Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Participial Relative Clauses

View through CrossRef
Abstract Relative clauses of which the predicate contains a present, past, or passive participle can be used in a reduced form. Although it has been shown that participial relative clauses cannot always be considered to be non-complete variants of full relative clauses, they are generally called reduced relative clauses in the literature. Since they differ from full relative clauses in containing a non-finite predicate, they are also called non-finite relative clauses. Another type of non-finite relative clause is the infinitival relative clause. In English, in participial relative clauses, the antecedent noun is interpreted as the subject of the predicate of the relative clause. Because of this restriction, the status of relative clause has been put into doubt for participial adnominal modifiers, especially, because in a language such as English, they can occur in pre-nominal position, whereas a full relative clause cannot. While some linguists analyze both pre-nominal and post-nominal participles as verbal, others have argued that participles are essentially adjectival categories. In a third type of analysis, participles are divided into verbal and adjectival ones. This also holds for adnominal participles. Besides the relation to full relative clauses and the category of the participle, participial relative clauses raise a number of other interesting questions, which have been discussed in the literature. These questions concern the similarity or difference in interpretation of the pre-nominal and the post-nominal participial clause, restrictions on the type of verb used in past participial relative clauses, and similarities and differences between the syntax and semantics of participial clauses in English and other languages. Besides syntactic and semantic issues, participial relative clauses have raised other questions, such as their use in texts. Participial relative clauses have been studied from a diachronic and a stylistic point of view. It has been shown that the use of reduced forms such as participial relative clauses has increased over time and that, because of their condensed form, they are used more in academic styles than in colloquial speech. Nonetheless, they have proven to be used already by very young children, although in second language acquisition they are used late, because their condensed form is associated with an academic style of writing. Since passive or past participles often have the same form as the past tense, it has been shown that sentences containing a subject noun modified by a post-nominal past or passive participle are difficult to process, although certain factors may facilitate the processing of the sentence.
Title: Participial Relative Clauses
Description:
Abstract Relative clauses of which the predicate contains a present, past, or passive participle can be used in a reduced form.
Although it has been shown that participial relative clauses cannot always be considered to be non-complete variants of full relative clauses, they are generally called reduced relative clauses in the literature.
Since they differ from full relative clauses in containing a non-finite predicate, they are also called non-finite relative clauses.
Another type of non-finite relative clause is the infinitival relative clause.
In English, in participial relative clauses, the antecedent noun is interpreted as the subject of the predicate of the relative clause.
Because of this restriction, the status of relative clause has been put into doubt for participial adnominal modifiers, especially, because in a language such as English, they can occur in pre-nominal position, whereas a full relative clause cannot.
While some linguists analyze both pre-nominal and post-nominal participles as verbal, others have argued that participles are essentially adjectival categories.
In a third type of analysis, participles are divided into verbal and adjectival ones.
This also holds for adnominal participles.
Besides the relation to full relative clauses and the category of the participle, participial relative clauses raise a number of other interesting questions, which have been discussed in the literature.
These questions concern the similarity or difference in interpretation of the pre-nominal and the post-nominal participial clause, restrictions on the type of verb used in past participial relative clauses, and similarities and differences between the syntax and semantics of participial clauses in English and other languages.
Besides syntactic and semantic issues, participial relative clauses have raised other questions, such as their use in texts.
Participial relative clauses have been studied from a diachronic and a stylistic point of view.
It has been shown that the use of reduced forms such as participial relative clauses has increased over time and that, because of their condensed form, they are used more in academic styles than in colloquial speech.
Nonetheless, they have proven to be used already by very young children, although in second language acquisition they are used late, because their condensed form is associated with an academic style of writing.
Since passive or past participles often have the same form as the past tense, it has been shown that sentences containing a subject noun modified by a post-nominal past or passive participle are difficult to process, although certain factors may facilitate the processing of the sentence.

Related Results

Relatiivilauseet arkikeskustelussa
Relatiivilauseet arkikeskustelussa
Artikkeli tarkastelee laajaan keskustelukorpukseen pohjautuen sitä, millaisiin päälauseisiin relatiivilauseet liittyvät ja millaisia eri relatiivisanoilla alkavien relatiivilauseid...
Klausa yang Digunakan dalam Media Siber Infoindonesia.id
Klausa yang Digunakan dalam Media Siber Infoindonesia.id
This research aims to examine the types of clauses used in the cyber media Infoindonesia.id. There are three stages in this research; the data provision stage, the data analysis st...
Šalutiniai pažyminio sakiniai: kodėl vaikams sunku juos suprasti?
Šalutiniai pažyminio sakiniai: kodėl vaikams sunku juos suprasti?
The study aims to describe and interpret the results of testing the speech of Lithuanian children in order to find out whether language-specific features of Lithuanian as a highly ...
Headless Relative Clauses in Q'anjob'al
Headless Relative Clauses in Q'anjob'al
This chapter presents the first ever description and analysis of headless relative constructions in Q’anjob’al, a Mayan language spoken in Guatemala. It focuses on headless relativ...
Headless Relative Clauses in K'iche'
Headless Relative Clauses in K'iche'
This chapter offers a preliminary description of headless relative clauses in K’iche’. The language exhibits all three varieties of free relative clauses that are attested crosslin...
Headless Relative Clauses in Tlaxcala Náhuatl
Headless Relative Clauses in Tlaxcala Náhuatl
This chapter describes the basic structural, morpho-syntactic, and semantic characteristics of headless relative clauses in the variety of Náhuatl spoken in Tlaxcala. It shows that...
Headless Relative Clauses in Pesh
Headless Relative Clauses in Pesh
The aim of this study is to describe the two main kinds of headless relative clauses that are attested in Pesh, a Chibchan language spoken in Honduras: free relative clauses, which...
Headless Relative Clauses in Chuj
Headless Relative Clauses in Chuj
This chapter explores various types of headless relative clause constructions in Chuj, a Mayan language spoken in Huehuetenango, Guatemala, and Chiapas, Mexico by 45,000 to 70,000 ...

Back to Top