivery within 24 hours was the outcome in the study.
Data were documented in Microsoft excel and analyzed using SPSS software.
: 82.
5% of women in the oral group delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery, whereas 75% in the vaginal group.
In the oral group, 37.
5% of delivery occurred within 6-12 hours, 40% delivered within 12-18hours duration, whereas in the vaginal group, 12.
5% delivered within 6-12hours duration, 50% delivered within 12-18hours duration.
Oxytocin augmentation was required in 25% of the oral group, whereas 42.
5% in the vaginal group.
Meconium stained liquor was 12.
5% in the oral group, whereas 20% in the vaginal group.
12.
5% underwent cesarean section in the oral group, 10% in the vaginal group.
Compared with vaginal misoprostol, oral misoprostol solution results in shorter induction delivery interval and less oxytocin augmentation required.

Related Results

A comparative study of 25 mcg vs 50 mcg of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
A comparative study of 25 mcg vs 50 mcg of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
Background: The objectives of the current study were to compare the efficacy and safety of 25μg and 50μg of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term and to study the...
Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of early fetal demise at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore.
Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of early fetal demise at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore.
Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of first-trimester missed abortion at Akhtar Saeed Trust...
Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Catheterization in Labour Induction for Vaginal Delivery in Eclampsia Patients
Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Catheterization in Labour Induction for Vaginal Delivery in Eclampsia Patients
Background: Eclampsia, a severe complication of pregnancy characterized by seizures, remains a significant cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Effective and saf...
Role of misoprostol 4 hourly versus 6 hourly in medical termination of pregnancy in 2nd trimester.
Role of misoprostol 4 hourly versus 6 hourly in medical termination of pregnancy in 2nd trimester.
Objective: To determine efficacy of misoprostol given in 4 hourly versus 6 hourly intervals in second trimester for termination of pregnancy. Study Design: Cross sectional study. S...
Efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol in the management of first trimester incomplete miscarriage.
Efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol in the management of first trimester incomplete miscarriage.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol in first trimester incomplete miscarriage. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Gynae B Unit of Lady ...

Back to Top