Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Heritage, Legacy, and the Life-Writing of Woolf and Rhys
View through CrossRef
My paper considers how Virginia Woolf and Jean Rhys conceived of their heritage in their memoirs along with the effect of their life-writing upon their literary legacies. Focusing on Woolf’s “A Sketch of the Past” and Rhys’s Smile Please: An Unfinished Autobiography, I consider the catalysts for their autobiographical impulses and how they shaped their lives on the page. What aspects of their heritage do Woolf and Rhys include, rework, veil, or perhaps suppress? Can their life-writing and concepts of heritage be classified in any particular way? Given the imbalance between the number of biographies and critical books and articles on Woolf as compared to Rhys, I then consider whether “Sketch” and Smile Please might be said to play a role in each woman’s legacy. To what degree does their life-writing determine their status within the academy? Does it influence the courses we teach and the articles we write—as well as those that get published? Does a certain kind of life-writing provide greater fodder than another for biography and literary criticism? In exploring such questions, I turn to autobiography theory: Smith, Watson, Benstock, Marcus, and Friedman, for example, along with work on Woolf, Rhys, and memoir by Dahl, Dalgarno, Johnson, Sellei, and Zwerdling. I also discuss David Plante’s most ungracious memoir of working with Rhys on her autobiography. In sum, I believe “A Sketch of the Past” and Smile Please can serve as fruitful gateways into both the heritage and legacy of Virginia Woolf and Jean Rhys.
Title: Heritage, Legacy, and the Life-Writing of Woolf and Rhys
Description:
My paper considers how Virginia Woolf and Jean Rhys conceived of their heritage in their memoirs along with the effect of their life-writing upon their literary legacies.
Focusing on Woolf’s “A Sketch of the Past” and Rhys’s Smile Please: An Unfinished Autobiography, I consider the catalysts for their autobiographical impulses and how they shaped their lives on the page.
What aspects of their heritage do Woolf and Rhys include, rework, veil, or perhaps suppress? Can their life-writing and concepts of heritage be classified in any particular way? Given the imbalance between the number of biographies and critical books and articles on Woolf as compared to Rhys, I then consider whether “Sketch” and Smile Please might be said to play a role in each woman’s legacy.
To what degree does their life-writing determine their status within the academy? Does it influence the courses we teach and the articles we write—as well as those that get published? Does a certain kind of life-writing provide greater fodder than another for biography and literary criticism? In exploring such questions, I turn to autobiography theory: Smith, Watson, Benstock, Marcus, and Friedman, for example, along with work on Woolf, Rhys, and memoir by Dahl, Dalgarno, Johnson, Sellei, and Zwerdling.
I also discuss David Plante’s most ungracious memoir of working with Rhys on her autobiography.
In sum, I believe “A Sketch of the Past” and Smile Please can serve as fruitful gateways into both the heritage and legacy of Virginia Woolf and Jean Rhys.
Related Results
Thinking Back through Virginia Woolf: Woolf as Portal in Lidia Yuknavitch’s The Small Backs of Children
Thinking Back through Virginia Woolf: Woolf as Portal in Lidia Yuknavitch’s The Small Backs of Children
“I am not Virginia Woolf,” a character exclaims in Lidia Yuknavitch’s award-winning novel The Small Backs of Children (2015). But who among us is? If we are women writers, particul...
The challenges and key issues in the promotion and conservation of cultural heritage
The challenges and key issues in the promotion and conservation of cultural heritage
Governmental policies and international agreements, such as the UNESCO World Heritage Convention, are evaluated to determine their impact on cultural heritage conservation. The stu...
A Critical Heritage: Virginia Woolf, Leslie Stephen, and Walter Scott
A Critical Heritage: Virginia Woolf, Leslie Stephen, and Walter Scott
“Questions of affection are, of course, always disputable. I can only reiterate that while I would cheerfully become Shakespeare’s cat, Scott’s pig, or Keats’s canary […] I would n...
Teaching Virginia Woolf in Sin City: Vegas Entertainers and a New Feminist Heritage
Teaching Virginia Woolf in Sin City: Vegas Entertainers and a New Feminist Heritage
Feminist discourse is evolving and a new wave of feminist consciousness is appearing in the media, in political debates, and in the classroom. I teach literature at a community col...
Identification, documentation and promotion of cultural heritage: problems and prospects in the Indian context
Identification, documentation and promotion of cultural heritage: problems and prospects in the Indian context
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to overview the current state of affairs of the Indian heritage treasures, which are being identified, restored, preserved and promoted by vario...
Introduction: Reading Virginia Woolf in the Anthropocene
Introduction: Reading Virginia Woolf in the Anthropocene
This introduction theorises what it means to read Virginia Woolf as a writer of the Anthropocene. It does so initially by situating Woolf within the early twentieth century’s growi...
Introduction: Virginia Woolf – Objects, Things, Matter
Introduction: Virginia Woolf – Objects, Things, Matter
The introduction opens with a brief interpretation of Virginia Woolf’s first short story, ‘The Mark on the Wall’ (1917), which positions Woolf’s investment in materiality as signif...

