Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sanctifying evidentialism

View through CrossRef
Abstract In contemporary epistemology of religion, evidentialism has been included in a wider critique of traditional foundationalist theories of rational belief. To show the irrelevance of evidentialism, some critics have offered alternatives to the foundationalist approach, prominent among which is Alvin Plantinga's ‘warrant as proper function’. But the connection between evidentialism and foundationalism has been exaggerated, and criticisms of traditional foundationalism do not discredit evidentialism in principle. Furthermore, appeals to warranted belief imply that the heart of evidentialism – the proportioning of belief to rational grounds – has not been discredited but assimilated to the reliabilist view of knowledge by expanding the concept of evidence to include religious experience. In the end, the warrant concept extends the reach of evidentialism, thereby enhancing rather than diminishing its relevance for rational belief.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Sanctifying evidentialism
Description:
Abstract In contemporary epistemology of religion, evidentialism has been included in a wider critique of traditional foundationalist theories of rational belief.
To show the irrelevance of evidentialism, some critics have offered alternatives to the foundationalist approach, prominent among which is Alvin Plantinga's ‘warrant as proper function’.
But the connection between evidentialism and foundationalism has been exaggerated, and criticisms of traditional foundationalism do not discredit evidentialism in principle.
Furthermore, appeals to warranted belief imply that the heart of evidentialism – the proportioning of belief to rational grounds – has not been discredited but assimilated to the reliabilist view of knowledge by expanding the concept of evidence to include religious experience.
In the end, the warrant concept extends the reach of evidentialism, thereby enhancing rather than diminishing its relevance for rational belief.

Related Results

Evidentialism and Social Epistemology
Evidentialism and Social Epistemology
Abstract Traditionally, epistemology has been individualistic. Evidentialism fits squarely in this individualistic tradition. According to evidentialism, it is the m...
Reformed Evidentialism and Epistemic Responsibility
Reformed Evidentialism and Epistemic Responsibility
The Reformed Epistemology, developed by Alvin Plantinga, seeks to argue that belief in God can be considered properly basic in terms of justification and warrant. Plantinga claims ...
The Will to Realize
The Will to Realize
Abstract Chapter 8 reconstructs Vivekananda’s nuanced cosmopolitan account of the dynamics of religious faith. Vivekananda made a unique intervention in late ninetee...
Response to David Myers
Response to David Myers
David Myers's critique of my proposed Molinist solution to the so-called soteriological problem of evil miscontrues that solution in several key respects. Once those misinterpretat...
Conceptions of Faith
Conceptions of Faith
This entry focuses on the recent resurgence of discussion of faith in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion. One prominent position that perhaps runs contrary to the popular...
The God of the Self‐Movers
The God of the Self‐Movers
AbstractUnlike anti‐evidentialism, rational theism requires one to provide philosophically good evidence, on the basis of which one can rationally believe that God exists. Aquinas ...
Religion, history of philosophy of
Religion, history of philosophy of
The philosophy of religion comprises any philosophical discussion of questions arising from religion. This has primarily consisted in the clarification and critical evaluation of f...
Cambiando el enfoque: ética de las creencias e integridad intelectual
Cambiando el enfoque: ética de las creencias e integridad intelectual
This book challenges evidentialism, the dominant view in the ethics of belief. While following evidence is generally a sound practice, it does not exempt us from the reflective and...

Back to Top