Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluating N95 Respirator Designs: A Mixed-Methods Pilot and Feasibility Study

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had a global impact, underscoring the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE). The use of N95s reduces the risk of airborne infection; however, in the absence of equitable designs, health care workers (HCWs) who do not fit the average White male head and face are at an increased risk of airborne infectious diseases. Objectives Primary Feasibility of a mixed-method study, with a sample size of 100, 50% of participants self-identifying as non-White and having at least one characteristic of interest. Secondary: (1) Generate quantitative evidence on N95 fit using a PortaCount fit test, (2) describe participant-reported feelings on fit and breathability, and (3) evaluate the impacts of the pandemic on a HCW’s overall physical and mental well-being. Methods This was a mixed-method prospective pilot and feasibility study. Quantitative fit was assessed using a TSI PortaCount test and measurements of bizygomatic breadth and Menton-Sellion length. A survey was administered to collect sociodemographic information, HCWs’ assessment of N95 fit, comfort, and the impact of PPE-related challenges on well-being. Results This study did not meet feasibility criteria due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; however, we describe key findings that should inform ongoing analyses of the impact of gender and ethnicity on N95 respirator fit. Following a study amendment to increase eligible sites, 37 of the 41 (90.2%) approached HCWs consented to participate. Compared to other HCWs, non-White females had the lowest mean fit factor. Differences in Menton-Sellion length and bizygomatic breadth were observed between males, females, and White and non-White HCWs. Most HCWs reported physical discomfort and/or negative impacts on their psychological well-being due to fit. Conclusions We identified gender and ethnicity as key factors in the fit of N95s. Differences in gender, ethnicity, and anthropometric measures must be considered in future respirator designs.
Title: Evaluating N95 Respirator Designs: A Mixed-Methods Pilot and Feasibility Study
Description:
ABSTRACT Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had a global impact, underscoring the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE).
The use of N95s reduces the risk of airborne infection; however, in the absence of equitable designs, health care workers (HCWs) who do not fit the average White male head and face are at an increased risk of airborne infectious diseases.
Objectives Primary Feasibility of a mixed-method study, with a sample size of 100, 50% of participants self-identifying as non-White and having at least one characteristic of interest.
Secondary: (1) Generate quantitative evidence on N95 fit using a PortaCount fit test, (2) describe participant-reported feelings on fit and breathability, and (3) evaluate the impacts of the pandemic on a HCW’s overall physical and mental well-being.
Methods This was a mixed-method prospective pilot and feasibility study.
Quantitative fit was assessed using a TSI PortaCount test and measurements of bizygomatic breadth and Menton-Sellion length.
A survey was administered to collect sociodemographic information, HCWs’ assessment of N95 fit, comfort, and the impact of PPE-related challenges on well-being.
Results This study did not meet feasibility criteria due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; however, we describe key findings that should inform ongoing analyses of the impact of gender and ethnicity on N95 respirator fit.
Following a study amendment to increase eligible sites, 37 of the 41 (90.
2%) approached HCWs consented to participate.
Compared to other HCWs, non-White females had the lowest mean fit factor.
Differences in Menton-Sellion length and bizygomatic breadth were observed between males, females, and White and non-White HCWs.
Most HCWs reported physical discomfort and/or negative impacts on their psychological well-being due to fit.
Conclusions We identified gender and ethnicity as key factors in the fit of N95s.
Differences in gender, ethnicity, and anthropometric measures must be considered in future respirator designs.

Related Results

A Study of Strategies to Achieve Proper N95 Respirator Use by Regular N95 Respirator
A Study of Strategies to Achieve Proper N95 Respirator Use by Regular N95 Respirator
OBJECTIVE To explore different strategies for achieving proper use of N95 respirators by hospital staff, including viewing the donning process in a mirror, receiving assistance fr...
Adjusting a commonly used respirator pressure drop equation for use with modern respirators
Adjusting a commonly used respirator pressure drop equation for use with modern respirators
Millions of workers in the United States require the use of a respirator while at work. Occupational inhalation hazards have the potential to cause respiratory diseases. Wearing ...
Computer-Aided Customized Shape Design of an N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator
Computer-Aided Customized Shape Design of an N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator
A respirator protects its user by sealing the user’s face and filtering hazardous particles from environment. However, faceseal leakages of users-respirators always happen. First, ...
Laboratory Model Study of Single Five-Spot and Single Injection Well Pilot Waterflooding
Laboratory Model Study of Single Five-Spot and Single Injection Well Pilot Waterflooding
Abstract Many full-scale waterflooding operations are preceded by pilot floods, one purpose of which is to provide an estimate of recoverable oil. A laboratory mo...
Evaluating N95 respirator designs: A mixed-methods pilot and feasibility study
Evaluating N95 respirator designs: A mixed-methods pilot and feasibility study
Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had a global impact, underscoring the importance of personal protective equipment (P...

Back to Top