Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Leibniz and Expression

View through CrossRef
This chapter looks at Leibniz’s central role in the concluding chapter of Deleuze’s Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. His elevated presence suggests a dramatic shift in Deleuze’s reading when compared with the rest of the text. It examines Deleuze’s lengthy discussion of Leibniz’s concept of expression and argues that within this discussion there is a shift from a ‘two-term’ concept of expression to a triadic concept which is closer to the one Deleuze finds in Spinoza. It then re-examines Deleuze’s central criticism of Leibniz, this time understood as a criticism of his ‘equivocal’ concept of expression compared to Spinoza’s ‘univocal’ concept. It shows that ultimately all of Deleuze’s criticisms of Leibniz can be reduced to an aversion to certain of Leibniz’s theological commitments and motivations. Finally, it looks in detail at the penultimate paragraph which, it argues, ends with a brief description of what will ultimately become Deleuze’s double process of actualisation and counter-actualisation. Crucially, Deleuze turns to Leibniz, rather than Spinoza, in order to explain these processes.
Edinburgh University Press
Title: Leibniz and Expression
Description:
This chapter looks at Leibniz’s central role in the concluding chapter of Deleuze’s Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza.
His elevated presence suggests a dramatic shift in Deleuze’s reading when compared with the rest of the text.
It examines Deleuze’s lengthy discussion of Leibniz’s concept of expression and argues that within this discussion there is a shift from a ‘two-term’ concept of expression to a triadic concept which is closer to the one Deleuze finds in Spinoza.
It then re-examines Deleuze’s central criticism of Leibniz, this time understood as a criticism of his ‘equivocal’ concept of expression compared to Spinoza’s ‘univocal’ concept.
It shows that ultimately all of Deleuze’s criticisms of Leibniz can be reduced to an aversion to certain of Leibniz’s theological commitments and motivations.
Finally, it looks in detail at the penultimate paragraph which, it argues, ends with a brief description of what will ultimately become Deleuze’s double process of actualisation and counter-actualisation.
Crucially, Deleuze turns to Leibniz, rather than Spinoza, in order to explain these processes.

Related Results

Tensor products of Leibniz bimodules and Grothendieck rings
Tensor products of Leibniz bimodules and Grothendieck rings
In this paper we define three different notions of tensor products for Leibniz bimodules. The ``natural" tensor product of Leibniz bimodules is not always a Leibniz bimodu...
Hubert Dreyfus ( 1929-2017), Raymond Smullyan (1919-2017) y el Sueño de Leibniz (1646-1716)
Hubert Dreyfus ( 1929-2017), Raymond Smullyan (1919-2017) y el Sueño de Leibniz (1646-1716)
Resumen. Dos filósofos recientemente fallecidos, Hubert L. Dreyfus yRaymond Smullyan, analizan las ideas de G.W. Leibniz sobre sistemasformales y máquinas lógicas. Dreyfus reconoce...
Symmetric Hom–Leibniz algebras
Symmetric Hom–Leibniz algebras
Abstract This paper focuses on quadratic Hom–Leibniz algebras, defined as (left or right) Hom–Leibniz algebras equipped with symmetric, non-degenerate, and invariant bilinear fo...
On Schur-type theorem for Leibniz 3-algebras
On Schur-type theorem for Leibniz 3-algebras
One of the classic results of group theory is the so-called Schur theorem. It states that if the central factor-group G/ζ(G) of a group G is finite, then its derived subgroup [G,G]...
EXAMINE THE INDEPENDENT DISCOVERIES OF CALCULUS AND THE SUBSEQUENT RIVALRY BETWEEN ISAAC NEWTON AND GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ
EXAMINE THE INDEPENDENT DISCOVERIES OF CALCULUS AND THE SUBSEQUENT RIVALRY BETWEEN ISAAC NEWTON AND GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ
The independent discovery of calculus by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz represents a defining milestone in the history of mathematics and science, highlighting the inte...
Perspectivisme. Leibniz, Nietzsche, Whitehead, Deleuze
Perspectivisme. Leibniz, Nietzsche, Whitehead, Deleuze
Le perspectivisme suscite aujourd'hui, en histoire de la philosophie comme dans la pensée contemporaine, un intérêt grandissant. C'est qu'il est une proposition à la fois épistémol...
Prognostic Implications Of PRAME Expression Levels In Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Prognostic Implications Of PRAME Expression Levels In Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Abstract The preferentially expressed antigen of the melanoma (PRAME) gene was first identified in melanoma tissue as a tumour-associated antigen recognized by autol...

Back to Top