Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Convex Mirror
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Schopenhauer is acknowledged as “the philosopher of pessimism” and author of a system that teaches how art and morality can help humans navigate life in “the worst of all possible worlds.” This dominant image has cut off an important branch of Schopenhauer’s tree of philosophy—metaphysics of nature and its constant dialogue with the sciences of the time. Beginning with a reappraisal of Schopenhauer’s system as a whole—which he defined as a “single thought”—this book interprets his metaphysics as a knowledge that brings value and meaning to our lives. More specifically, Schopenhauer’s writings show that he saw science as adding value to metaphysical knowledge. Understanding Schopenhauer’s metaphysics therefore requires both an understanding of the dialogue he maintained with the natural sciences and an appreciation of the role of the natural sciences in his philosophical project. And exploring the relationship between science and metaphysics provides a new perspective on his metaphysics and its development between the first edition of The World as Will and Representation (1819) and 1844, when Schopenhauer added a second volume of Supplements to his work. In 1819, he valued Schelling’s philosophy of nature as a model for establishing a link between metaphysical speculation and science. In the years that followed, he assessed the implications for metaphysics of the transformation of scientific research into a practice increasingly independent of philosophy. Such an assessment also affected his metaphysics, and even the will and Ideas underwent a process of revision.
Title: A Convex Mirror
Description:
Abstract
Schopenhauer is acknowledged as “the philosopher of pessimism” and author of a system that teaches how art and morality can help humans navigate life in “the worst of all possible worlds.
” This dominant image has cut off an important branch of Schopenhauer’s tree of philosophy—metaphysics of nature and its constant dialogue with the sciences of the time.
Beginning with a reappraisal of Schopenhauer’s system as a whole—which he defined as a “single thought”—this book interprets his metaphysics as a knowledge that brings value and meaning to our lives.
More specifically, Schopenhauer’s writings show that he saw science as adding value to metaphysical knowledge.
Understanding Schopenhauer’s metaphysics therefore requires both an understanding of the dialogue he maintained with the natural sciences and an appreciation of the role of the natural sciences in his philosophical project.
And exploring the relationship between science and metaphysics provides a new perspective on his metaphysics and its development between the first edition of The World as Will and Representation (1819) and 1844, when Schopenhauer added a second volume of Supplements to his work.
In 1819, he valued Schelling’s philosophy of nature as a model for establishing a link between metaphysical speculation and science.
In the years that followed, he assessed the implications for metaphysics of the transformation of scientific research into a practice increasingly independent of philosophy.
Such an assessment also affected his metaphysics, and even the will and Ideas underwent a process of revision.
Related Results
Ostrowski-Type Fractional Integral Inequalities: A Survey
Ostrowski-Type Fractional Integral Inequalities: A Survey
This paper presents an extensive review of some recent results on fractional Ostrowski-type inequalities associated with a variety of convexities and different kinds of fractional ...
Convex hull peeling
Convex hull peeling
Enveloppes convexes pelées
Cette thèse porte sur la construction du convex hull peeling (qu’on pourrait traduire littéralement par enveloppe convexe pelée). Le conv...
Decomposable Convexities in Graphs and Hypergraphs
Decomposable Convexities in Graphs and Hypergraphs
Given a connected hypergraph with vertex set V, a convexity space on is a subset
of the powerset of V that contains ∅, V, and the singletons; furthermore, is closed under inter...
Mirror Compensator for Testing Convex Secondary
Mirror Compensator for Testing Convex Secondary
The testing of convex secondary mirror of large telescope is known as a difficault thing, because it needs for a large mirror or lens. In USA, they used to use Hindle sphere for te...
Dual subaperture stitching for large flat mirror testing
Dual subaperture stitching for large flat mirror testing
The Ritchey–Common test is a widely used method for testing flat mirrors with a larger reference spherical mirror. However, with the increase in the size of the flat mirror, the fa...
Characterization of the Propagation Route of Light Passing Through Convex Lens
Characterization of the Propagation Route of Light Passing Through Convex Lens
Abstract
Existing optical theory states that the light directed to the optical center of the convex lens will travel in a straight line. Does the theory hold? If this is tr...
Asymptotic Farkas lemmas for convex systems
Asymptotic Farkas lemmas for convex systems
In this paper we establish characterizations of the containment of the set {xX: xC,g(x)K}{xX: f (x)0}, where C is a closed convex subset of a locally convex Hausdorff topolo...
Efficiently Constructing Convex Approximation Sets in Multiobjective Optimization Problems
Efficiently Constructing Convex Approximation Sets in Multiobjective Optimization Problems
Convex approximation sets for multiobjective optimization problems are a well-studied relaxation of the common notion of approximation sets. Instead of approximating each image of ...

